Not exact matches
My experience with the Newcastle football team in Oklahoma leads me to believe that, as long as impact sensors are strictly used for the limited
purpose of providing
real - time impact data to qualified sideline personnel, not to diagnose concussions, not as the sole determining factor in making remove - from - play decisions, and not to replace the necessity for observers on the sports sideline trained in recognizing the signs
of concussion and in conducting a sideline screening for concussion using one or more sideline
assessment tests for concussion (e.g. SCAT3, balance, King - Devick, Maddocks questions, SAC)(preferably by a certified athletic trainer and / or team physician), and long as data on the number, force, and direction
of impacts is only made available for use by coaches and athletic trainers in a position to use such information to adjust an athlete's blocking or tackling tec hnique (and not for indiscriminate use by those, such as parents, who are not in a position to make intelligent use
of the data), they represent a valuable addition to a program's concussion toolbox and as a tool to minimize repetitive head impacts.
As this trail covers multiple areas
of mathematics it gives the teacher an opportunity to make
real assessment of learning in mathematics for both summative and formative
purposes.
Changing the type
of pedagogy used in the classroom and getting performance
assessments instead
of tests
of knowledge are the
real purpose of the Common Core campaign.
Over-testing students is a
real thing across the U.S., according to Scott Norton, strategic initiative director for Standards,
Assessment and Accountability at the Council
of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), who discussed the
purpose of state and local
assessment programs at Tuesday's meeting
of the new state Mastery Examination Committee.
The Missouri Department
of Elementary & Secondary Education says that to make portfolios really useful, remember that their
purpose is to serve as authentic
assessments — evaluations
of real student work over a given time period.
«Permitted Use»: (1) Installing, operating, maintaining, removing, replacing and collecting data from meteorological towers, stations and anemometers, conducting avian, archeological and biological
assessments, environmental
assessments, soil and preconstruction analysis, and other studies and evaluations deemed necessary by Grantee for
purposes of evaluating the Wind Resources
of the Premises, exercising the rights granted to Grantee hereunder, and developing the Wind Energy Project; (2) Constructing, installing, operating, accessing, maintaining and removing (including, when necessary, replacing)(a) WTGs on WTG Pads on the Premises for the conversion
of Wind Resources to electricity, and including replacing WTGs for
purposes of repowering for conversion
of Wind Resources to electricity on WTG Pads located on the Premises and / or in connection or conjunction with other
real property on which the Wind Energy Project is located; and (b) all related Improvements (i) necessary or convenient to Grantee in conjunction with WTGs for the Wind Energy Project (ii) for the use by Grantee in collecting, transmitting or otherwise making electricity from the WTGs on the Wind Energy Project marketable and available for sale; or (iii) for the use by Grantee for access to and from the Improvements or a public right
of way to the WTGs for the Wind Energy Project (in each case, whether or not such WTGs are on the Premises), or (3) uses otherwise permitted herein.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Municipal law — Taxation —
Real property tax — Payments made by Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M -
Real property tax — Payments made by Federal Crown in lieu
of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M -
real property tax — Assessed value
of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court
of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value
of the property determined by the
assessment authority in determining the property value
of a federal property for
purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court
of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value
of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination
of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion
of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu
of taxes, representing 47
of 49 acres
of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective
of assessed value — Payments in Lieu
of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M - 13.
Searched public and private records and indices and compiled a list
of legal instruments pertaining to property titles such as mortgages, deeds, and
assessments for insurance,
real estate, or tax
purposes.
At one recent meeting, there was extensive discussion about a court case in which an industry professional, selling her own condo privately, was found to have misrepresented a special
assessment while acting in her professional capacity; property defects or stigmatization; electronic agreements and the
purpose of «last to sign» in a
real estate offer to purchase.
«A variety
of indices are published regularly and may be appropriate for benchmarking, risk
assessment, and other
real estate investment
purposes.