Sentences with phrase «really changed the agenda»

I think the Paris Agreement really changed the agenda for climate science.

SB: Well, I think I would start by thinking about the Paris Agreement, because that's really changed the agenda for climate science now.

Not exact matches

Third, he criticizes the Liberals for pursuing their progressive trade policies in these talks: «Did anyone really think that the Liberals could somehow force the Trump administration into enacting their agenda — union power, climate change, aboriginal claims, gender issues?

its ridiculous and embarrassing and goes to show that the real agenda from both wenger and the board is keeping the books straight its the continual party line of «in the summer, we'll do this» then the player is unavailable there used to be a time not that long ago when you knew that whoever they brought in was going to be class, now you know that whoever they bring in will be cheap and wont do much of a job, Sanchez has been the only real good bit of transfer business and I mean really good bit since we were supposed to be free of financial restraints makes you wonder if we ever really had any as its still not changed.

/ / I really do not think Chelsea will be helped this season, in fact it looks to me like the agenda has changed.

«We really need to work over a long period of time and help the community understand what's being proposed, so that groups like New York Communities for Change and others can't come in with their own agenda and hijack the conversation,» she told TRD.

«We're really hoping that encouraging community - engaged research, in not just Native American communities but in all diverse ethnic populations, as a broad agenda, will not only change how researchers interact with potential participants but also make research more equitable for all diverse and nondiverse populations,» Tsosie said.

Rather, he says, «We're really just trying to answer questions and give people the results so districts and states and the federal government can decide how to change the agenda.»

*** «What does make it a failure is if they were unable to capitalise on the changes to the point where simply meeting the status - quo would have been a better game... and quite frankly from the review it doesn't sound like that» *** *** «I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.»

People can read about it at theleap.org, which is really about connecting the dots between racial injustice, climate change, austerity, migration justice, and developing a holistic, transformative agenda, which I think is most urgent — the most urgent project for progressives with or without climate change.

What this represents is a lack of unity over whether climate change really belongs on the agenda.

The one significant book on the subject I've come across (and I haven't looked exhaustively, so please enlighten me if there is more out there) The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power Knowledge Norms Discourses, ME Pettenger really deals only with the question of how climate change advocacy fails to capture the policy aChange: Power Knowledge Norms Discourses, ME Pettenger really deals only with the question of how climate change advocacy fails to capture the policy achange advocacy fails to capture the policy agenda.

To this day have we really seen the developent of a large community of environmental scientists with a well - orchestrated climate change impacts research agenda and taking the lead in pushing for it?

by Matthew Hardin, FME Counsel When Attorneys General from seventeen states banded together in a political crusade to «investigate» and threaten to prosecute those who disagree with their climate change agenda, E&E Legal decided to pull back the curtains to expose what the states were really looking for, and what might have spurred these investigations, -LSB-...]

What really belies the agenda of the so - called skeptics is that they're as cocksure about the likelihood of failure, waste, and unbearable cost associated with policies to control greenhouse gas emissions as they are unconvinced about the risks of climate change.

When Attorneys General from seventeen states chose to band together in a political crusade to «investigate» and threaten to prosecute those who disagree with their climate change agenda, E&E Legal decided to pull back the curtains to expose what the states were really looking for, and what might have spurred these investigations, which trample the First Amendment rights of dissenting scientists and policy researchers.