Sentences with phrase «real issue before the court»

«The real issue before the court is whether or not the plaintiff, had it closed, would have received what it bargained for...»

Not exact matches

The issue of permitting virtual office websites (VOWs) to publicly display sold data — a property's purchase history — is still before the courts, a years - long litigation between the Toronto Real Estate Board, CREA and the federal competition bureau.

• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and Federal Employment Law • School Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative Law & Appeals of State and Federal Agency Decisions and Actions • Special Investigations & Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School Board Training • Litigation in Federal and State Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals Before State and Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting • Construction Law, AIA Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special Education under IDEA and Section 504 • Student Rights & Discipline Issues and Hearings • State and Federal Claims of Discrimination • State and Federal Civil Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for Local Government Entities

I just bought some real estate with some of my emergency fund that needed several months before I could properly finance it due to some legal issues with the deed that needed to go through court because there was a deceased person on the title.

«This is another case where the English Courts have had to grapple with complex jurisdiction issues before getting to the real financial issues.

I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so on.

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

Mummery LJ points out that the real purpose of the discretion in s 2 (3) is to deal with «mixed claims» where equal pay is one of several issues before the court and splitting it off would be in the interests of judicial efficiency; it is not really addressed to issues such as those in these cases.

Only these six activities may be performed by qualified lawyers: the exercise of rights of audience (appearing as an advocate before a court); the conduct of litigation (issuing proceedings before a court and commencing, prosecuting, or defending those proceedings); reserved instrument activities (notably the conveyancing of real property); probate activities; notarial activities, and the administration of oaths.

There are of course arguments in favour of that kind of direct media engagement, but there are also real risks associated with it, particularly in cases where the engagement relates to the substantive issues that were before the court.

As I have argued before, «the real issue [with the hearing fees] is not that the courts are being interfered with, but that individual litigants are.»

Even though the Supreme Court ruled that Aereo can not sell a service that lets consumers reproduce TV signals in real time without a license, the court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New Court ruled that Aereo can not sell a service that lets consumers reproduce TV signals in real time without a license, the court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New court declined to rule on Aereo's DVR functions — that issue is currently before a federal judge in New York.

Regarding the plain language argument, the court found the issue before it was whether the making of a loan constituted the provision of a service «in connection with a real estate settlement.»

Prior to starting his own practice, Matt worked at a Boston firm where he addressed complicated and unique legal issues, argued motions before courts across the Commonwealth, and negotiated countless settlements, so, as a real estate broker, home buyers benefit from his negotiating experience.