Often deniers portray themselves as reasoned, cautious, and conservative scientists, while
the real scientists working in the field are described with emotionally charged adjectives like «alarmists,» «warmists,» and the like to weaken the public's respect for their work and to fool journalists about who's who.
Not exact matches
Real scientists who
work in the
field of immunology accept evolution as a fact.
There is a
real risk that necessary research is being held back as
scientists fear
working in such a contested
field.
The Danish scientific committe that looked at his publications seem to mean that, though his writings could be defined as «scientifically dishonest»
in a strict and narrow sense; Lomborg himself isn't really «guilty» of this «crime» because his articles, books, aren't really science at all, and he isn't a
real scientist qualified to
work in this
field.