Not exact matches
And while it is purely hypothetical in your
particular case, it is nothing short
of reality for tf, hence the reason he defines morality as objective.
In any
case, in the following paragraphs I will first analyze Whitehead's remarks in Process and
Reality on societies as the necessary environment for the ongoing emergence
of actual occasions and then show how this analysis throws unexpected light on Whitehead's further explanation
of the hierarchy
of societies within the current world order, in
particular, the difference between inorganic and organic societies, and, among organic societies, those with a «soul» or «living person» and those without such a central organ
of control.
«It is a version
of an appeal for the protection
of free speech, and in this
case it is a demand that the speech
of particular persons carry the authority to define the structure
of reality without regard to the basis
of past decisions.
For the perfected actuality passes back into the temporal world, and qualifies this world so that each temporal actuality includes it as an immediate fact
of relevant experience» (351) 3 Some interpreters refer also to Whitehead's reference to the «superjective nature»
of God in Process and
Reality: «The «superjective» nature
of God is the character
of the pragmatic value
of his specific satisfaction qualifying the transcendent creativity in the various temporal instances» (88).4 In this
case, however, the actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light
of that
particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification
of the consequent nature.
Actually, in this
particular case, it is not so much suspension
of rational thought as inexperience with the
realities of farming.
For the majority, instead
of looking at hypothetical scenarios that had no bearing on the
reality of the dairy practice in the
particular area
of the clinic, the meaning
of the words had to be clear in the context
of the specific facts
of this
case.
The
reality, however, is that real life problems tend to be messy and complex and may involve multiple areas
of law with lots
of issues and complicating factors with there being no obvious, defining body
of cases or commentary limited to the
particular problem.
However, as this
reality of divorce is that less than 1 %
of cases actually go to trial, it is my belief that this
particular benefit is most often, a moot point.