Multivariate cointegration and causality between exports, electricity consumption and
real income per capita: Recent evidence from Japan.
Why not use
real income per capita?
As a result, there has been very little growth in
real income per capita since 2008.
Not exact matches
Real,
per capita income growth can only be sustained by increases in productivity.
«The departure of a franchise in any sports... has never significantly lowered
real per capita personal
income in a metropolitan area.»
And bear in mind, China's
real disposable
income per capita is growing at high single - digit rates.
In contrast, since 2011 there has been little net growth in
real per capita incomes.
The first is the recent slow growth in
real per capita income.
[181] Inflation - adjusted («
real»)
per capita disposable personal
income rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.
Yet what sort of «depression» is it which saw an extraordinarily large expansion of industry, of railroads, of physical output, of net national product, of
real per capita income?
The rate of growth in
real disposable household
income per capita is only 0.9 percent
per year.
As well, its five - year average growth rates for
real GDP
per capita and after - tax
income are fairly solid by North American standards.
The following chart shows that since February 2015, the growth rate of consumer revolving credit has nearly doubled from 3.4 % to 6.2 %, while the growth rate of
real -
per -
capita - disposable
income has been cut almost in half, from 3.2 % to 1.7 %.
From 1820 to 1994 the
real per capita income of the U.S. increased by...
Judged by the standard GNP statistics, the US
per capita income had increased in
real value by 25
per cent since 1976; but, using the ISEW, they found that over the same period the economic wellbeing of Americans had actually declined by 10
per cent.
- GDP
per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household
incomes are far lower in
real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade
Nations found in the good quadrant had lower
real per -
capita incomes in 1990 than did the United States in 1900 but a higher enrollment rate in 1990 than the United States had in 1900.
The lowest of the four points in the figure represents the
real per -
capita income and the high - school enrollment rate in the United States in 1900, just before the expansion of secondary - school education as a result of the U.S. «high - school movement.»
Consider Figure 1, on which the horizontal axis is
real per -
capita income in 1990 and the vertical axis is the rate of high - school enrollment in 1990.
A jump in daily essentials has a more profound negative impact on living standards in economies with lower levels of
real per capita income.
Investment
income is a small portion of national
income, and if
per capita real income could grow at a healthy rate alongside zero
real investment returns, social justice might well be advanced.
i think at 10,8 $
per share (which means they are trading around NAV) kwg is still cheap, especially because germany is the cheapest
real estate market world wide compaired to their
income per capita.
According to Amory Lovins, California's
per -
capita electricity use has remained flat over the last 30 years, yet
real income has increased by 79 %.
And California, he adds, «has held
per -
capita electricity use flat for 30 years — saving 65 peak GW and more than $ 100 billion of power - system investment — while
per -
capita real income rose 79 percent.»
Not necessarily because the
real GDP
per capita of Los Angeles is twice that of Berlin ($ US 21,432)- rather because the urbanization patterns in cities from high -
income nations as Stockholm, Tokyo, and Berlin (with lower levels of GHG emissions) suggest that there is not necessarily an inevitable relationship between rising
incomes, increasing use of private cars and increasing GHG emissions.
In this study, we analyzed the effects of financial development,
per capita real income, the square of
per capita real income,
per capita energy consumption and openness on
per capita CO2 emissions in the context of Pakistan during 1971 - 2011.
If their
real income (on a
per capita basis) is less than that of investment returns (which is likely), and we apply investment - based discount rates, we will make decisions that assume they will have more
real income in the future than they actually will have.
The attenuated commitment of middle
income earners to the civil justice system is reflected in
real per capita expenditures on health care and education in Ontario in recent years (both areas in which middle
income earners have a significant stake).
Real per -
capita income in metro Pittsburgh rose just 4.5 percent from 2009 through 2014, compared with 17.8 percent nationwide.
Real disposable personal
income per capita —
income after inflation and taxes on a
per - person basis — rose 1.9 percent, outpacing home prices over the entire period.