My process is
really about interpretation — I am constantly reinterpreting seemingly finite information.
Not exact matches
The problem with this kind of
interpretation is that these interpreters were mistaking phenomenological language, which describes appearances, with ontological language, which tells us
about things as they
really are.
So, one Gnostic
interpretation of the Cain and Abel story might be that it isn't
really about Cain's wickedness at all.
I found her comments
about «translation and
interpretation» and the diversity of personal experience when hearing the same piece of music
really intriguing.
For that reason, even when I found myself wondering
about the
interpretation of certain texts and mentally entertaining the idea that I could be wrong and that maybe this
really is sinful, I have never felt any real uncertainty or doubt
about what I am doing.
But, for the record... I see a tremendous amount of Christians arguing with other «Christians»
about what God
really means and who's got the right
interpretation of which Bible verse.
The impression you will get from the book is that the authors are simply teaching what Jesus, Paul, and John
really thought and cared
about, when in reality, what you will be getting is a strong Calvinistic
interpretation of the New Testament.
Bob, again you are talking
about yourself, it's perfectly clear that you
really don't even understand the bible or Christian history, which is why your
interpretation of the bible is wrong.
You know what the
really cool thing is
about your
interpretation, ReadJC?
This creativity to justify a particular
interpretation of scripture is akin to what Piper is doing here, not realizing that there is
really nothing
about «maleness» and «femaleness» that justifies rejecting a woman who is called to serve in the role of a pastor and who does so with wisdom, skill and compassion.
So true
about Michael Oliver being the best ref by a mile; even when I disagree with him on something I always feel he is either completely justified in his decision or at least it was a very 50/50 decision that
really comes down to an unbiased
interpretation.
Both
interpretations are
about distractions: What is keeping you from focusing on what's
really meaningful?
Gidding met with Jackson, told her his
interpretation of the novel as being
really about a mental patient who's been institutionalized and that all the events of the book can be explained as manifestations of her psychosis, only to be decisively told by Jackson that her book was «a ghost story.»
Michael's reasons for picking Stallone, and his
interpretation of what Sly's films are
really about, is a must - listen.
This commentary is much more
about the film's hidden meanings and
interpretations than the usual «this day was
really tough on set» anecdotes.
This is perhaps why there are so many different
interpretations, so many different theories
about what is
really going on behind the curtain.
He asks his audience to question what traditions they
really know, and how those concepts came
about, given layers of
interpretation.
If art is
really about what it means to us as an event, and less concerned with object - driven
interpretation and aesthetics, then what is the difference between Turrell's work and the thrills of an amusement park ride?
So, indeed, get the text, and then maybe also write something
about how this book has
really gone off in a biased way here — putting in personal
interpretations rather than helping students gain insight into how to approach challenging scientific questions (maybe also cover how the IPCC experience grew out of the CFC - ozone experience and how the Montreal Protocol has worked, etc..
And empty space, as you know it, is not
really empty, here is a quote
about it: The physical
interpretation of the cosmological constant as vacuum energy density is supported by the existence of the «zero point» energy predicted by quantum mechanics.
The new study [Samanta, and by implication Saleska since the observations agree] contributes to our understanding of
interpretations of data retrieved from satellites, but it does not prove or disprove anything
about what is
really happening on the ground.
Bill McMullin... I
really appreciate you enlightening the readers
about the reality versus armchair
interpretations of the Competition Bureau's intent.