Sentences with phrase «really good claim»

But here's the thing: if a party (or lawyer) has a really good claim or defense, they raise it in the pleadings.

Not exact matches

BTW, while companies claim to want «well - rounded individuals,» what they really mean is that they want employees who can do multiple jobs.

Rather than assuming suppliers are telling the truth or being ambivalent over the difficulty of verifying claims, product producers and suppliers would do well to acknowledge just how limited their quality - control reach really is.

If aboriginal people in this region are ever to progress at the rate expected by politicians and others it is essential that they have the ability to be both economocally and culturally «independent» of those who claim to know best how to address the issues but really have no prolonged on the ground experience.

However, there are really simple — and inexpensive — ways to get your cold brew done at home, and you'll find five of the best options below, with everything from the $ 19 Takeya pitcher to the new and exciting Dash Rapid Cold Brew System, which claims to be the world's first rapid system.

Second, it is very easy for a vendor to claim, «We use natural language processing», and you will never know whether it really works, or is better than another vendor's NLP.

Well, we think that all of these claims are just marketing tricks and nothing really works as described on their sales page.

Mr. Anglin has a habit of saying what he thinks — which, despite the claims of the Wildrose Party and other right - wing Western Canadian political groups that's how elected officials should act, doesn't really go over that well in the real world of politics.

But then you really have to hide out from linguistics, psychology, biology, sociology, physics, astronomy and archaeology to buy all the weird bible claims, so I guess they should be well practiced.

This is a video that shows really well how to be non-objective, subjective, and make unsupported claims while appearing to be intelligent, smart, and clear.

Well, let's just say I have my proof, and claims like must upset you, like a guy with a ferrari telling you that it's within your reach, but you'll probably never get one, because you don't really believe it's possible.

@ HappyMeal calling people filthy really isn't cool, and I'm Catholic I have a few atheist friends they aren't evil or bad or anything sure they can claim some not true offensive things but it's all good, please keep your peace

God has seen entirely enough of our crooked government who really can not lay claim to being much better than that of Moumoar Gadafi, who CNN keeps putting down.

Well I couldn't resist (ineptly) posting that photo of the reef - rock that China and the Philippines both claim, but doing so perhaps made the topic seem more humorous than it really is.

Rick, it is better to be honest and frustrated about not having the answers, then decisively claim to have them, and not be willing to admit you really don't....

What are we really talking about when we claim that globalization offers the world's poor a chance to be much better off?

At best philosophers can express our hopes; they have no claim on the «truth» nor can they tell us how things really are.

If we can really assure ourselves by natural reason that God exists then that is not an article of faith, and the same goes for Christ's divinity, if, as apologists claim, we have good rational grounds for thinking that he claimed to be divine, that he was neither mad nor a fraud, and that he rose from the dead.

If they do not have the good works to back up their claim, then they never really had eternal life to begin with.

Chad, you are really really good and posting claims like these and stating they are fact.

In fact, it seems fair to say that the most common criticism process theists level against the God of classical free will theism is the claim that if such a being really existed and were wholly good, we should expect to see displays of divine coercive power more often.

If dogmatic theology really does prove beyond dispute that a God with characters like these exists, she may well claim to give a solid basis to religious sentiment.

the ones that really have the best claim to being the «true» church.

where's the «democracy» you are claiming that you have,, tell me exactly are a religious nations, racist nations,, do you really care of the ppl despite their religions or with their religions,, let's say you have the chance to kick them out,, would u kick the native British Muslims out as well,, do u have the rights??

Claiming to know God and walk with Him while not caring for the poor (Big on God's heart), not being good stewards for the environment He gave us, and not being responsible common sense citizens, doesn't make sense at all, and frankly casts doubt wheather you really have encountered Jesus or know His heart...

Surely this flight may not really be caused by sober objectivity, and a man may even pretend to venerate the incomprehensible silence while his whole attitude actually remains an escape and he only wants a superficial and guilt - ridden well - being in order to escape from the claim of the incomprehensible.

He also observes that it claims that man is essentially alone in the universe and that he is better off if he is made fully aware of this loneliness.5 However, Hartshorne enters the counterclaim that, if man believes that he really is all by himself in an unfriendly universe, then man will realize that he is not worthy of his own supreme devotion and will also become an easy prey for the race - worship and nation - worship that wreak havoc on mankind.6 He further charges that humanism suffers from the specific disease of «megalomania» or wishing to be God.7

Our doctrine, then, makes no claim that we are really good and loving beings.

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

We are all human, and humans will do bad things, it is when you claim that you are morally better because of your made - up religion that really irks people.

I'm going to do a big social media cull now (obviously not Ella) but there are a certain few people who claim to be so positive, but really I think there is a fine line between being positive (i.e. look at me, I've 3 kids, a full time job, a flat tummy, and I'm a healthy eater, non stop good doer, if you can do it I can too person) and just being annoying and making you feel inadequate as I can't juggle all of those things at all and constantly feel overwhelmed!!

It's not all about who claims what label; it's about really good and healthy recipes, and that's what you deliver.

When companies marketed «biodegradable» plastic garbage bags despite the fact that nothing really biodegrades well in landfills, who trashed those claims?

By Staci Davidson any companies claim to be the best at providing their particular product or service, but how to they really prove it?

Everyone can claim to have the best prices and the freshest product, Amigos no doubt delivers in those categories but what really sets them apart is their uncanny ability to connect with their customer.

Its even boring talking about Arsenal's transfers, sometimes I even use to think if wenger really means good for this club as he claimed to be, or may be he is just clueless old man or Why every team BUT 6u8xxg arsenal??

That leaves USC — with a conference title and injury claims offsetting minimal quality wins and a really bad loss — or Georgia — with no division title and a pretty bad loss offsetting a steadier schedule and at least two good wins — at No. 4.

What really fcuks me off most is that many of you jump on the positives and claim to be hard ass gooners when the goings good, but come the day, you all turn on the club.

Both claim that he had a really good (not great) 2016 - 2017, but has been pretty average otherwise.

So we can't really claim what's best for him or not.

but all can claim better records in last five years... Management failure is down to wenger's mindset and it's not a winning one... That simple really... So good piece at last

As much as the stats claim we haven't really missed him, we most certainly do with the extra numbers with the lack of options available in the centre at present, although the balance between Le Coq and Ramsey may well prove to work well.

That's over a billion folks, and really makes the economists claims of moving well worth the pain of moving, and yes, I was being massively sarcastic.

But our centre forward also claims that he does not really need the credit or criticism from the media to judge himself by, as he knows full well if he has been doing the business on the pitch or not.

We know the Philadelphia 76ers player was there to have a good time, but did he really catch a ball, as he claimed on Twitter?

In Cazorla's absence we need to find a better balance, but our options are limited, as we've only really got Coquelin and Elneny who can claim to be defensive midfielders and both have their limitations.

I wasn't really into the Lions until Barry was Barry and we were suddenly good, so I can't claim anything about his being drafted.

Here's what I really don't get: other big clubs are snapping up players, very good players with factually good performance statistics, but Arsene claims he's found no one gOod enough in the margood players with factually good performance statistics, but Arsene claims he's found no one gOod enough in the margood performance statistics, but Arsene claims he's found no one gOod enough in the margOod enough in the market.

As it stands, this squad is fairly well positioned to compete for the Wenger Cup and make a deep run in the Europa, if and only if we play first stringers in Europe and use the bench for the League and FA Cups... that being said, and based on the fragility of the manager and the team in recent campaigns, it's more likely that Wenger will focus on a top 4 finish and the FA Cup... while the reasons for such an approach may appear logical, it would confirm a rather disturbing trend and appear counter intuitive for any team which claims to have higher aspirations... I feel that Wenger simply can't afford to put all his eggs in the Europa basket because if he fails the potential backlash could cripple any top 4 chances due to the aforementioned fragile psyche that tends to rear it's ugly head like our own personal groundhog day each and every February... furthermore, can you even imagine Wenger bringing in the necessary recruits to adequately supply top quality lineups in a Thursday / Sunday dominated schedule; based on everything I've seen in recent years, I can't see that happening... in fact, mark my words, it's more likely that we see Lacazette playing out wide in Alexis's position with Giroud at striker, than we see Wenger make the necessary moves to right this ship... god, I hope I'm wrong but is it really that far - fetched considering what we've witnessed for past several years

If you are an Arsenal fan and you really claim to want Arsenal to succeed, better check yourself first and determine what kind of fan you are because one thing is for sure.