Sentences with phrase «real life arguments»

I must admit, the fights between this married couples were some of the best moments of the movie as they really show the good performances from Paul Rudd and Leslie Mann while also showing some real life arguments that married couples have all the time.

Not exact matches

In real life, you'll hear variations on those objections, but the authors have created a good enough taxonomy to give readers the tools to address most unforeseen arguments on the fly.

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.

In terms of Newman's distinction between «real» and «notional» apprehensions and assents, Hartshorne's a priori arguments justify the notional assents which provide the intellectual and theoretical grounding for the experientially informed real assents of living faith.

Tell you what: If these ontological arguments are your «nails» in atheism's coffin, build a real - life house out of them and let's see how well it holds up.

Instead of big arguments and point - by - point apologetics, instead of reacting to slights, imagined or legitimate, political or religious or relational, I long to get on with my Father's business, to live into freedom in my real walking - around life, and I pray there's an invitation in there somewhere.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

I would have dismissed it immediately as one of those obscure and radical philosophical arguments of no real - life consequence.

If you are at all dubious about slippery slope arguments in this area, Smith's catalogue of real - life examples will cure your doubts once and for all.

This intellectual formation works against the metaphysical foundations of natural law reasoning, and therefore most people find the arguments remote and unconvincing — «academic» in the bad sense of being about something other than the real world we live in.

In order to have any hope of winning the debate, defenders of unborn life must understand how an argument that seems wholly reasonable to us can strike our opponents as a bizarre (therefore religious) doctrine wholly unconnected to the real world.

But on top of that its a great educational opportunity to take a real life issue that effects them and get the kids to research the two sides of the issue, present the opposing arguments and develop a recommendation.

The arguments that nut bans limit the food allergic children from learning to advocate for themselves or that they need to live in the real world which will not accommodate them are also very tired ones indeed.

We find the suggestion that this is the real reason for the MPA far more compelling than we do the argument that our return would be detrimental to the island, particularly when 1,500 servicemen and 2,000 civilian workers currently live there.

I understand the «correlation does not prove causality» argument but I have to take certain supplements or eat certain foods based on a number of observations or otherwise our life is too short to wait for real medical proof.

While it's true that, by all accounts, this behavior seems to extend directly from the ADD / overcompensation / showbiz - impresario persona he maintains in real life, that of a man who never outgrew directing Super Bowl commercials, it's hard to imagine an argument for a good movie to emerge unscathed from this crippling set of liabilities.

During the film's climax, which sees Wiley taking on the vaunted Harvard debate team (in real life, this never happened — they did battle wits with USC however), the content of the arguments, while discussing weighty issues, barely passes for interesting public discourse.

They read a novel about life in urban America, they write letters to city council members and state representatives, the compile statistics to support their arguments in their letters; in short, they use their discipline - based skills of scientific inquiry, math, literacy, social studies and health to do what people in the real world do — synthesize the skills and knowledge in a meaningful way.

This is especially true when it comes to dealing with tragic events that don't involve any political argument, but the lives of real men, women, and children, whose parents, siblings and kin have been brutally murdered.

You can make an argument that the live axle needs to be replaced with an independent rear suspension, but that's more of an academic discussion, because the suspension tuning is great in the real world.

A better argument would be for books not yet converted to digital or the real life issue of pdfs being exactly the size they were originally printed making the text absurdly small on a 6 or 7 inch e-reader.

Keep in mind that real life examples cement the argument.

For me, Deep Value was the perfect blend of real - life investing stories combined with the stats necessary to make for a convincing argument.

She goes further with an argument that such portrayals normalize such violence and thus hurt real - life women.

To counter this line of argument, I have found real life examples of the practical effects of climate change to be a more effective approach.

In effect, the «budget» arguments tend to reduce the observable reality into a quasi-spreadsheet of assumptions, negating the real costs already being experienced in lives and dollars.

So you have no argument with my maths or with the concept of relating the numbers to real life?

Unless any of the many, many people who have argued against the conclusion that Jelbring's work is completely wrong and should have never been accepted in the first place wish to keep arguing, perhaps the more polite ones can concede in one last post and we can wrap this up and move on to N&Z, the «existence» of a real, live GHE, and maybe, just maybe, get to where the skeptical arguments on the list are much better informed and less likely to play fast and loose with the laws of nature or thermodynamics.

Well, since I am not an academic, and live in the real world, the fact that the «whole policy issues» do exist, and are being implemented by deluded progressive governments as we speak based precisely on «science» like this, I find your argument irrelevant.

A few noted skepticism of climate science, saying carbon dioxide is «part of the cycle of life,» but for many opponents of the Clean Power Plan, the argument wasn't whether climate change was real but whether the plan's target on reducing emissions from coal power would effectively slow global warming.

You can argue and nit pick all you like about what heat is, but for those living in the real world feeling the real heat from the Sun and having been educated before AGWScience mangled everything or are in the real world science now using this real knowledge about Thermal IR, your arguments appear ridiculous.

Students found it more interesting to examine real life situations as they came before the courts, and were stimulated to learn the techniques of interpretation and argument by debating the merits of real cases.

Their arguments are heard by real - live judges who volunteer their time for mock trial.

According to the new website for Real Life, the magazine is going to «publish essays, arguments, and narratives about living with technology.»

In your letter, you need to convince the reader that you are the best candidate for event manager position by providing them with supporting arguments with real - life examples of your achievements.

This argument does not work in «real life».

These arguments aside, there is also empirical evidence that kids treat play as a tutorial for coping with real life challenges.

Your Economics 101 argument falls flat when it is compared to the real life facts of the real estate environment in Canada.