Can we just go back to real papers,
real greenhouse concentrations and the papers that support the conclusions.
Not exact matches
There may be temporary imbalances, but they must average out over time.In an «equilibrium - response» experiment, scientists begin by setting up a climate model with
concentrations of
greenhouse gases (GHGs) at their present
real - world levels.
Hmmm... tick - tock, ocean heat content goes higher and higher,
greenhouse gas
concentrations go higher and higher, Arctic sea ice volume goes lower and lower, ocean PH goes lower and lower, Greenland and Antarctic glacial mass goes lower and lower... my, that all - powerful AMO better hurry back
real soon...
The
greenhouse effect is
real, as is the enhancement due to increasing carbon dioxide
concentration.
My level of knowledge is between 2 and 3 Votes are as follows 95.1
greenhouse is
real - > in a lab yes, in
real world 66 % 95.2 CO2 = ghg - > 66 % 95.3 CO2
concentration is rising - > 90 % 95.4 ant.
... The unprecedented increases in
greenhouse gas
concentrations, together with other human influences on climate over the past century and those anticipated for the future, constitute a
real basis for concern.»
... There is now general agreement among scientific experts that the recent warming trend is
real (and particularly strong within the past 20 years), that most of the observed warming is likely due to increased atmospheric
greenhouse gas
concentrations, and that climate change could have serious adverse effects by the end of this century.