Sentences with phrase «really big error»

I'd say after 20 picks, based on the day of the picks, James falling is the only really big error in this mock, outside of Rudolph.

Not exact matches

we had some really nice moments with lacazette jack sanchez and ozil hinting at what could have been... and dominated for 75 minutes... but in the other 15 there was some real horror shows with bellerin a real shocker but whatever steve bold understands by defencing he needs to think again... some of the gaps left were basic defending errors but again the failure to press is what is upsetting given the wages these guys are on... working hard should not be a big ask!!

The problem lies in the fact that Kante would have had a bigger and more positive influence on the team overall and so missing out on him twice, if the opportunity was really there, is the real problem and it's an error that Arsenal could now come to regret.

It was a long process for KJ to really get the hang of going potty like a big boy, and it was filled with trial and error.

The Governor's second biggest error wasn't the NY SafeAct, it was sadly getting sucked into the idea that the IDC Coalition would deliver on his legislative agenda, which as Stewart - Cousins points out hasn't really happened in a big way to date.

One of the biggest errors made in having «cheat days» is that these are often really just «binges» without attention to the quality of food eaten.

PS: I hate to say there are so many, but back to what I said about it being a lot of trial and error, that's really a big part of doing it on your own.

A government study found that 26 % of consumers have at least one potentially material error that makes them look like a bigger risk than they really are.

And, as an aside, once PPACA [Obamacare] really kicks in, part - time work may become even bigger; very ill - thought out law, unforced error $ $

How much bigger must the error bars really be because of adjustment uncertainty and proper accounting of uncertainty in the averaging?

In other terms, If your goal were to show that the IPCC got something wrong (say sensitivity boundaries) then you really have to find big errors in temperature.

How come all errors in these reports seem to show the problem as being bigger than it really is?

One interpretation of Fig. 4 is that there is no real missing energy because the error bars are not adequately accounted for and they are quite big, especially for OHC changes from 1 year to the next (e. g., Lyman et al. 2010), but that is really the point here.

It's easy to focus on that 1 % when you didn't use the right format for a pleading, turned away a great case by accident, or made a strategic error that seemed like the end of the world, but really wasn't a big deal.

And when we look at the breakdown of those claims, unfortunately, despite our best efforts, the most common errors and biggest malpractice risks really haven't changed over the last 10 years.

As far as a potential impact on his kids, the much bigger problem would be if he's lying on his resume (since there's it's clearly deliberate, whereas on LinkedIn it could be user error)-- and that's something you can't / won't really be able to know.

And they can never believe they have really made that big a rookie error.