It's the secret engine inside the archetype of the nerd, the kid who is disengaged from social games but is mesmerized by the bigger game of trying to engage
reality in a fundamental way.
The evidence science produces to support its current conceptualisation of reality reinforces belief in that conceptualisation because the questions set by scientists are framed on the assumption that the conceptualisation is correctly describing
reality in fundamental ways.
Not exact matches
The evidence for it is less clearly found
in Process and
Reality than
in Religion
in the Making, yet it seems to be present
in the philosophy of Whitehead
in such a
way that this third argument is really more
fundamental than the two just summarized.
However, beyond this level of conviction, life
in a community also produces a primary perspective, a basic
way of understanding the nature of things, a
fundamental vision of
reality.
In contrast, the approach to the reality of the divine which I have termed «the way of distinction» draws a fundamental difference between God and the world, and exercises considerable effort to maintain this difference in the face of recurring tendencies to weaken or erase i
In contrast, the approach to the
reality of the divine which I have termed «the
way of distinction» draws a
fundamental difference between God and the world, and exercises considerable effort to maintain this difference
in the face of recurring tendencies to weaken or erase i
in the face of recurring tendencies to weaken or erase it.
When «perception» is limited to the material presented to our minds by the five senses we are by no means dealing yet
in a
fundamental way with the
reality of the world.
The succession of scientific discoveries and revolutions
in physics over the last 500 years have led to
fundamental paradigm shifts (Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962)
in the
way that science conceives of the
reality of this universe both on the cosmological scale and
in the subatomic realm, and perhaps even beyond this universe.
Developments
in physics over the last 500 years have changed the
way that man thinks about the
reality in which he lives
in three
fundamental ways.
Following Whitehead, we see the appearance of mass
in the world as a
fundamental element
in the
way that a complex, resilient society might approach
reality and survive.
Ritschl was one of the few theologians to expand on his insights,» considering the solidarity of the race as the
fundamental condition of religion, plunging us corporately into sin and making
way for a new corporate
reality of righteousness
in Christian salvation.
For then it would be open to question whether one is dealing with a concept which is possible but which can correspond to no possible
reality, or rather with the concept of something truly real.9
In contrast to these different possible dialectical ways in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extende
In contrast to these different possible dialectical
ways in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extende
in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the
fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extended.
While an unprepared reading of Process and
Reality can only with difficulty remove the prejudices which Whitehead himself conditioned with his unfortunate exposition, there is another
way to demonstrate very well that Whitehead's cosmology
in fact proposes a new determination of the «realistic basis,» and even that this new determination has already put behind it a
fundamental discussion with culturally well - seasoned «realisms,»
in whose name the consistency of Whitehead's relativistic cosmology has been called into doubt.
One
way to contrast archaic and modern society, or rather the modern West and all traditional societies, archaic or historic, is to point out, as Louis Dumont following Alexis de Tocqueville has been doing
in recent years, that traditional societies are characterized by hierarchy whereas modern societies are characterized by equality — at least
in ideal.6 This contrast is rooted not just
in political ideology but
in fundamental conceptions of the nature of
reality.
In this very
way, the person is capacitated for a
fundamental and profound relationship with all of created
reality.
Architecture of Life, the inaugural exhibition
in BAMPFA's landmark new building, explores the
ways that architecture — as concept, metaphor, and practice — illuminates various aspects of life experience: the nature of the self and psyche, the
fundamental structures of
reality, and the power of the imagination to reshape our world.
At its most
fundamental, painting is about the nature of looking, and the power of the reflection has always mystified us as the secondary version of
reality —
in much the same
way as painting itself.
People need to reconnect with nature (and
reality)
in a
fundamental way before technological and economic solutions will be implemented.
Now;
in case you think there's some distantly possible
way you know this is capable of happening, congratulations: you have made it to
fundamental law number two, before you fell out of contention for the title «Grasper of
Reality.»
The new
reality is that an increasing number of Canadians believe that public institutions have no business placing dogmatic restrictions (or lending approval to such restrictions) on an LGBTQ person's ability to express their
fundamental identity or formalize their loving relationship
in equal
ways to others.