Sentences with phrase «really check your facts»

Not exact matches

Which raises the question: Does all of the fact - checking really matter?

I really would rather people DID care about sexism, rape culture, and fact checking, though.

... you really need to check your facts, Denmark is predominately Christian, same with Norway and Finland but there is a majority that do not fit into any one particular major religious group.

Total invasion... because you are a public figure I find that we can't really sue the media and the press and I found that really disturbing... They just write whatever they want without checking the facts.»

Many organizations have launched fact - check operations on the premise that the skeptics are really just suffering from a fact deficit.

I really wish people would fact check before putting shit like this up and giving people false info.

So I really like to fact check things.

Many shall admit to the fact that we are busy juggling to create a work - life balance, and at times it becomes really hard to keep a check on the health.

«I love the fact that you can really get to know someone by reading his essays and by checking out his answers to your match questions.»

That is right, the fact is even Pew Research center has documented how common it is for people to check out a possible online date so why not discuss what really happens!

The fact that you have to obtain a membership in order to really check out a member's profile is a little bit frustrating; however, with the amount of members that turn up in a search, a membership is definitely worth it.

They should of really done more fact checking.

Doing some fact checking on M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening on IMDB, I noticed that they've filled in a bunch of holes for his top secret Sundowning, which is being pegged at the director's first micro-budgeted feature (although, $ 5M doesn't really sound «micro» to me).

So quick, in fact, that they failed to check if there really was a meaningful connection.

Let's check the results in a couple of years with the same people and cars... It is not really a good comparison of brands, domestic vs «imports» since most problems will show up over time... Let's see a two or five year comparison of a Chevy vs. Toyota, or Chrysler vs. Subaru, or Ford vs. Nissan... I could be wrong, in fact I actually hope so; however, based on my experience I don't think the results would be the same as in the INITIAL quality survey...

We really hadn't intended on buying another Altima due to the fact it basically looks like our 2013, but after checking out the competition and being able to get the features that we wanted at a price we could afford, the refreshed Altima made it an easy choice.

Taken in what appears to be an analog photographer's darkroom, the shot doesn't really reveal anything we didn't already expect such as a front end that looks to be a somewhat more aggressive interpretation of the company's latest E-Class, LED daytime running lights modeled after a tilted check mark, and the fact that it comes in red.

I guess it could be argued that the market will weed out the bad stuff, but really, self - published books that haven't been edited, fact checked, or proofed give this entire industry a bad reputation.

Well, to be honest, I really can't think of anything other than the fact that they don't have physical branches and that they don't offer checking accounts.

If your car breaks down or you're in an accident, what you may need is to pay the mechanic — but maybe your insurance is covering that and what you really need is grocery money, or to be able to write a check for the rent that won't bounce, despite the fact that you missed a few days of work when your car was inoperable.

Also, check your credit card terms; many have a «warranty extension» policy built into them to encourage you to make large purchases on the card — and the fact that they can afford to offer this essentially as a loss leader tells you what warranty extension is really worth in the average case.

For several years I resisted setting up online bill payment because I liked the fact that by getting a bill in the mail, it (A) forced me to review the charges and verify their accuracy and think about why we are spending that much and how we might reduce it in the future, and (B) the physical act of writing the check made it a bit more real than we were really spending that money and that it was flowing out and we (in most cases) would not be seeing it again.

I'm not a big message board user — especially when it comes to investing — so I don't really have a comment on this one other than the fact that it's owned by E * Trade doesn't make me want to run and check it out.

And if you really want to know what's going on, check out a local puppy class and chat with the owners; they'll give you the cold, hard facts regarding what it's really like to live with a puppy.

And while all that was nice, what really convinced me to drop a quarter of my college tuition reimbursment check on the system was the fact that it doubled as a pretty decent DVD player, which at time was the hot new technology on the market and not a common item in the living room.

This is the kind of basic, blatant mistake that really should have been caught by the most superficial of quality control checks, and the fact that it made it into a release version seems to speak to the enormous pressure the small team at Hello Games must have been under to get the thing out the door.

Part of me really enjoyed knowing that when I put my work under renewed scrutiny (it had already been throughly fact - checked), it still held up.

In fact, Oreskes and the others were using a garbled conglomeration of nearly a dozen different memos from different sources that were collected by Greenpeace and posted unsorted and in no rational order on one of its websites — because they never checked who they really came from.

You really should check out the facts yourself instead of relying on misinformational opiniations.

If the Post's editorial page editors really do believe in fact - checking and in «respected and informed viewpoints,» I can only conclude that they slept in very late this morning.

What I found when I fact - checked you (something that any good journalist or scientist really must do) is that your claims were unsupportable and fatally flawed.

Though I do hope you webcast the debate in some manner, I've often found a problem with these debates (at least if conducted honestly) is that they turn on citations, data, etc which really can't be checked in the limited amount of time available during the debate, so they turn into people flatly denying each other's facts.

It's worthwhile calling out his manifold errors of fact, and reasoning, and I find the definition of «fact checking» as supplied by the WaPo ombudsman to be appalling, really no better than junior high - school level.

If it really wanted to, Twitter could not only use its own algorithms to generate aggregated content in interesting ways, it could start to accumulate a suite of tools that allow users and even journalists to do the same — whether it's something like Storify or Storyful (which has a paid - for Pro version that helps media companies verify and fact - check the content they are collecting) or another curation / discovery service like Prismatic or Percolate, or even a consumption and recommendation app like Flipboard.

The writers here really need to check their facts before reporting.

Whether it's through a reference check or due to the fact that you're not really that great at the software you claimed mastery of in your resume, time will expose exaggerations and mistruths.

(There's a really good ABC Fact Check on the different ways of calculating the pay difference of graduates and non-graduates.

If you really need to know the facts in this specific case, check the bankruptcy filing.