Not exact matches
The system doesn't
really work with a midfielder
playing as one of the front 3 so Campbell coming through has at least meant we remain
dangerous.
When these guys learn how to
play around him, and
really start to gel, they'll be even more
dangerous than they already are.
kokorin has a lot of speed and technique.he makes his average team look
really dangerous n he can
play rw and lw.we wanted a different striker.walkout was neva my first choice so lets hope for de best.coyg
, His outputs are very low compared to the media attention he gets for staying or leaving..................... We've had better players, when they left we survived not to talk of a mentally reserved footballer (ozil) and a player that gets bullied when he tries to get to
dangerous positions.............................. you should know what I mean if you
really know how football is
played.
I wouldn't say we have turned a corner but we're certainly going in the right direction both mentally and tactically...
Really Le Prof is going vintage lately putting the right tactics and players on the field making the right subs too (after the subs he made WHU were tired and Giroud who was at heart of every
dangerous attack killed the game off)... Ramsey performance was great, Özil (missed some great opportunities in final 3rd) and Coquelin missed a couple of passes but solid
play from both... I think people don't understand how Özil passes is important for the fluidity of our game....
We'll have to see where he lines up tomorrow, but he
played really well in the derby and sent in some
dangerous crosses and did well on the third goals.
But a tactical change could see him dominate Barca's midfield for long and his natural understanding with Messi (they have been
playing together for ages) would make Barca's attack
really dangerous once again.
This is always a
dangerous game to
play at Old Trafford, even with a two - goal lead and we
really had to dig in.
So it's not so much with the object that they are
really playing with, it's at times
dangerous.
Gwynne
plays it straight here as the stern sensible stoic aging leader dressed smartly in a suit and fedora, that classic attire
really suits him (no pun intended) giving him both a dashing and
dangerous look.
I get that Zemeckis, who co-wrote the screenplay with Christopher Browne, is trying to capture that whimsical zest for life Petit had, but it would have been more effective to
play into the
dangerous and illegal aspects to
really show off how fearless and crazy he was to try to attempt such a daring act.
The filmmaker
really broke out internationally with «Heavenly Creatures,» his poetic tale of magical realism that centered on the
dangerous romance between two (ultimately) murderous teen girls
played by a young Kate Winslet and a young Melanie Lynskey.
While you can
play this game alone, Lovers in a
Dangerous Spacetime
really opens up when you and three other players control the various weapons and gadgets aboard your spaceship.
Even local developers are making games for US audiences and that
really pisses me off so much, not because of nationalism, I have no quarrel with any country and I know they do it to
play it «safe», but the idea of simply missing the chance to develop your own market because you want to
play with the «big boys» is not only stupid from a marketing point of view, it's downright
dangerous, you CA N'T compete with monster - like comapnies unless you are big enough yourself, you are just gonna get swallowed and turned into another subsidiary for EA before you get to make anything that's worth remembering, and worse, before you make anything that makes you happy as a developer.
Lovers in a
Dangerous Spacetime —
Really fun only if
played with 3 to 4 players.
It's a bit of a muddy situation because Elite
Dangerous really is a great game with a lot of potential, but is that worth the 2x purchase price in order to
play it?