You wrote, «The problem of «extra heat» in land temperatures (likely to be UHI and more) is escalated by GISS because they extrapolate the ground based land temperature measurements over the oceans in stead of using
real ocean data...»
But you wrote in this post about Figure 7, «The problem of «extra heat» in land temperatures (likely to be UHI and more) is escalated by GISS because they extrapolate the ground based land temperature measurements over the oceans in stead of using
real ocean data.»
But when you write in a post here at WUWT, «The problem of «extra heat» in land temperatures (likely to be UHI and more) is escalated by GISS because they extrapolate the ground based land temperature measurements over the oceans in stead of using
real ocean data,» I will remind you that GISS notes the errors in the dTs data on their webpage:
The problem of «extra heat» in land temperatures (likely to be UHI and more) is escalated by GISS because they extrapolate the ground based land temperature measurements over the oceans in stead of using
real ocean data:
In their LOTI product, GISS does use «
real ocean data» for the global oceans where there is no seasonal sea ice.
Not exact matches
When Saildrone can connect all of its
data points, it will be able to predict natural disasters, provide
real - time weather conditions on the
ocean, and manage fishing areas and shipping lanes.
Four days after its launch on 17 January, the Jason - 3 high - precision
ocean altimetry satellite is delivering its first sea surface height measurement data in near - real time for evaluation by engineers from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES), EUMETSAT, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and scientists from the international Ocean Surface Topography Science
ocean altimetry satellite is delivering its first sea surface height measurement
data in near -
real time for evaluation by engineers from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES), EUMETSAT, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and scientists from the international
Ocean Surface Topography Science
Ocean Surface Topography Science Team.
Based on simulations using
real weather
data in the Atlantic
Ocean, the work was focused specifically on the transport of water from the tropics of the Caribbean to the Iberian Peninsula in Spain, but it suggests a more general way to study the transport of tropical water vapor globally.
Real - world
data back the claim: Accumulations of calcium carbonate in deep - sea Pacific sediments show that the Pliocene
ocean experienced huge shifts at the time, with waters churning all the way from the surface down to about three kilometers deep, as would be expected from a conveyor belt — type circulation.
St. Laurent says the gliders will revolutionise hurricane science: «Suddenly you have the ability to lay a
data grid out under the
ocean and collect
real information before, during and after a storm event.»
NEPTUNE Canada is the leading effort to wire a wide region of
ocean floor with multiple sensors, making
real - time, interactive
data streams freely available to anyone online.
That was the bump that some of those climate scientists were trying to get rid of [in the temperature
data], but it was a
real bump, and I think it was associated with these
ocean oscillations.
Gill used
real elevation
data to plot out Mars»
oceans, mountains, valleys, and other geological features — but then he used his own judgment to paint in the deserts, forests, and so on, using textures from NASA's Blue Marble imagery.
1400 Laura Francis, Education Coordinator, NOAA Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Engaging teachers and students with
ocean acidification science using
real data on pH variability in marine ecosystems
The next big leap will take the form of
ocean observatories — suites of instruments and sensors with long - term power supplies and permanent communications links that can feed
data to scientific laboratories in
real - time.
Beyond monitoring
ocean conditions, JCG is publishing the environmental
data for free and in
real - time to Japan's commercial fisheries and tourism industries.
Even if ultimately there is
real confidence in
ocean heat content
data — i.e. the trends exceed the differences in
data handling — without understanding changes in reflected SW and emitted IR it remains impossible to understand the global energy dynamic.
Whereas PPM
Data is immediate and accurately measurable and comparable to the «
real world» be it back to human emissions, be it sources, be it sinks, be it
ocean acidity, be it climate forcing long term and more than anything the dynamics of PPM is easily explained and communicated as a Definitive Yardstick or success or failure in meeting Goals (imho).
The models serve merely to quantify these basic facts more accurately, calculate the regional climate response, and compute effects (such as the expected increase in
ocean heat content or sea level) which can be tested against observed
data from the
real world.
Applying the same logic, any of the 20th Century History runs which exhibited similar abrupt shifts (Southern
Ocean sea - ice, Tibetan plateau snow melt and N Atlantic convection) which were not observed in the
real - world, should have also been excluded from the ensemble mean for Marvel et al to have any hope of credibly extending inferences to
real - world observational
data — even if we suspend disbelief with respect to other problems associated with
data, methods and relevance.
There has «already» been a measured slowdown in the ability of
oceans to absorb CO2 since 2000, and this is obviously really important
real world
data.
``... this is a preliminary attempt to shift climate models toward becoming a forecasting tool, mainly by tweaking them with
real - world
data (in this case
ocean temperatures) as they churn through their simulations.»
The researchers, writing in the journal Nature, stress that this is a preliminary attempt to shift climate models toward becoming a forecasting tool, mainly by tweaking them with
real - world
data (in this case
ocean temperatures) as they churn through their simulations.
Thus if one plots all the minima of the different historical measurements, that gives a better impression of the
real «background» CO2 level than the averages: see The same for
ocean data and coastal
data: all are around the ice core level.
The Group for High Resolution SST (GHRSST) is a follow on activity form the Global
Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) high - resolution sea surface temperature pilot project (GHRSST - PP) provides a new generation of global high - resolution (< 10 km) SST data products to the operational oceanographic, meteorological, climate and general scientific community, in real time and delayed m
Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) high - resolution sea surface temperature pilot project (GHRSST - PP) provides a new generation of global high - resolution (< 10 km) SST
data products to the operational oceanographic, meteorological, climate and general scientific community, in real time and delayed m
data products to the operational oceanographic, meteorological, climate and general scientific community, in
real time and delayed mode.
But I agree that
ocean heat flux pre-1900 is extremely uncertain — there is no
real data.
Technological advances make it possible to deliver
ocean carbon
data real - time but questions about instrument reliability and
data quality limit this practice at this moment.
Because you are fitting to look for a trend * after * selecting the
data that looks flat, the
real 95 % confidence interval of the trend in temperature (or
ocean heat content) over any of these intervals is much larger than what you are presumably calculating.
And of course, there's nothing in the actual,
real - world
data suggesting that the
oceans had a say:
Data from an
ocean glider equipped with a host of scientific instrumentation and deployed ahead of the storm allowed researchers not only to see how sediment was being redistributed by the hurricane as the storm unfolded but also to compare their
real - life observations with forecasts from mathematical models.
Now you scurry on over to Obama and tell him to divert some of the billions being poured down the toilet of innumerable statistical revisions of the limited
data we actually have, and start getting
real data on that
ocean heat content about which we actually know very little.
Argo era or 21st century is used quite a bit because it is «cleaner» less volcanic super El Nino influence and it includes more of the state of the art satellite and
ocean data., you can pick any spot you like I guess for a pub conversation, but the comparison with projections is the
real tell of the tape.
All five lessons focus on
real - world issues, related to
ocean surface currents, which are investigated using satellite
data, most collected by satellites and models.
Or do you really think the unified congressional Republican front against admitting that climate change is
real and is happening, or that discussion of the
ocean is irrelevant and the subject must be changed to drive a stake into the heart of any
real data, is right?
This lapse of temperature
data of the
ocean's interior led to the scientific question over whether the world hit a «global warming pause» in the early 2000s, which fueled debates in congress over whether climate change is
real.
the
real accuracy of the historical
data, which may have been too variable because of place, time and method and too inaccurate to conclude anything about a (theoretical, but based on
ocean chemistry) trend of 0.1 pH unit over a century...
He doesn't need the complete
data to affirm his presupposed beliefs, just as he doesn't need experimental evidence or physical measurements or
real - world observations to affirm his belief that humans are heating up the
oceans with their CO2 emissions.
More likely the
oceans on our 70 % water covered world, which absorb heat energy from the sun (for which we have some
data), and geothermal energy (for which we have virtually no
data), and release it over long periods of time by poorly understood mechanisms that are possibly the
real driving force behind climate.
Since the areas to be measured every hour would be known in advance, we could then have ships on station to verify what the
real conditions are, against what the satellite
data reports over the
oceans.
But what is GISS's pretext for extrapolating the ground based land temperature measurements over the
oceans instead of using
real data?
Both studies use
real data and are very clear there is increased warming in the top layers of the southern
oceans.
The goal of OSCAR is to compile and analyze these
data then post
real - time information on
ocean currents on a web site.
Worldwide networks of buoys along with programs such as OSCAR (
Ocean Surface Currents Analysis
Real - time), which calculates surface currents based on satellite measurements, provide scientists with
data on which to build and test their models.