Not exact matches
I would say all sides come to the forefront, but I think that some of us see things from more than one side to begin with and that there are many «sides» (perspectives) that are out there, I don't think it is a polemic, and I don't think it is «sides»
in terms of choosing sides
in a war... more a dialogue where
confrontations take place, but (hopefully) most of the time not with the intent of winners and losers (or, if that is the intent, that hopefully we
realize that and adjust our own rhetoric to move away from that pardigm)
These are fully -
realized characters, and rarely does a simple conversation or
confrontation ring false
in «The Intervention,» except for maybe one of its broader scenes.
Before anyone intervenes
in a physical
confrontation between two cats, it's important to
realize that fighting is a last resort
in feline circles and the cats involved will be
in a high state of emotional arousal.
With the aim to create something different from his previous pieces, he painted the canvas
in red and
realized that it works only with yellow and blue, making the
confrontation with the work of Piet Mondrian.
(Continuing reply to John Gottman): I
realize that a core dilemma for me is that I feel comfortable only when I'm
in an empathic, supportive mode and am out of my comfort zone when «harsh»
confrontation seems to be
in order.
This workshop will provide strategies for discerning angry and bullying overcompensating modes and for effectively addressing them, including
realizing and differentiating these modes, getting aware and using our personal schema activations and using them for effective empathic
confrontation and limit setting, that help patients safely experience childhood origins and verbalize links to the emotional messages imbedded
in their anger leading to a replacement of overshooting angry reactions by healthy and adaptive responses.