Sentences with phrase «really argue against»

With $ 30M of revenue and counting for an investment of maximum two million, you can't really argue against this decision.

What the backgrounds do though is add a sense of scale and you see first hand the sheer vastness of Eggman's destruction and there's nothing to really argue against the visuals being really rather terrific.

Everyone values biz differently but no one can really argue against such a small price premium.

You can't really argue against it.

It's hard to really argue against Zidane though as he was a more than worthy winner, with the Real Madrid boss continuing his incredible streak of winning trophies with the La Liga title and the Champions League last season.

What he was really arguing against was hypocrisy and not religion.

Not exact matches

How many times have we argued with someone knowing they were really right, yet we just won't give in due to that darn ego,» says Donald Burns, a 33 - year veteran of the restaurant industry who warns against shutting out other perspectives.

It's like arguing against «corporate personhood» or claiming that Barack Obama is a «socialist»: all you're doing is demonstrating to the world that you don't know what the words you're using really mean.

The sort of thing I would have thought that no one would really want to argue against in this day and age, yet here you are, calling me a «fear - monger» and talking like I was against anyone using their life experiences to make decisions.

Just as he did in the garden of Eden, he whispers, «Did God really say...» (Genesis 3:1) He questions us, confuses us and argues against us until we are confused.

† Christians do not really exist, they just pretend that they believe in God and argue with non-religious people while not knowing very much at all regarding Christianity or the meaning of the bible and disregarding half of what the bible says only to strongly vocalize their stance against the other half of the bible that is against things that they either do not understand or that do not affect them personally.

If the monument brings comfort and peace to people you really can not argue against it.

I argue against traditionalists who say that there are not 66 million Catholics in the U.S. but only ten or twenty million, or fewer, who qualify as being really Catholic.

you can argue against the existence of God and a spiritual realm, but you can never really prove it.

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

I argued against evolutionist teachers and students, but I never really cared about science except to defend my faith.

You have to really argue to be against data.

This is on what these two are truly arguing; Wenger uses the cup as an example against Neville but Neville isn't really belittling our ability to win games, but rather, that in the long run of a whole season it is more likely for us to drop points due to relying purely on skill which is far more linked to form then something like physicality.

Which nobody can argue against really, and most people already do give him his fair due on this one.

You can't argue with that really and they have scored at least three goals in each of their last three against them and at least two in each of their nine.

While some Libertarians are against compulsion on principle, I know of no one really that would argue against the idea that education isn't necessary for republican forms of government in principle.

«The Christopher Columbus statue (in Columbus circle) is really about honoring Italian - Americans and the contribution of Italian - Americans,» Cuomo told reporters, arguing it's not so much about the explorer himself, who he acknowledged had a troubling record of atrocities against Native Americans.

Lawyers for former State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son Adam today argued that the federal corruption charges against the pair — which allege that the elder Mr. Skelos obtained posh jobs for the younger from companies with business before the state — really tell a heartwarming tale of a «caring and concerned» father and his «rude,» «volatile» and «immature and emotional» 33 - year - old boy.

«It carries a really big wallop to the thinking part of the brain, which has to argue for or against it,» Brizendine says.

But its cynical poison is deadlier towards Hollywood as a piece of satire, arguably arguing against Auteurism (even though, historically speaking, it wasn't really a -LSB-...]

To Amy's point about the difference between a role where Tom really gets to act, in the classical sense, versus one where he stages He - Man battles against CGI and his own «I do my own stunts, thankyouverymuch» mortality, I'd argue that a number of his best turns feature him capital - A Acting his way through He - Man battles against his own emotions.

Even though he already has one, I might start to think Geoffrey Rush is the one to beat since it's hard to argue against someone like Rush having two Oscars and if they really like King's Speech but think it's a bit too «traditional» for Best Picture these days... hmm.

Well, Ed Next managed to find someone to argue for and against the quality of Common Core standards, producing a really excellent and illuminating exchange.

«She's raising money for Goliath,» Diane Ravitch says of Rhee, arguing that if there really is some monstrous force of special interests — «the blob» — working against children, it isn't the beleaguered unions.

And, by the way, it really was just one line he seemed to dislike — the point of the post was to argue against spending yet more taxpayer dough on an education - centered stimulus, not for complete separation of school and state.

Even if the audience is here, we could argue that it's good for the series at least, but what it does is it anihilates the potential of the series getting recognition from the mainstream and really going up against western rpgs AS IT SHOULD because mechanically it's clever and filled with idea that SHOULD have a global influence on the genre.

It's hard to argue against 2017 being one of the best years for gaming since... well, one of the best of all time, really.

And, looking at BioWare's upcoming Mass Effect Trilogy box on sale November 6th for the PC and Xbox 360, I don't really think I can argue against it.

«There is really no single poem,» Spicer came to believe; he argued that «poems should echo and re-echo against each other.

Amazingly (not really) Krugman takes this crap for granted and proceeds to argue against another bogus claim.

I really donâ $ ™ t see how anybody can argue against that (unless one heads into serious pseudoscientific territory).

If it were really necessary to tax fossil carbon to get the world's energy supply transferred to something else, I would be willing to stop arguing against it.

It really doesn't make any sense for anyone to argue against it, unless they are absolutely sure that climate sensitivity is very low.

If Goldacre really wants to stick his neck out, why doesn't he try arguing against a rich, powerful, bullying Climate - Change establishment which includes all three British main political parties, the National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, the Prince of Wales, the Prime Minister, the President of the USA, the EU, the UN, most schools and universities, the BBC, most of the print media, the Australian Government, the New Zealand Government, CNBC, ABC, the New York Times, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, most of the rest of the City, the wind farm industry, all the Big Oil companies, any number of rich charitable foundations, the Church of England and so on?

But late Tuesday night, Harvard history professor Naomi Oreskes and her colleague Geoffrey Supran published a report conceding that #ExxonKnew was never really about what Exxon «knew,» but instead was focused on punishing the company for arguing against specific climate policy proposals.

Those issues were eventually resolved (not to mention, rendered moot by his loss), but now the accusations regarding failure to meet constitutional citizenship requirements are being levied against Obama, with groups arguing that the president - elect wasn't really born in Hawaii, or alternatively, that he renounced his U.S. citizenship when he moved to Indonesia as a child.

Yeah, it really is hard to argue against the design concept of the Galaxy Alpha.

It is surprising how many spouses admit to automatically arguing against their spouse before they have really listened to and considered what has been said.