Sentences with phrase «real per pupil»

Over the past four decades, real per pupil spending in California has roughly doubled.

For the first time in decades, real per pupil spending will decline this year, forcing school districts to make painful budget choices — providing fewer services with their diminished resources.

A natural measure of the rise in costs is the rise in real per pupil expenditures for employer pension contributions.

Not exact matches

Cuomo said with New York's per - pupil spending already so high, gaining information about equity was «the real issue.»

In an article for the Guardian's Comment is Free site, the shadow education secretary Andy Burnham says the Treasury's green book shows the pupil premium will «sit within» a schools budget that will see per pupil funding falling in real terms.

The thinktank calculates that the reality of the government's small real terms increase in schools spending coupled with rising classroom numbers meant that spending per pupil would fall by 2.25 % over the next four years.

David Cameron ruled out a real - terms increase in school spending, but promised to protect per - pupil spending.

The Conservative party says it would protect school expenditure in cash terms per pupil, whereas Labour says it would protect school expenditure in real terms.

But when they were given the real numbers, only 42.9 percent of respondents supported raising per - pupil spending, and only 36.7 percent supported an increase in teacher salaries.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has counselled that spending per pupil in schools in England is likely to fall by eight per cent in real terms over the next five years.

However, this ignores the embarrassing reality that real per - pupil expenditures have more than tripled in the past four decades, without a corresponding rise in student achievement.

According to the report, schools are set to face real - term reduction in spending per pupil for the first time since the 1990s.

According to the unions, the average real terms loss would be # 96,481, or # 401 per pupil, for primary schools and # 290,228, or # 365 per pupil, for secondaries.

Changes in real state spending per pupil are uncorrelated with changes in 4th - grade student achievement in reading.

Real per - pupil spending increased from $ 1,380 in 1966 to $ 7,170 in 2002.

Hanushek and Rivkin have shown that real per - pupil spending began to grow in 1920 and that growth accelerated sharply in the 1960s, before unions had become entrenched.

However, Kevin Courtney, chair of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), said that all schools in England will have less money in real terms per pupil in 2020 than they do now.

The Education Policy Institute estimates that by 2019 - 2020 there are unlikely to be any schools in England which will avoid a real terms cut in per pupil funding, even in areas benefiting from the new formula.

Without the extra funds, the think - tank predicts that schools will face a real - terms per pupil reduction of three per cent by the end of the parliament.

By 2019 - 20, it is also believed that up to half of primary and secondary schools will be faced with significant real cuts in funding per pupil of between six and 11 per cent.

The Institute of Fiscal Studies estimates that schools in the UK will face up to 12 per cent real term cuts over the next Parliament while forecasts suggest pupil numbers will increase by seven per cent, a result of rising immigration and higher birth rates over the next five years.

Between 1970 and 1990, real expenditure per pupil increased not by 10 percent but by over 84 percent.

There have been 11 periods during which GDP declined but mean total real per - pupil revenues still increased.

Stating that allowing parents to use their 529 savings for K - 12 tuition «will erode the tax base that funds public schools» when it will benefit many middle class New Yorkers already taking a 2018 hit with lost state and local deduction opportunities; when the real world state budget impact is demonstrably negligible; and in a state that already spends more per public school pupil than any other — is simply poor public education.

The money ($ 1,000 - 2,000 per pupil) isn't enough to pay for actual private - school tuition, so that part isn't apt to get much real traction;

School spending per pupil across England is expected to fall by at least seven per cent in real - terms between 2015 - 16 and 2019 - 20, according to a new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: «Mainstream schools have to make # 3 billion in efficiency savings by 2019 - 20 against a background of growing pupil numbers and a real - terms reduction in funding per pupil.

The research by IFS associate director Luke Sibieta shows that an extra # 1 billion would result in a freeze to per - pupil spending in real terms in 2019 - 2020.

As for the latter, states must to find ways to get charter schools to a decent level of per - pupil funding, plus facilities funding, if not in comparison to traditional public schools then at least in terms of real dollars.

The National Benchmarking Overview Report 2016 - 17 which is compiled by local authorities shows that, since 2010 - 11, real - terms spending per primary and secondary pupil has fallen by 9.6 per cent and 2.9 per cent respectively, which translates as # 513 less per primary pupil and # 205 less per secondary pupil.

The situation is likely to get even worse, as it's predicted that 17,942 (nine out of ten) primary and secondary schools in England and Wales will be hit by a real - terms cut in funding per pupil between 2015 - 19.

He also added that per - pupil funding would fall in real terms to «lower than the system has been used to over many years».

The average amount of money spent per pupil by U.S. public schools has more than doubled in real terms since 1970, and the number of pupils per employed teacher has declined from 22 to 15.

«It doesn't mean real terms protection per pupil, and it doesn't mean protection for all elements of schools funding.»

To address this, I controlled for real per - pupil spending in the state when the survey respondents were 16 to 17 years old (in other words, respondents who were 18 years of age in 1980 were matched to their states» school spending during the 1978 — 79 school year).

The School Cuts website has updated its data, showing that 17,942 schools are facing real terms cuts in funding per pupil.

In 2003 the Boston school district spent $ 10,057 per pupil, similar to what Weston spent in 1999 in real dollars.

Know the risks We encourage school leaders and assessors to consider the real risks; is it appropriate for a school to close due to 75 mm of snow on the playground, when all teaching staff and parents know full well that 80 per cent of the pupils will take the day free to go sledging and snowballing while carers will have to take an enforced days leave of work, or other planned activities?

We encourage school leaders and assessors to consider the real risks, is it appropriate for a school to close due to 75 mm of snow on the playground, when all teaching staff and parents know full well that 80 per cent of the pupils will take the free day to go sledging and snowballing while carers will have to take an enforced days leave of work, or other planned activities (and hopefully go sledging and snowballing with the kids).

«It will mean that the total schools budget will increase by # 2.6 bn between this year and 2019/20, and per pupil funding will now be maintained in real terms for the remaining two years of the spending review period to 2019/20,» Ms Greening said.

Real per - pupil costs have quadrupled since collective bargaining began.

Thus, real spending per pupil in schools was 240 percent higher in 2000 than in 1960.

Per - pupil education spending more than doubled in real terms between 1970 and 2010.

State and local revenues per pupil fell in real terms in 39 states.

When federal stimulus dollars were added, overall real spending per pupil still declined in 23 states.

States must ensure that Title I schools receive comparable resources — including good teachers and real per - pupil dollars — as non-Title I schools.

Since 1960, the per - pupil cost of public schooling has risen by 3 1/2 times in real - dollar terms.

uk website has already shown that 99 % of schools in England will receive less money per pupil in real terms even after the implementation of the proposed NFF.

Since those words were written, real spending per pupil in U.S. public schools has risen by about 50 percent.

uk which uses the DfE's forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in cash terms following the implementation of the proposed new funding formula, and the National Audit Office's predictions for cost increases facing schools, in order to produce forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in real terms compared to now.