I pondered on
the real meaning of this question in my own life and I concluded that financial freedom would enable me to make decisions without having to think about the constraints of money.
Not exact matches
Humans have a history
of inventing supernatural answers when they have no
real means to answer a
question.
Indeed,
real questions remain: What does the sheer existence
of the modern state
of Israel
mean for theology» particularly for Christian theology?
The
real question is after several translations how much
of the original intended
meaning is actually there?
Nonetheless, he was justified in raising the
question of meaningfulness, and his
real contribution to the discussion lay in his probing the
question of meaning, particularly against the background
of religious experience and biblical presuppositions.
This is a travesty
of Christian theology, which is not simply an answer system but is, instead, a way
of connecting
real life
questions with fundamental and ultimate answers — which are by no
means achieved or given overnight.
This limitation is by no
means evident in terms
of the ontological principle as we know it from Process and Reality, but it was very
real in terms
of the ontological principle Whitehead was then working with: «That every condition to which the process
of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason in the character
of some actual entity whose objectification is one
of the components entering into the particular instance in
question» (EWM 323f).
The fundamental
question that Bonhoeffer poses before us is «If religion is no more than a «garment
of Christianity» which must now be cast aside because it has lost its
meaning in a «world come
of age», if the
real problem facing Christianity today is not so much that
of religionlessness, but precisely that
of religion, then what does all this
mean for the church?»
This aspect
of the new
meaning in the life
of faith helps us to see more deeply into the
question of whether faith can ever be lost once it has become
real in life.
The
question about the translation
of sursum corda draws our attention to the
real meaning of that phrase: literally sursum corda would be translated «hearts upward» or «up hearts.»
18:21 - 22) That
means, if forgiveness is to be
real, there is no
question of commensurable achievements upon which the petitioner depends and bases a claim; the petition for forgiveness must be made by men who wholly renounce all claim.
With the coming
of television, people were further encouraged to meet the needs
of capitalism: to consume without end, to use up, throw away and buy again; to repress individuality so as to not
question the process which provided an endless stream
of products; to seek the immediate and the sensational, changing the channel every few seconds if it did not provide immediate stimulation; and, above all, never to ask
questions about the
real meaning of the system itself.
This makes sense
of Hartshorne's contention in his chapter «Abstraction the
Question of Nominalism,» that the novel forms emergent in a creative event are not determinate before the event but become determinate by decision in the event; to deny this is to deny any
real meaning to creativity.
Questions such as whether the language of «faith» has any authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are free or determined, whether there is any «objective» truth to the symbols and myths of religion — all of these questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this
Questions such as whether the language
of «faith» has any authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is
real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are free or determined, whether there is any «objective» truth to the symbols and myths
of religion — all
of these
questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this
questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an ultimate context that gives
meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this process.
I agree with you wholeheartedly, but just for future reference, you might want to check out the
real meaning and usage
of «Begs the
Question» - dang it... the link won't post.
So the long and short
of your
question is: Yes, I know what the crucifixion
means to most Christians, however that has no bearing on the
real world for it's based on flawed logic and faulty creation myths.
Each describes a seemingly simple answer to the
question of the
meaning of life and then negates this answer with statements that typify confusion, mystery, openness, searching: «he does not know
real answers,» «you don't know where you're going,» «we find ourselves never getting anywhere,» «what are the
real answers,» «knowledge does not contain answers,» «there are no answers in power,» and so forth.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in
Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I
mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any
real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which
means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in
Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters,
means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it
means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this
means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future
of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful
of games I watched him play I still have some serious
questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics
of peripheral players and focus on the
real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which
means getting contracts signed, getting rid
of a lot
of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise
This
means not just hearing what your child says but getting involved in
real conversations with her: Ask
questions, make comments, keep the chat going, and give her plenty
of opportunities to speak her mind.
Find out about falling in love, what the
real meaning of love is - Christ's love and a host
of other do's and don'ts when it comes to making the right choice when choosing someone to marry and looks at the
question; are you compatible with someone - and how to know if you are!
And there lies one
of the many
questions director Spike Jonze explores, challenging us on our preconceived notions
of what makes a relationship
real and indeed, what it
means to be alive?
This is a film that
questions the true
meaning of love, that it does and does very efficiently, however we the audience become isolated from the characters, and only believe that Georges and Anne partnership is
real.
More to the point, what Spielberg probably doesn't trust is the viewer's intelligence and humanity,
meaning the
real question is whether he thinks the kind
of people who would go to a movie about Abraham Lincoln are morons.
well N64 games were on the Wii's eshop which
means they'll definitely return but the
real question is Gamecube games (and judging by the remake
of Wind Waker coming out GC games won't be coming anytime soon)
Moral
questions about whether the
means justify the ends are posed (still possibly the thorniest
real issue that the vigilantism
of the Batman character raises), and the political and social implications brought up in its grand finale are just stupendous.
Such narrative curlicuing is
meant to engender
questions of what is and isn't
real, but as Baby Doll plans her escape from this malevolent house
of burlesque and prostitution, Snyder's attempts at generating confusion flop miserably.
And even in self - publishing, you have the ominous
question of whether it's «vanity» or not (another moral judgment, but not one without
real consequential
meaning for those who are genuinely taken to the cleaners by bad actors).
As a former blogger, first
of a personal blog and then as a book reviewer on this blog, I related well to the
questions in Mitzi Bytes
of what it
means to be both a
real person and an online personality, whether secret or out in the open.
This can
mean year after year
of compound growth for your money.While a Roth IRA is a great way to save for retirement, the
real question is whether it's the best savings option for you.
Calum Petrie reviews Deus Ex Universe: Children's Crusade # 5... As TF29 heads into the Glasshutte for a final confrontation with the pro-aug forces, two
questions remain in Adam Jensen's mind: what will this
mean for the future
of augmentation and will the
real conspirators ever come to light?
He made a name for himself on the Turkish and international contemporary art scene by creating videos that raise fundamental
questions about the
meaning and significance
of human activity and labor as well as the authentic experiences
of people while they are working on the
real projects.
In an age where, because
of technological advance, the veracity
of the photographic image has long been cast into doubt and reality and history are easily manipulated to appear «
real», Douglas employs a large format and an almost hallucinatory sharpness, the result
of digital rendering, to
question authorship, reality and the truth and
meaning behind what we see — truth within the medium
of photography and within the political and sociological issues that underpin the scenes his photographs portray.
This is
meant as a response to the philosophical
questions raised by Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas on the nature
of being and the essence
of things, either
real or imagined.
However, the
real question of what does language
mean in terms
of behavior hasn't been scientifically studied.
The first part
of the hearing had some
real nasty actors, ably supported by the usual suspects, and Heidi Cullen, who is a young, pretty, nice woman, was out
of her depth answering pointed
questions meant to undermine science, though she has the knowledge to do so.
The
real question now is not trying to reduce atmospheric CO2 as a
means of stopping global warming, but rather
Still, the
question here is the thermal inertia related to CO2, and it seems correct to me to isolate such presumed inertia factors to determine the
real meaning of each.
One simple example
of this fact is that the Climate Scientists in
question have mislead anyone susceptible, as to the use and
meaning of peer review in
real science.
«It's going to be
real tricky to figure out what this
means, and there's no
question that people are going to take advantage
of this.»
The
real question for the court was whether the height rule was a proportionate and necessary
means of achieving that objective.
As it was, the Court
of Appeal ruled in favour
of Sloane Stanley, which has left many in the property industry
questioning «what does this
mean for
real estate?».
It is not clear to what extent this TPP obligation would apply in scenarios where there is a
real and substantial connection between the company in
question and Canada, or whether PIPEDA's current restrictions on outsourcing
of services (ensure, by contractual or other
means, that the outsourced company will provide a comparable level
of privacy protection, Principle 4.1.3) might run afoul
of this provision.
It's true the prevalence
of social networks
means more matters before the courts will turn on
questions such as whether what's reasonable or unreasonable in a «
real life» interaction should be looked at differently when the interaction takes place online.
The judgment
of Lord Justice Rimer in the instant case is a full one, tracing the twists and turns in the case law, from the fons et origo on one - man companies (Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961] AC 12, [1960] 3 All ER 420), through the policy - driven phase (that the secretary
of state's guarantee was, in effect,
meant only for «
real» employees) as exemplified in Buchan v SSE [1997] IRLR 80, and then to SSTI v Bottrill [2000] 1 All ER 915, [1999] IRLR 326, where the Court
of Appeal had not followed Buchan and had instead held that it was a
question of fact, but in such a way as (the Court
of Appeal now accepted) had led to uncertainty
of application.
This decision clarifies two
of the lingering
questions from Van Breda, namely whether enforcement proceedings were subject to the same
real and substantial connection test, and whether the traditional
means of establishing jurisdiction were replaced or limited by the
real and substantial connection requirement.
«There's no
question in my mind this is going to have to go through judicial review; there's going to have to be some court cases in which the court is able to look at it through the eyes
of a
real scenario, and determine what the «serious harm to fish prohibition» in the act actually
means.
The photography
of JK Rowling's son without his parents» consent raises a
real question as to the nature
of the expectation
of privacy, where the resulting photo showed nothing demeaning and was not obtained by
means of harassment.
The chip in
question — AL6100 — is actually the second iteration
of Altek's
real - time depth - sensing silicont
meant for AI applications.