Sentences with phrase «real talking points»

You've done some serious research and homework on yourself, and you have real talking points as catalysts for a quality interview.

The real talking points in the latest Microsoft releases are the Surface Pro 4 and more eye - catching, the Surface book (the first truly complete laptab and may be worth buying even at 1 Lakh rupees because of its all round usefulness)

Unless there's a real talking point I'd like to see those press conferences changed.

Scotland and Wales are going to be hugely interesting during this election, with the potential resurgence of the Conservatives in both countries a real talking point following their exceptional local election showing.

The real talking point in SW1 in recent days has concerned the bombshell news that the highly - ambitious housing minister is so stuck - in - his ways that he has exactly the same thing for lunch every day.

It's a real talking point in our kitchen — it's the first thing people notice when they walk in:)

But the real talking point this year has come from the inclusion of Assemble, a London - based collective nominated for a housing rehabilitation project in a working - class neighborhood of Liverpool, where the group, in collaboration with locals, has reclaimed a row of condemned Victorian terrace houses.

This became a real talking point at LegalTech2016.

But the real talking point - apart from the similarity to the iPhone X - is likely to be the colours.

I think the real talking point of this phone is 128 gb ROM.

The real talking point is the overall increase in test scores compared to 2016's flagships.

The real talking point of the Find 5 however isn't the specifications, it's the price.

The dark geometric carpet is a real talking point and practical for such a high - traffic area.

The natural rough finish of the slate plates will create a real talking point amongst your dinner party guests.

The low - key backdrop of textured neutrals offsets works by AJ Crane and Duncan Hannah to create a real talking point in this gorgeous neutral guest bedroom.

Hallways can often be overlooked but the chalkboard wall in this cool, modern home makes a real talking point.

The statement striped wallpaper is a real talking point.

The quirky cluster light is a real talking point, while a gold - framed mirror and a Kartell table lamp add a touch of glam to this space.

Group them together for maximum impact and make them a real talking point.

An understated pattern is perfect for this and can be a real talking point!

The Stag Side Table is the perfect way to add a large dose of character to your home, with the gold antler base helping to make this piece a real talking point.

A chunky concrete - effect worktop that is teamed with white and timber surfaces helps to create an interesting feature that could be a real talking point.

This new design, featuring pages from the chapter on New England from a guide book, is the new way to add literature to feature walls and create a real talking point.

Dark geometric carpet is a real talking point and practical for such a high - traffic area.

«A great sequel to our Annual Tulip Festival, this display is a real talking point for our visitors with 14 different varieties of alliums creating a stunning purple showcase throughout the gardens.»

Not exact matches

Believers in the technology - is - alienating - us theory are quick to point out the real separation is happening in more intimate settings, such as at home, where families aren't talking much at the dinner table because they're all on their phones.

That's where the real value is when we're talking miles & points, especially when you're redeeming points for international premium cabin flights.

I am sure it is true and that is my point here I was commenting on the compassion of a person, not their religion, and momoya had to reveal his / her real agenda that has not pupose here, as I was not talking religion I was talking about compassion and the desire for one individual to help another.

Yet even while it ventures to talk about this man in terms of the God - language of faith, the New Testament does not hesitate to describe this Jesus as a real man and one who points to Him who sent him.

When questioned, however, they can't move beyond these basic catch - phrases or talking points, and they have no real understanding of what they believe.

Cecilia, I am talking about the real topic and that is what those symbols stand for whereas you seem to feel you are strengthening your points by pointing to other references.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Qualities which are purported to make religions «unique» are usually talking points designed to convince the believers that their own faith is more objectively true and real, more fulfilling, than others» - this is essentially religious intolerance with a positive spin instead of a negative one.

But passing off the campaign talking points as real contributions to public debate?

The whole point of my blog is to connect with people in the real world — not to just be a talking head for Christian consumption.

Real Talk: As long as your loaf is sturdy enough, you could make your perpendicular cuts at the bottom all the way to the other end, instead of stopping at the midway point.

As reported by The Express, there has been talk that Real Madrid are set to launch a # 177m bid for the England international, although it's not expected for Tottenham to even consider an exit at any point.

In the first real week of the newyear, Azinger wasn't talking about FedEx Cup points, and neither was anybodyelse.

Get ready for one of the biggest transfer talking points this summer, Danny Ings has been linked with a move to Real Sociedad in Spain, and subsequently rejected them, and now touted with a free transfer to Liverpool this summer.

I'm pointing out that all this «sample size» and «it's early» and «stop being negative» talk is ignoring very real problems with this team because people don't want to believe that maybe, just maybe, the expectations were too high at the start of the season.

Honestly I am really tired of talking about this, but there is no real point of talking about games.

no one can be that delusional without having Wenger blood run through their veins... this team has already conceded 2 of 3 in August and you believe we can get 45 of a potentially 52 available points before Xmas... no wonder this club can't seem to take it's fan - base seriously, albeit I'm sure your assessment would give the Grinch who stole soccer a quarter chub... anyways, enough talk about the criminally insane with internet access... we have much bigger fish to fry... like what were the real objectives behind the choices made by our lame duck manager on the weekend

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

What's the chance that we will be talking about this transfer window and the absence of the signing of a real striker when we will be 10 points out of 1st come February or March?

This could create the real negotiating sticking point in any Stanton talks, as teams trying to acquire Stanton won't want to give up too much for a player they could have for three seasons, while the Marlins can argue that even just three seasons of Stanton should be atop everyone's holiday wish list.

SEE ALSO: FIVE mega talking points from the weekend's PL action, with Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham analysis Gareth Bale to Manchester United IS SURELY ON, after Real Madrid fans smash up Welshman's car!

Many athletes expressed this same problem: by embellishing the «unity» talking point that was co-opted by the league, the protest was simplified and stripped of its real cause.

At one point there was talk that McLaren could switch engines mid-season and although that now seems unlikely, there's a real possibility that it could have a new engine supplier for the 2018 season.

The big talking point for the coming week is Jose Mourinho's Chelsea versus Carlo Ancelotti's Real Madrid, on Wednesday in the Champions Cup final.