Sentences with phrase «real harm to each other»

They have argued at least 20 times in the last few years and never done any real harm to each other.

But it would also be nice to see tourists taking greater responsibility for the problems they're causing and understanding that their industrial - style methods for seeing the world cause real harm to others.

Not exact matches

Displaying what Donald (now Dierdre) McCloskey once characterized as «the intellectual range from M to N,» there is no real comparison of the Fed's record with that of the system that preceded it; no mention of other monetary systems circa 1913 that had better records than the United States (most pertinently, that of Canada); not nearly enough acknowledgment of the great harm the Fed has caused more than once in its history; no discussion of why a few other central banks — though surprisingly, only a few — have performed better than the Fed; and no inkling that central banking may not be the best of all possible systems in the best of all possible worlds.

The real harm in Fifty Shades — and other «literature» like it — is that it dulls our conscience to the hideous crime that domestic violence really is.

Why should I encourage people to follow beliefs that are demonstrably false and lead to actions that cause real world harm to others?

But since in real life hospitals do everything possible to avoid harming babies we might have to accept that they have a motive other than profit.

We can not «spot reduce» fat - and I would caution you from taking any supplements that promise to do so, or use «cleanses» or other quick fixes like body wraps, as they are short - term strategies some of which can harm your hormones and will not give you real, long - lasting results.

No, the real harm that Amazon is doing to the publishing ecosystem is one I've mentioned numerous other places.

This announcement is one way the federal government hopes to help cool the hot real estate markets of Vancouver and Toronto without harming other regional markets.

If you feed your dog a diet that has human - grade, whole grains like those you would eat yourself (in an appropriate quantity, of course, combined with the real - meat protein, vegetables, fruits and other beneficial substances), then you will likely not be causing harm to your dog.

If people are used to harming each other without consequence in a virtual world, does this lead to more violence in the real one?

Although global warming strikes me as one of those issues where there is no real balance and it is wrong to create an artificial or false equivalence, there is no harm and some possibility of benefit in inviting skeptics about the human contribution and other factors to speak, but in a setting in which the context of the vast majority of scientific evidence and speakers is also made clear.

We shouldn't forget, these «Skeptics «are the exact same creatures who support whatever our President does, love to tell women they're not intelligent enough to know what's right for them... quibble over sick little details, like does cigarette smoke really harm infants and all the other «moral «things these great REAL Americans stand for.

The «protectionist instincts» that I and others have are (1) to protect the independence of the bar (sure to be lost eventually under nonlawyer ownership), (2) to protect the health of the legal marketplace (sure to be badly harmed by the cartelization of ABS (see the 5 % commissions charged by the cartel of real estate agencies who still control the vast majority of the realty market, and especially see the ridiculously high costs of dealing with the American title insurance industry where four companies have upwards of 87 % of the conveyancing and title insurance market after first decimating the real estate bar with predatory pricing and other unfair business practices)-RRB-, and (3) to protect the public from those ravages.

To further complicate matters, proposed sub-secti0n 10.2 (3) of Bill C - 12 defines «real risk of significant harm» as a product of two other factors: (a) the sensitivity of the information involved in the bread, and (b) the probability the information will be misused.

Sometimes our retroactive spousal support lawyers will argue there was a fear of harm by the needy spouse that caused them not to ask for support and sometimes it is for lack of resources to hire a lawyer and other times it is because the spouse who needed spousal support was mislead or not told about the real financial resources of the paying spouse.

See «-- Our User metrics and other estimates are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in those metrics may seriously harm and negatively affect our reputation and our business.»

The serendipitous approach to custody reflected in the District's presumption does not account for the real harm done to relationships when marriages or other familial unions dissolve, or when they never formed.

If you or a loved one has been harmed by a real estate agent or broker, by relying on their misguided advice, then you may have legal recourse against them as well as other parties to the sales transaction.