Sentences with phrase «really much point»

There wasn't really much point in publishing it otherwise.
If you are just going to lie about my position then there isn't really much point in my attempting to educate you.
There wasn't really much point going to small specialty shops like Sony unless it was closer and you already knew exactly what you wanted.
If they weren't selling devices here, was there really much point to maintaining an ebook retail store?
There's just not really much point in buying reviews.

Not exact matches

«Really, at this point, we don't think too much about Tinder,» he says breezily.
You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who really couldn't afford them.
Great post all point from # 1 to # 21 are awesome but i like # 1 and # 6 form these Both options work really very well for better response in online marketing if we will leave comment on another blog post then this option might be gives to us many back links and we know very well how important role of Social Media sites these all sites will give to us much huge number of traffic for better productivity.
If 90 % of funds underperform anyway, and if market prices reflect all available information and analysis, then are my chances as an individual stock picker really much worse than Susan's, despite her credentials, connections and resources, or am I stretching the point?
The point I want to make is although breaks above the price - related obstacles that are currently being challenged won't give us useful new information, it won't take much additional strength from here to effect upside breakouts that really do mean something.
I could say «you really shouldn't f-ing be insulting someone when your own choice of language appears s — t, doesn't that make you a f-ing hipocrite», or I could (and did) say lady «doth protest too much», but the point stands equally strong regardless of my language.
I don't really have much more to say though, since I'm not really interested in rejoining this conversation at this point.
Again, I am only trying to point out that this a much more complicated than most people want to make it, and since none of us are God, we don't really know.
IOW, your point is really, like our atheist friends, that much of the above is about not being able to prove the assertions religion makes.
Alschuler points out that the «bad man» whose perspective was decisive for Holmes does not really care about predicting judicial decisions as much as he cares about what the law enforcement agencies will do if he tries to get away with a crime.
God has given us much evidence of His existence: how about the intricacies of how the human body works - can you really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty of nature - can we really think that that just happened; what about the testimony of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that point to things beyond their comprehension or doing.
It is really not very much to the point that two - thirds of those who answer that the Ten Commandments are the source of morality can not name four of the ten.
Most of your assertions are really out there, so much so that I don't see any point in debating it.
My big point is that my Protestant and skeptical students, who really don't take much pride in being Southern, are ready to really think about (and, of course, contest) that seemingly strange conclusion.
If that is really true then is there much point in a Calvinist even telling people to «hope and pray to God»?
That's why our program required 4 years of Greek — there's a much better chance of getting good enough to really * stay * good at that point.
However, as Peter went on to point out, the meaning of the Psalm really doesn't change too much.
However, back to the point, the quoted material in my original post really is from the American Atheist website, and I find it disturbing that this disrespectful dialogue (and much more) is being spread throughout the atheist community.
At this point, I'm inclined to think that the inconsistency is due to you not really understanding what it is that you believe (an inevitability, I suppose, when you try not to think about it too much).
All you have done is prove the points I made by being judgmental, divisive and a know - it - all who really doesn't know much at all about people.
You have posted no facts and every page has the same exact posts pretty much word for word or the same crap so its really a none issue at this point.
Its so much drama stirred up really by the atheists and the gays to support their points and win what they want with the sympathy of the people.
I have been through a lot in my life already and was a Christian attending church at some point so it really shows how much you know about me.
If you really don't understand that we have multiple theories of gravity and that they all have flaws, then you've pretty much just proven my point that you have no idea what you're talking about.
To think that, Hey this does not depend on you nearly as much as you think it does was actually so freeing and I really believe at that point I started to live completely different.
Second, the point that God did not give the law and that he really did not require sacrfices is to throw out way too much scripture.
We have a much greater understanding of addiction today than we did back then but as you've pointed out in numerous postings, the church really doesn't know how to cope when addictive cycles in Christian contexts.
Yet I could have said more that would have been much to the point: «If God really is a Lover, he must delight in having those whom he loves respond to him in love and want to be with him and tell him their love.»
The relevant point is simply that, in much the same way as Farrer, he seeks to affirm that God can be really related to creatures even while denying that God must be so related.
Cos I'm living, breathing, and I see lots of gay and straight ppl all around me I think when ppl point and pass judgements should really take a look at themselves in a mirror see why u hate yourself to have so much hate for others.
My only point was that doing these activities doesn't really matter too much for actually living biblically and looking more like Jesus.
So anyway, I get what you were thinking and I wish people were more open to eating bean burgers because they ARE awesome:) + we also see that they're gentler to digest and pretty much so much easier to prepare than meat (not to mention so much cheaper;)-RRB- Point is, I'm just really happy you found this recipe and enjoyed these so much with your family:)
Anyway, the point I'm getting to is, while sometimes this level of organization can be indicative of a mental condition, sometimes it can also be really helpful when your dietary lifestyle requires so much more cooking and meal planning than most people's.
Also there's really not much point to reducing the sugar for this because the less sugar you use, the more you'll have to cook it dow, so really you're not ending up with a less sweet end result unless you thicken it with some starch, which some people do.
I was incredibly inspired from that point on and ate and «cooked» exclusively raw for a while, which really helped me feel much better.
«We're supplying conventional items in as efficient a manner as we can without really expanding those lines very much, but our organics lines are expanding because we see the consumer demand for that reaching a much higher point,» Bill Nightingale Jr. says of the company's current focus.
Thank you for adding in the links of these various printers, I have yet to find a place here in Calgary that I really love and taking a look at these books is a much better starting point for explaining exactly what I want.
The point of that being that the sauce for my orange chicken started with a Panda Express copycat recipe, and I haven't really done that much to it.
I also get that frustration of using a botch to advance a story, but if Edwards is cool with how this is being handled, then I really don't have much of an issue with it at this point.
If anyone watched the game you could see that Mourinho set up his team to go for a point, I think pound for pound City are the only team that really has the attacking prowess to make Chelsea wary and they didn't really show much adventure going forward today, think the red card and the fact they scored first kinda erases that from our memories.
we payed 10 - 12 mill too much for mustafi, but wenger learnt hard lesson from this, hes dithering cost us, he hates losing money and points, so this would have really pissed him off
Team Gutman had yet to really get going though at that point and they are much stronger Team than we saw back in November..
Yes I agree Cech is 15 points better than Szczesny, but is he really that much better than Ospina?
But, if you take away from this game that they are really a top 10 team or that a championship is close, then you are putting far too much weight into one data point.
They came together at a specific point in their personal history, when the money and the All - Star appearances didn't really matter all that much anymore.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z