Sentences with phrase «really high data»

I could only see this being used for BlackBerry users who have really high data rates.

Not exact matches

«What we see is that customers who have higher data plans use more data and are the customers that really are the ones that can benefit from things like safety mode,» she said.

We believe that connecting attitude, emotion and intent data to the broader transactional data ecosystem is foundational to really understanding your customers and, ultimately, delivering higher quality insight.

And one more thing — don't set unrealistic goals for your child thinking you can use that as a «cover» for not really wanting them to have that new phone or a higher data plan.

If it really is unrealistically high and you can show that with convincing data, i'd definitely upvote such an answer.

«Much of the research really didn't have access to or use the highest quality data or analysis.

«It has really surprised us, and this data is important for understanding the energy density of the ring current and the effects on the higher energy particles.»

«We have a half - dozen years of really high - quality glacier data,» West said.

«There are promising data on potential medical use but the data suggesting it dampens the marijuana high are really not compelling when you look at the original sources,» she notes.

But GISTEMP does not really have a better empirical basis in the Arctic, but the effect from the extrapolation (the filling in of values where there is missing data) gives the recent high Arctic temperatures more weight.

So although radiation protection agencies typically restrict occupational exposure (for the nuclear industry, for example) to an average of 20 mSv per year, scientists don't have hard data on which to base high - stake conclusions about what level of radiation, if any, is really safe.

I'm curious, if the mid-holocene event resulted from solar activity, rather than orbital effects, would the resolution of our paleoclimate data really be high enough to determine whether or not these changes were as rapid as the changes we're seeing today?

A good example is if you try and fit a normal distribution to 10 data values using a flat prior for the variance... the final variance estimate you get is higher than anything that any of the standard methods will give you, and is really just nonsense: it's extremely biased, and the resulting predictions of the normal are much too wide.

Microsoft Excel required A new set of data every time the file is opened 7 different topics of data ideal for making line and column graphs Plant growth, Daily temperatures, Pages read, Favourite colours Favourite food, Favourite board game, Favourite footbal team Use the data also, to create your own problem solving questions: highest, lowest, ordering... Project on the whiteboard or photocopy and distribute A versatile and visual resource which the students really enjoy working on

Positive comments from some recent users of this book include: Most schools are full of documents and data... Dr Slater is among the first to show how they can be used to compare what is said on paper and in interviews... The results will shock you... Dr Slater is a successful high school teacher and an award winning author... and here's why... Fantastic little book, punches well above its weight... Makes it seem so simple... the art of the genius... As an advocate of the What Works agenda, I think this book really is a wake - up call... A fantastic insight into the potential for using documents in research... Nails twenty years of research in twenty minutes... Worth every dime... Every student in my class (6th form) has been told to buy this book... and it's easy to see why... Shines a great big light on the power of documents in research... Surely this is the best book in its field... First class... I kept referring to this book in my presentation last week and the audience was ecstatic... Education research, usually has little effect on me... Until now... This book is formidable... Crushes the concept that education research is rubbish... fantastic insight... Blows you away with its power and simplicity... Huge reality check, senior school managers at good schools tell the truth, other's don't, won't or can't, and their students suffer.

A good case can be made for Washington to generate sound data, safeguard civil rights, support research, and assist with the costs of educating high - risk kids — but setting the ground rules for schools and operating the system is really the job of states.

That's something that we really have had to sit up and take notice of and respond to, because that's 12.6 per cent higher than the national data and it continues to be the domain where we have the greatest percentage of children in the vulnerable range.

When summary, or summative decisions are to be made as based on these data, regardless of whether low or high - stakes are attached to the decision, this is where things really go awry.

This is especially important when observational (and value - added) data are to be used for high - stakes accountability systems in that the data yielded via really both measurement systems may be less likely to reflect «true» teaching effectiveness due to «true» bias.

Many authors don't realize just how much book metadata — defined as data about data, or in this case your book — is associated with a single book title, so the likelihood that you're going to omit something is really high unless you're working with someone who knows about book metadata.

«We really tried to identify high - quality, current data resources, but with the internet, you generally get what you pay for.

Are booksellers really pouring over weeks and months of data, comparing sales receipts against sales returns, and arriving upon a list of books that truly reflect higher sales compared against all other books?

There are only 5 tablets really out there worth your time that give you mobile data at high speeds.

We can debate all day on whether or not that price is too high, but what really has people up in arms is the little note under the picture of the XOOM that reads «To activative WiFi functionality on this device, a minimum of 1 month data subscription is required.»

none of the ipad apps has really been a great use bug rather enhancements and play arounds so i see no reduced functionality in reality only less play and less show off, but the potential of the pb is higher on that and i think that if someone is looking for this factor soon they will be more than happy (i dobnot consider it a factor anyway) lastly it is more economical in use because i can use my bb mobile bis or bes service to browse the web (obviously slower than the wifi but does the job) instead of having an extra data plan expence for the no wifi access moments.

Comcast limits data cap overage fees to $ 200 a month (Ars Technica) Even with raises in data caps these are some really high fees.

Consciously or unconsciously, we seem to inevitably massage & cherry - pick the good data & trends, to arrive at a substantially higher intrinsic / fair value that correlates more closely to the story of the company / stock, as we perceive it... and yes, first impressions really do count!

But if you want the really short version, then just know that net positive economic data and easing Brexit - related and political worries, as well as rumors that the E.U. may present a proposal for a transitional deal (perhaps as early as next week), helped the pound to climb higher this week.

Meanwhile, the historical data really doesn't provide much in the way of examples for times when both stock valuations were high while bond yields were simultaneously low.

And if your experience was anything like mine, you'll recall brilliant creative highs punctuated by long tedious slogs sorting through obscure and poorly documented data formats, unless you were really unlucky and reduced to directly hacking binary files themselves.

But GISTEMP does not really have a better empirical basis in the Arctic, but the effect from the extrapolation (the filling in of values where there is missing data) gives the recent high Arctic temperatures more weight.

Should they really be the guardians of data quality and high standards?

Finally, it means you have to be able to measure them really well, and that requires high quality data.

In fact, the deleted and hidden purple data indicates how noisy these proxies really are (in this case tree rings at high elevations and latitudes).

I learned in High School that you can't fix really bad data that way.

Just as many global south cities have never had land line telephony — they've gone straight to mobile phones — I think we'll see cities here that really are able to run on data, use the kind of whole smart city thinking to be very, very efficient, very high quality green design buildings.

What we skeptics want to know is really quite reasonable — how well do the higher sensitivities compare to real world data?

Isaac is super smart and should know better, especially in light of the data showing the high level of warm water entering the Arctic ocean that really wasn't part of most climate models on this scale.

Callendar REALLY cherry - picked his data, leaving out almost all higher values.

A good example is if you try and fit a normal distribution to 10 data values using a flat prior for the variance... the final variance estimate you get is higher than anything that any of the standard methods will give you, and is really just nonsense: it's extremely biased, and the resulting predictions of the normal are much too wide.

If you really want to draw conclusions about an entire data set (ie, from all the stations) from a subset of the stations, then you have to do proper random sampling of many of those stations (the greater the number, the higher the confidence in the result, of course).

I then went to the ECMWF [the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts] and drew down some high - resolution operational analysis data — a cocktail of observations and model data that combine to give a really good picture of the atmosphere.»

, the data within in becomes out of date very quickly, so we would really like to show you how you can dramatically improve the quality of your data to get the highest return on your -LSB-...]

So I think it seems pretty clear that to me, and I haven't seen it disputed, Lexis I think has the largest quantity of data, and I think the highest quality as well, and that was really important to us.

Just imagine how high it really would be if the Property Guys of the world actually had expired data from which the true success rate can be derived.

Yet if the seller accepted the very highest offer, are there really comps and data to support a value that high?