This is where the government's
real policy intentions will set out.
Not exact matches
But investment
intentions are helped by government
policies that recognize business bottom lines matter and thus can not have costs imposed on them absent
real - world conditions.
The questions «what were the stated aims», «what was the
real ideological
intention», and «why did the
policy not achieve the stated aims» give very different answers.
As with every anti-smoking
policy, the
real intention is not harm reduction, but denormalisation.
Although measuring outcomes rather than inputs has been the expressed
intention of standards - based reforms for at least two decades,
policy changes that make that shift
real have been slow to come to fruition.
As long as progressives don't succeed in gaining control over the internet and in stifling dissent on alternative media, exposing the
real costs of their
policies, and their true
intentions, will keep us from following them off the cliff.
That's the size of the gulf between the industry's stated
intentions and the industry's
real - world
policies, between what it says it intends to do and what it's doing.