It was the unquestioned standing in L.A. and elsewhere of a critical and curatorial establishment that has come to condone and encourage a brand of reasonably literate mediocrity that plays well in press releases and short, inobservant reviews without saying anything of
real human consequence or posing a serious threat to anyone.
Not exact matches
This is because
human wickedness has
real consequences, and therefore our redemption (i.e. how God saves us from our sins) is not just about God «turning a blind eye» to our rejection of him.
This is because
human wickedness has
real consequences, and therefore our redemption (i.e. how God saves us from our sins) is not just about God «turning a blind...
If, as I think orthodox Christianity ultimately teaches, and as Solzhenitsyn's «Father Severyan» plainly teaches in November 1916 (excerpted here), that
humans are inherently prone to violence (and that the lesser evil of state - derived war is the price we pay for living not in anarchy but in «sword - bearing» states), then not only is 1) contrary to the New Testament's
real teaching, but 2) is impossible and 3) requires a coercion that will bring with it very deleterious
consequences.
If the notion of revelation is to be of any
real consequence to us, it must offer some response to our questions about the purpose of
human existence on this planet.
But I believe it was hinted at in the words of a young Cambridge undergraduate who told me that what he and most of his friends aimed at in their sexual behavior were three things: permissiveness, within the range of social decency and acceptance; affection, by which he meant genuine caring and the beginning of
real love; and responsibility, which he defined as readiness to stand up and take the
consequences for any and every sort of
human contact.
What
real human dilemmas did they address, how did they address them, and what were the
consequences?
The more Jamie puts
human faces on this health crisis, the better he drives home the terrible and
real consequences of how we live and eat as a society.
«In
real human terms, people are seeing the
consequences (of Republican policy),» Lavine said of the committee's support for the IDC resolution.
Apparently embarrassed by his vote, Kerry later explained that «the prospect of
human - induced global warming as an accepted thesis with adverse
consequences for all is here, and it is
real.»
«The big issue here is that
human beings clearly changed the environment, and that these changes had
real consequences for
human history,» Kidder said.
«Scientists... need to understand that they are responsible for
human lives, and their carelessness has
real consequences for people and their families,» says Naveen Sangji, Sheri Sangji's sister and a student at Harvard Medical School in Boston.
In it, virtual reality and artificially intelligent androids come together to create Westworld, a near - future amusement park styled after the wild American west where for the right price,
human men and women can live out their finest and darkest fantasies without
real - world
consequence.
The issue is
human trafficking, and as a way of apparently atoning for the movie's tendency to brush aside the
consequences of that
real - life horror, writer / director Deon Taylor provides us with some numbers just before the end credits roll.
A terrifying and affecting story of a sometimes sympathetic half - mad
human time bomb who explodes with highly ironic
consequences, its resonances with
real life are all too obvious.
Why are you afraid to admit the
real potential for serious economic
consequences from
human induced global warming?
This is a fun subject but has little to do with the
real consequences of
human - induced global warming and climate change.
Nature is kicking back on us because we're just slow learners about hurricane infrastructure preparations as well as not paying enough attention to the
real world
consequences of
human - induced global warming and climate change.
The Very Reverend Jebediah Hypotenuse August 22, 2013 at 12:36 pm The
real consensus police strictly enforce the «skeptic» «law» that
humans can dump gigatonnes of GHGs into the atmosphere with no significant negative
consequences.
To ignore these questions is to decide to expose
human health and the environment to
real risk before changing the risky behavior, that is, a decision to not act on a serious environmental threat has grave potential
consequences.
Because there is a
real difference between environmental concern — where
consequences matter — and environmentalism — where signalling adherence to the appropriate markers of concern (based on
human action being presumptively destructive) matter.
1) It is clear that the vast majority of people who truly are expert in the field believe that AGW is
real and that
consequences could be very damaging for
humans and other creatures.