The attenuated commitment of middle income earners to the civil justice system is reflected in
real per capita expenditures on health care and education in Ontario in recent years (both areas in which middle income earners have a significant stake).
Then one of
real per capita GDP, suggests that Japan has not done much worse than the US, though demographics are a problem.
A jump in daily essentials has a more profound negative impact on living standards in economies with lower levels of
real per capita income.
In fact, the long - run expected increase in the real exchange rate between two countries can be approximated by the difference in productivity growth rates (estimated by
real per capita GDP growth rates).
From 1820 to 1994
the real per capita income of the U.S. increased by...
Had the Liberals, after 2000, held spending growth to a rate sufficient to cover increases in population and inflation — that is, had they held spending constant in
real per capita terms — they would have left the Tories with a budget of $ 148 billion in fiscal 2006, instead of the $ 175 billion it turned out to be.
Yet what sort of «depression» is it which saw an extraordinarily large expansion of industry, of railroads, of physical output, of net national product, of
real per capita income?
In 2014 dollars,
real per capita federal cash transfers rise from 21 dollars in 1870 to 138 dollars by 1945 and then reach 263 dollars by 1960.
Figure 3 also plots these federal cash transfers in
real per capita terms using a GDP deflator based on work by Mac Urquhart for the period 1870 to 1980 and then Statistics Canada (v62788999) for the period since.
(There is not universal agreement on this last point: Andrew Coyne, for one, prefers
real per capita spending.)
Our real per capita GDP growth is slipping in world rankings.
The first is the recent slow growth in
real per capita income.
In contrast, since 2011 there has been little net growth in
real per capita incomes.
«The departure of a franchise in any sports... has never significantly lowered
real per capita personal income in a metropolitan area.»
Not exact matches
Real,
per capita income growth can only be sustained by increases in productivity.
OKC is also tied for having the most
real - estate agents
per capita out of 150 cities, which contributes to its favorable market potential.
Laredo's house - flipping market potential — which factors in metrics such as the number of
real estate agents
per capita and the average gross return on investment — ranks 58th out of the 150 cities that WalletHub analyzed.
Without increasing the tax share of output, 1
per cent
real growth over the next 40 years will yield an inflation - adjusted increase in tax revenue
per capita of about 50
per cent.
And bear in mind, China's
real disposable income
per capita is growing at high single - digit rates.
Countries can force up economic growth rates (actual the growth rate of economic activity) simply by mobilizing savings and forcing up investment rates, but ultimately their inability to absorb continuously the higher levels of capital mean that they can not push
real wealth
per capita beyond some fairly hard constraint represented by their institutional inability to absorb investment.
The best way to compare gross domestic product by year and between countries is with
real GDP
per capita.
In 37 states, pension contributions plus state - funded Medicaid grew by more than state and local government tax revenue between 2007 and 2014, in
real per -
capita terms.
[181] Inflation - adjusted («
real»)
per capita disposable personal income rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.
This model generates the price of gold as a function of the global investment yield required to produce a constant
real after - tax return equal to long - term
real growth in global GDP
per capita.
Real net national product rose at the rate of 3.7 percent
per year from 1879 to 1897, while
per -
capita net national product increased by 1.5 percent
per year.
As Friedman and Schwartz admit, the decade from 1869 to 1879 saw a 3 - percent - perannum increase in money national product, an outstanding
real national product growth of 6.8 percent
per year in this period, and a phenomenal rise of 4.5 percent
per year in
real product
per capita.
Real reproducible, tangible wealth
per capita rose at the decadal peak in American history in the 1880s, at 3.8 percent
per annum.
As a result, there has been very little growth in
real income
per capita since 2008.
Measured in
real dollars
per capita — the more meaningful gauge — it will be 12
per cent higher.
The rate of growth in
real disposable household income
per capita is only 0.9 percent
per year.
I have looked at the relationship between
per capita changes in
real GDP and government debt
per capita and the relationship is negative, not positive.
The Winnipeg Industrial
Real Estate market is one of Canada's largest on a
per capita basis with over 80 million square feet of inventory.
As well, its five - year average growth rates for
real GDP
per capita and after - tax income are fairly solid by North American standards.
The following chart shows that since February 2015, the growth rate of consumer revolving credit has nearly doubled from 3.4 % to 6.2 %, while the growth rate of
real -
per -
capita - disposable income has been cut almost in half, from 3.2 % to 1.7 %.
China's
real GDP
per capita (person) is US$ 8,100, compared with US$ 56,000 in the U.S., $ 33,000 in Japan and an EM average of US$ 10,600.
Many Americans assume that because we are the richest country in the world, with
real G.D.P
per capita higher than that of other major advanced countries, Americans must be better off across the board - that it's not just our rich who are richer than their counterparts abroad, but that the typical American family is much better off than the typical family elsewhere, and that even our poor are well off by foreign standards.
After all, we really are the richest major nation, with
real G.D.P
per capita about 20 percent higher than Canada's.
Who gives a damn if the atheist rate is higher
per capita, the
REAL NUMBERS are 70 out of 100 babies are being killed by someone who is religious.
Judged by the standard GNP statistics, the US
per capita income had increased in
real value by 25
per cent since 1976; but, using the ISEW, they found that over the same period the economic wellbeing of Americans had actually declined by 10
per cent.
The results show that during the past twenty years economic growth as measured by current indicators, especially Gross Domestic Product
per capita, has been accompanied by decline in
real economic wellbeing.
- GDP
per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household incomes are far lower in
real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade
A worksheet (and extension task) for students to act as the ONS and calculate price indexes, convert nominal GDP to
real GDP, calculate GDP growth and GDP
per capita.
Real GDP
per capita is a measure that permits comparisons of material living standards over time and among different nations.
Nations found in the good quadrant had lower
real per -
capita incomes in 1990 than did the United States in 1900 but a higher enrollment rate in 1990 than the United States had in 1900.
The lowest of the four points in the figure represents the
real per -
capita income and the high - school enrollment rate in the United States in 1900, just before the expansion of secondary - school education as a result of the U.S. «high - school movement.»
Consider Figure 1, on which the horizontal axis is
real per -
capita income in 1990 and the vertical axis is the rate of high - school enrollment in 1990.
Why not use
real income
per capita?
Investment income is a small portion of national income, and if
per capita real income could grow at a healthy rate alongside zero
real investment returns, social justice might well be advanced.
i think at 10,8 $
per share (which means they are trading around NAV) kwg is still cheap, especially because germany is the cheapest
real estate market world wide compaired to their income
per capita.
(In other words, the
per -
capita real growth rate plus the population growth rate plus the inflation rate is close to 6 %.)