Sentences with phrase «really know the answer to this question»

Despite what anyone believes, from the passionate theist to the passionate athiest, no one really knows the answers to any questions debated here.

Specktor said he didn't really know the answer to the question of whether Zucker was the inspiration for the «Doogie Howser» character, but said he speaks to Bochco almost every day and planned on doing so later that night or early the next morning.

Of course, we still don't really know the answer to that question, but Nick Cowen made a sensible attempt to untangle the complicated web of motivations, from hot weather to unemployment.

I don't really know the answer to this question.

We don't really know the answer to that question at some level.

And if you're like me, you don't really know the answers to the questions above either.

Not exact matches

I asked more and more people for the answer to those questions, and I felt like, gosh, nobody really knows.

And there were a lot of questions I didn't really know the answer to.

The question applies to all of these potential services and the answer really is: who knows?

When a lender is evaluating your business» creditworthiness, they really want to know the answer to three important questions:

Also, make sure your closing question is designed to produce a «Yes» or «No» answer, unlike your earlier questions in the discovery process, where all you really want is more information.

I don't think I can support a party that doesn't really know what it stands for and give me any concrete answers to my questions.

= > did nt answer the question because you know it will expose the inconsistency in your position of «anything that someone wants to do is just fine with Really - O?

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

We might ask in turn how sure the course really was, but as to the first question, I know what answer Neuhaus --- a man who lived every day in the hope of the resurrection --- would have offered.

I was very reluctant to do that because I felt that I really wasn't sure if I would get an answer, or that I wouldn't be ready for an answer, or that I wouldn't know for certain if I felt that I did get an answer that is was actually from God or whether I was just deceiving myself, so for a few years there I just put that off, however those questions and concerns kept boiling up within me, so at that point I couldn't take it anymore putting it off.

I know what I believe, I just don't feel like I have to explain most of it to anyone, since really, love is what it all boils down to, and not the romantic or mushy love... love the verb, love the committment, love the question and the answer, love the embodiment.

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

Though my father had a degree in theology, he knew that having all the right answers wasn't really the point, so when I would pose a particularly personal or challenging question to him, he would often respond with, «You know what, Rachel — I don't know, but I know that God loves you.»

@Russ, I really don't know the author's answer, but it seems reasonable to guess that necessity could answer those questions:

While I haven't read everything on the subject, I know of no other book like it on the market, and it really helped answer some of my own questions and provide me some direction as I seek to follow Jesus by loving and serving others in my community.

Watching him live this double life of public man and poet, one wonders what Astrue — or Juster — is really thinking when he answers the biting questions of a reporter demanding to know why the new commissioner hasn't yet personally fixed the entire Social Security system.

It is really annoying because the answers «yes or no» answers but they have already formulated the answer to their question.

She knew her friend and her husband both believed that, but as she listened to the genuine, painful question — why — she wondered if the answer would be really satisfying.

Jeremy: every time I bring up a question they don't seem to be able to answer, they revert to talking about their experience (vision, dream, inner feeling, etc.) which proved to them the truth of what they believe, and then they tell me that if I really want to know the truth, I should pray for wisdom and ask God to give me a similar experience to reveal the truth to me.

As I have conversed with my Mormon co-workers about their faith, every time I bring up a question they don't seem to be able to answer, they revert to talking about their experience (vision, dream, inner feeling, etc.) which proved to them the truth of what they believe, and then they tell me that if I really want to know the truth, I should pray for wisdom and ask God to give me a similar experience to reveal the truth to me.

Agnosticism is really the best position to hold, because we truly don't know the real answers to any of these questions.

You begin to embrace the questions, you start asking more and more and more... and when you realize that the only answer to some of those questions is «I don't know», you suddenly feel liberated, free of the ego trip that religion is, always saying it knows the answers when, really, it only wishes it did.

I don't know what you expected from us, but I would have answered any question you asked and I really tried to understand your point of view (which was actually my main objective — understanding your view).

It is questions like these that have provoked the simple answer in much of the university today, not only in the United States but in Europe and Asia as well: Drop the idea of a core education altogether, especially when we know that what we really need to be studying is science, technology, and economics.

A lot of platitudes, like «hate the sin but love the sinner» or, I don't know the all the answers, but I'm sure God knows (which when given as a response to logical questions that are challenging theology, isn't really an answer at all).

The hardest question for atheists to answer: You know, I thought about this for a while, and I really can't come up with anything.

The book is called Faith Unraveled: How a Girl Who Knew All the Answers Learned to Ask Questions, and I'm really excited about this release.

If you are a creationist that doesn't want your kid to learn about evolution, please answer these questions becuase I really want to know.

I never really know how to answer this question.

In answer to your question no I don't ever count the calories for anything, I really don't believe in calories.

It's far from rhubarb season yet, so this isn't really an urgent question, but I would like to have an answer for it, so that when they do arrive at the greengrocer's I can know whether I need to buy a kilo or half a kilo...

It was hard to know what all the different options were, as many of the signs were written in Hungarian, but the servers were really patient and willing to answer any of our questions.

This isn't a question I'm going to answer, I really don't know!

Wenger himself is the master of the smoke and mirrors game and will never really give anything like a straight answer to journalists, preferring to opt for the «I'm far smarter than you» approach and just acts mysterious and all - knowing when questioned, OR acts like a petulant genius who gets angry when his wisdom is questioned.

It's really hard to answer these questions as you guys know.

Hard to know the answer to this question, as Wenger hasn't really played him there since he went to a 3 back, and then last week in the 433 pushed him back out wide again.

but if he is really rubbish, Ill settle for Reus and Lemar... but to answer your question, no I did not watch them play Bayern last night.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I know I really didn't answer the question that I posed in the title, but that's what we are going to find out on Sunday.

When you ask questions about your partner's affair, stop for a moment and think, do I really wan to know the answer to this?

There's really no right answer to this question.

This is the point when I've given a basic answer to the question, and it's better to pause and let the child ask for more details about what he really wants to know, than to keep rambling on about what I think he wants to know.

Robin Kaplan: We don't really know what causes SIDS and to be honest, I can't really answer that question.

A kid who knows the facts and has all his questions answered honestly to his age level is going to be much better equipped to live in a world that sends some really confusing messages about our bodies.