Not exact matches
Thats great I'd rather see people with
real sobriety
standing up in
public, being identified, and trying to help others... I know thats crazy... Who in the media is a testament to AA's ability to help us?
Maybe this is his strategy — stay out of the last leadership race — it's likely to produce a dud, get the position of party chairman, make challenging powerful speeches and articles (he has identified the English democratic defecit, Toque, in his New Statesman article, which is about the best on the issue from any MP see: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2010/08/labour-party-english-england), make more of a
public name for himself, then
stand when the prospects of victory are
real.
The
real estate people
stand to make billions off killing or limiting rent control laws in NYC and the charter school charlatans are chomping at the bit at the prospect of putting an obscenely huge chunk of
public education money in their pockets.
«Scotland has used devolution to tackle long -
standing problems and there is
real pride, for example, in the way it has led Europe on smoking and
public health.
«Dirty Computer,» a celebratory ode to femininity and queer people, seems to signal a new era in her career: If in the past she seemed distant, using Mayweather to
stand in for the
real Monáe, she now seems ready to present herself to the
public.
· Tennessee PTA each year
stands against vouchers — Parents should be empowered with
real choices, if the integrity of
public schools remains intact.
Over the course of three hours, Coulson revisits the story of Jaime Escalante, the
real - life Los Angeles teacher whose success preparing low income
public school students for the AP Calculus exam was made famous in the 1988 film
Stand and Deliver.
Indeed, the establishment of a charter school in place of a
public institution has the
real practical effect of diminishing the rights of parents to be involved in their children's education; it curtails the parents»
standing as «citizens» and leaves them only as «consumers» or «stakeholders,» at best.
As I have stated before, it is time for all Indiana
public school systems to stand up and share with local taxpayers the real value of where their tax dollars should be going, and that is into INDIANA PUBLIC SC
public school systems to
stand up and share with local taxpayers the
real value of where their tax dollars should be going, and that is into INDIANA
PUBLIC SC
PUBLIC SCHOOLS!
Considering the reckless usage of deposits and other
public monies to build buildings just to claim that gdp is high (they count the cost of
real estate as investment not their final sales as the rest of the world does), all depositors in Chinese banks
stand to lose or at least have their funds frozen (since all credit funding the
real estate building comes from the banks and taxes & land seizures to a lesser degree).
As I've said over and over, I don't think that concerns over AGW
stands or falls on the Stick; as I've also said over and over (and as bender says above), I think that AGW advocates over-rely on the Stick and its cousins as a cheap promotional tool and that they should work much harder at proper
public expositions of their «
real» arguments.
They are trying to
stand their ground and repeat their cult mantras of «Climate Change is
Real» and «End the Denial» but the
public is starting to notice that the alarmist arguments are just a religious chant sounding like la la la la.
Picking up on Pete's point in # 123 that he is troubled by not knowing exactly what climate scientists are trying to tell us about where we currently
stand in regard to tipping points and todays ABC article on the acceleration of climate change which includes the comment: «But many experts confide privately what they aren't yet ready to announce publicly: Change is accelerating at a dramatic rate» (URL below) I would find it very helpful if someone from
Real Climate could tell us the summary message you want to get across to the
public regarding tipping points — is it the «alternative version» I set out in # 75 above or is it a modified version of this, if so it would be great if you could post the modified version up here — I would love to hear it.
Kerry Bretherton QC of Tanfield Chambers Has a long -
standing reputation for
public law and
real estate litigation, and regularly acts on behalf of social housing tenants and homeless applicants.
As noted by the Ontario Court of Appeal in M.E.H. v. Williams (2012 ONCA 35), purely personal interests can not justify non-publication or sealing orders: ``... the personal concerns of a litigant, including concerns about the very
real emotional distress and embarrassment that can be occasioned to litigants when justice is done in
public, will not,
standing alone, satisfy the necessity branch of the test».
Opening the MLS to the
public and adopting an appropriate, proven 21st - century business model would not only benefit the
public and Realtors directly, but also provide the financial means by which organized
real estate could develop the expanded infrastructure and services needed to provide world - class MLS data delivery services and give the Canadian
real estate industry the true professional
standing it has always strived to achieve.
Having said that, my view is that the revenues generated from advertising (to the
public viewers of the MLS) would be so substantial that Realtors in good
standing should only have to pay a token membership fee, rather than support the entire organized
real estate infrastructure.
However, the «general
public at large»
stands to benefit, first and foremost, as well as industry insiders, from a volcanic upheaval from within the organized
real estate industry via its grass roots practitioners.
Ergo, the low
standing that the
public pegs the
real estate sales industry at, down there with used car salesmen (they are mostly men), politicians (they will tell their selected constituencies whatever they want to hear in trade for votes) and others of a nefarious nature who end up behind bars.
We each have it, and that space, in the
real world terms is if you put out your arms, and rotate in a circle, that space allotment is «ones own personal space,» not to be invaded by others except by invitation, whether
standing in a supermarket line, or at a bank teller line, or in any
public space, should never be entered without a direct invitation, one to the other, as to be interpreted: I invite you into my space; come closer; I'm «inviting you into «my space.»
Who out there will be seconded, if ever, to step up to the plate to
stand up to the aided - and - abetted by government «agency» attacks of the Realtysellers et al of the
real estate world (the opportunists, as I see them) who wish to highjack a privately created and paid - for MLS, to tear down a functioning, albeit imperfect, system of providing
real estate services / products etc. (at the
public's pleasure, no less) for free, with negotiated payment for services / products only being forthcoming upon «successful completion» of contractual obligations.
Jack Lane, president of the London and St. Thomas Association of Realtors (LSTAR), recently appeared before the province's
Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs during
public hearings in London to make the case for two recommendations outlined in the Ontario
Real Estate Association's Pre-Budget Submission regarding personal real estate corporations and brownfields remediat
Real Estate Association's Pre-Budget Submission regarding personal
real estate corporations and brownfields remediat
real estate corporations and brownfields remediation.
«In our estimation, Doug's ongoing efforts over the past year to educate organized
real estate,
real estate associations and the
public on the potential negative impacts of wind turbines on human and animal health and on property values made him an absolute
stand - out for the OREA Volunteer of the Year Award,» says Barb Whitney, 2012 LSTAR president.
CREA has proven itself inadequate to the needs and expectations of the professional
real estate industry and the
public at large in recent dealings with the Competition Bureau, this sentiment is only amplified by contrast now in how TREB did in fact take the appropriate
stand against the legacy building actions of Melany Aitkens and the Competition Bureau she fronts.
Harrington added, «Not only is the value of the trademark diminished by this type of broadcast, it harms the reputation and
public standing, if not the livelihood, of hard - working Realtors, who pride themselves in offering professional
real estate services that comply with the highest ethical and professional standards.»
But the industry as a whole MUST
STAND TOGETHER or we are going to be eaten alive by rules and regulations that are in permanent motion but with no
real goal in mind to SERVE AND PROTECT... (the
public) we are a «self - policing» industry that sometimes is more than a joke, as seen by the
public, sadly.