There wasn't
really much point in publishing it otherwise.
If you are just going to lie about my position then there isn't
really much point in my attempting to educate you.
There wasn't
really much point going to small specialty shops like Sony unless it was closer and you already knew exactly what you wanted.
If they weren't selling devices here, was there
really much point to maintaining an ebook retail store?
There's just not
really much point in buying reviews.
Not exact matches
«
Really, at this
point, we don't think too
much about Tinder,» he says breezily.
You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this
point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too
much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who
really couldn't afford them.
Great post all
point from # 1 to # 21 are awesome but i like # 1 and # 6 form these Both options work
really very well for better response in online marketing if we will leave comment on another blog post then this option might be gives to us many back links and we know very well how important role of Social Media sites these all sites will give to us
much huge number of traffic for better productivity.
If 90 % of funds underperform anyway, and if market prices reflect all available information and analysis, then are my chances as an individual stock picker
really much worse than Susan's, despite her credentials, connections and resources, or am I stretching the
point?
The
point I want to make is although breaks above the price - related obstacles that are currently being challenged won't give us useful new information, it won't take
much additional strength from here to effect upside breakouts that
really do mean something.
I could say «you
really shouldn't f-ing be insulting someone when your own choice of language appears s — t, doesn't that make you a f-ing hipocrite», or I could (and did) say lady «doth protest too
much», but the
point stands equally strong regardless of my language.
I don't
really have
much more to say though, since I'm not
really interested in rejoining this conversation at this
point.
Again, I am only trying to
point out that this a
much more complicated than most people want to make it, and since none of us are God, we don't
really know.
IOW, your
point is
really, like our atheist friends, that
much of the above is about not being able to prove the assertions religion makes.
Alschuler
points out that the «bad man» whose perspective was decisive for Holmes does not
really care about predicting judicial decisions as
much as he cares about what the law enforcement agencies will do if he tries to get away with a crime.
God has given us
much evidence of His existence: how about the intricacies of how the human body works - can you
really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty of nature - can we
really think that that just happened; what about the testimony of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that
point to things beyond their comprehension or doing.
It is
really not very
much to the
point that two - thirds of those who answer that the Ten Commandments are the source of morality can not name four of the ten.
Most of your assertions are
really out there, so
much so that I don't see any
point in debating it.
My big
point is that my Protestant and skeptical students, who
really don't take
much pride in being Southern, are ready to
really think about (and, of course, contest) that seemingly strange conclusion.
If that is
really true then is there
much point in a Calvinist even telling people to «hope and pray to God»?
That's why our program required 4 years of Greek — there's a
much better chance of getting good enough to
really * stay * good at that
point.
However, as Peter went on to
point out, the meaning of the Psalm
really doesn't change too
much.
However, back to the
point, the quoted material in my original post
really is from the American Atheist website, and I find it disturbing that this disrespectful dialogue (and
much more) is being spread throughout the atheist community.
At this
point, I'm inclined to think that the inconsistency is due to you not
really understanding what it is that you believe (an inevitability, I suppose, when you try not to think about it too
much).
All you have done is prove the
points I made by being judgmental, divisive and a know - it - all who
really doesn't know
much at all about people.
You have posted no facts and every page has the same exact posts pretty
much word for word or the same crap so its
really a none issue at this
point.
Its so
much drama stirred up
really by the atheists and the gays to support their
points and win what they want with the sympathy of the people.
I have been through a lot in my life already and was a Christian attending church at some
point so it
really shows how
much you know about me.
If you
really don't understand that we have multiple theories of gravity and that they all have flaws, then you've pretty
much just proven my
point that you have no idea what you're talking about.
To think that, Hey this does not depend on you nearly as
much as you think it does was actually so freeing and I
really believe at that
point I started to live completely different.
Second, the
point that God did not give the law and that he
really did not require sacrfices is to throw out way too
much scripture.
We have a
much greater understanding of addiction today than we did back then but as you've
pointed out in numerous postings, the church
really doesn't know how to cope when addictive cycles in Christian contexts.
Yet I could have said more that would have been
much to the
point: «If God
really is a Lover, he must delight in having those whom he loves respond to him in love and want to be with him and tell him their love.»
The relevant
point is simply that, in
much the same way as Farrer, he seeks to affirm that God can be
really related to creatures even while denying that God must be so related.
Cos I'm living, breathing, and I see lots of gay and straight ppl all around me I think when ppl
point and pass judgements should
really take a look at themselves in a mirror see why u hate yourself to have so
much hate for others.
My only
point was that doing these activities doesn't
really matter too
much for actually living biblically and looking more like Jesus.
So anyway, I get what you were thinking and I wish people were more open to eating bean burgers because they ARE awesome:) + we also see that they're gentler to digest and pretty
much so
much easier to prepare than meat (not to mention so
much cheaper;)-RRB-
Point is, I'm just
really happy you found this recipe and enjoyed these so
much with your family:)
Anyway, the
point I'm getting to is, while sometimes this level of organization can be indicative of a mental condition, sometimes it can also be
really helpful when your dietary lifestyle requires so
much more cooking and meal planning than most people's.
Also there's
really not
much point to reducing the sugar for this because the less sugar you use, the more you'll have to cook it dow, so
really you're not ending up with a less sweet end result unless you thicken it with some starch, which some people do.
I was incredibly inspired from that
point on and ate and «cooked» exclusively raw for a while, which
really helped me feel
much better.
«We're supplying conventional items in as efficient a manner as we can without
really expanding those lines very
much, but our organics lines are expanding because we see the consumer demand for that reaching a
much higher
point,» Bill Nightingale Jr. says of the company's current focus.
Thank you for adding in the links of these various printers, I have yet to find a place here in Calgary that I
really love and taking a look at these books is a
much better starting
point for explaining exactly what I want.
The
point of that being that the sauce for my orange chicken started with a Panda Express copycat recipe, and I haven't
really done that
much to it.
I also get that frustration of using a botch to advance a story, but if Edwards is cool with how this is being handled, then I
really don't have
much of an issue with it at this
point.
If anyone watched the game you could see that Mourinho set up his team to go for a
point, I think pound for pound City are the only team that
really has the attacking prowess to make Chelsea wary and they didn't
really show
much adventure going forward today, think the red card and the fact they scored first kinda erases that from our memories.
we payed 10 - 12 mill too
much for mustafi, but wenger learnt hard lesson from this, hes dithering cost us, he hates losing money and
points, so this would have
really pissed him off
Team Gutman had yet to
really get going though at that
point and they are
much stronger Team than we saw back in November..
Yes I agree Cech is 15
points better than Szczesny, but is he
really that
much better than Ospina?
But, if you take away from this game that they are
really a top 10 team or that a championship is close, then you are putting far too
much weight into one data
point.
They came together at a specific
point in their personal history, when the money and the All - Star appearances didn't
really matter all that
much anymore.