Sentences with phrase «real spending per pupil»

Since those words were written, real spending per pupil in U.S. public schools has risen by about 50 percent.

When federal stimulus dollars were added, overall real spending per pupil still declined in 23 states.

Thus, real spending per pupil in schools was 240 percent higher in 2000 than in 1960.

Not exact matches

Cuomo said with New York's per - pupil spending already so high, gaining information about equity was «the real issue.»

The thinktank calculates that the reality of the government's small real terms increase in schools spending coupled with rising classroom numbers meant that spending per pupil would fall by 2.25 % over the next four years.

David Cameron ruled out a real - terms increase in school spending, but promised to protect per - pupil spending.

But when they were given the real numbers, only 42.9 percent of respondents supported raising per - pupil spending, and only 36.7 percent supported an increase in teacher salaries.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has counselled that spending per pupil in schools in England is likely to fall by eight per cent in real terms over the next five years.

According to the report, schools are set to face real - term reduction in spending per pupil for the first time since the 1990s.

For the first time in decades, real per pupil spending will decline this year, forcing school districts to make painful budget choices — providing fewer services with their diminished resources.

Changes in real state spending per pupil are uncorrelated with changes in 4th - grade student achievement in reading.

Real per - pupil spending increased from $ 1,380 in 1966 to $ 7,170 in 2002.

Hanushek and Rivkin have shown that real per - pupil spending began to grow in 1920 and that growth accelerated sharply in the 1960s, before unions had become entrenched.

Stating that allowing parents to use their 529 savings for K - 12 tuition «will erode the tax base that funds public schools» when it will benefit many middle class New Yorkers already taking a 2018 hit with lost state and local deduction opportunities; when the real world state budget impact is demonstrably negligible; and in a state that already spends more per public school pupil than any other — is simply poor public education.

School spending per pupil across England is expected to fall by at least seven per cent in real - terms between 2015 - 16 and 2019 - 20, according to a new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

The research by IFS associate director Luke Sibieta shows that an extra # 1 billion would result in a freeze to per - pupil spending in real terms in 2019 - 2020.

The National Benchmarking Overview Report 2016 - 17 which is compiled by local authorities shows that, since 2010 - 11, real - terms spending per primary and secondary pupil has fallen by 9.6 per cent and 2.9 per cent respectively, which translates as # 513 less per primary pupil and # 205 less per secondary pupil.

The average amount of money spent per pupil by U.S. public schools has more than doubled in real terms since 1970, and the number of pupils per employed teacher has declined from 22 to 15.

To address this, I controlled for real per - pupil spending in the state when the survey respondents were 16 to 17 years old (in other words, respondents who were 18 years of age in 1980 were matched to their states» school spending during the 1978 — 79 school year).

In 2003 the Boston school district spent $ 10,057 per pupil, similar to what Weston spent in 1999 in real dollars.

«It will mean that the total schools budget will increase by # 2.6 bn between this year and 2019/20, and per pupil funding will now be maintained in real terms for the remaining two years of the spending review period to 2019/20,» Ms Greening said.

Per - pupil education spending more than doubled in real terms between 1970 and 2010.

Over the past four decades, real per pupil spending in California has roughly doubled.

The IFS says that, taking those together with pressures «on other costs», it forecasts school spending per pupil will fall by 8 per cent in real terms over the course of this Parliament.

The party said it was protecting per pupil spending in real terms so that teachers have the money they need to deliver great lessons.

The Lib Dems also want to end cuts to education by protecting per - pupil spending «in real terms, including in further education».

We computed real - dollar school budgets, based on actual staff salaries, and found huge within - district variations in per pupil spending.

Since school spending per pupil has been relatively stable in real terms for the last seven years, allocating extra curriculum time and resources to teaching EBacc subjects may have often implied diverting them from non-EBacc subjects that offer less benefit in terms of school performance, as evaluated by the new headline measures.

For instance, public spending per pupil in real terms has more than doubled in both primary and secondary schools over the past 40 years.

But the Institute for Fiscal Studies says this will not match rising pressures on school budgets: «No school will see a cash - terms cut in spending per pupil, but most will see a real - terms cut.»

Schools are set to face real - terms reductions in spending per pupil for first time since the 1990s, it adds.

«Taking these together with pressures on other costs, we forecast that school spending per pupil is likely to fall by around 8 % in real terms [based on a school - specific measure of inflation] between 2014 - 15 and 2019 - 20,» the report says.

Spending per pupil in schools in England is likely to fall by 8 % in real terms over the next five years, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warns.

A new report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies today has also revealed spending per pupil is expected to fall by 6.5 per cent in real terms between 2016 and 2020.

The report stated this will be the «first time schools have seen real - terms cuts in spending per pupil since the mid 1990s», adding it presents a «challenge to continuing to provide high - quality education at every stage».

Although the amount schools receive per - pupil has been protected in real terms by the government, rising payroll costs and other pressures are forcing leaders across England to cut their spending.

The National Audit Office said schools faced an 8 % real - terms reduction in funding per pupil by 2019 - 20 and cost pressures could result in «significant risks» in making the necessary spending cuts.

Due to inflation and rising costs such as National Insurance contributions and pensions, schools have been facing a real - terms cut in spending per pupil, the first in England since the mid-1990s.