Sentences with phrase «really need any of the investment»

I don't really need any of the investment money, and I could imagine taking a 100 % equities approach.

Not exact matches

To really make the learning stick — and your investment in human capital pay off — you need to make business education part of your culture.

The point is there really is a wide range of choice when it comes to the best retirement investment to suit income need and attitude to risk.

For example, my investment in supply side of cricket protein led to a really great introduction with the consumer package goods company because that entrepreneur knew that I was excited about the space and didn't really need to convince me that this is the future.

It may have been intended to encourage more angel investment by the end of the year, but most of the folks I know who've thought about it agree that, if spurring additional angel and startup investment was the desired impact, the break would really need to be in place permanently, or for a longer period of time.

Unless you really need or especially value the human touch that those services provide, you're probably better off simply choosing low - cost index fund options at a fraction of the bank cost through robo - advisers, which use algorithms to provide automated investment advice, or investment companies (examples of which include Charles Schwab or Vanguard).

If the sector is out of favor, key intuitional players have already made their investments, or you really need the capital, then you will be playing with a weak hand.

So, when you're buying shares of a gas ETF, you're essentially betting that the value of gas will rise from the time of your investment, mainly because people need gas and there's no really solid, widespread replacement for it (nor will there be for the foreseeable future).

However, tilting your allocation towards conservative investments too quickly can expose your financial security to a much larger risk, which is the loss of your purchasing power at the time you really need it.

But if we really want to force regime change from owner, bpoard and manager, as I do, we need our club to finish as low as possible, to damage Kroenkes investment and make a sale of club to an honourable owner more likely, so a Liverpool win is then best.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I think what this part of the state really needs is greater investment in its people.»

«When we get really excited about a field, one of the big, major investments and efforts that everybody has to get behind is getting the data that we need,» he says.

«So in order to assess the value of public investments in biomedical research, we really need to understand the linkages between these investments and private sector output.»

My wedding and dress doesn't really suit a versatile wedge and I need to go with a higher heel (voluminous shorter length dress + My 5 ″ 1 frame means I need to elongate my legs) but the thing I think I'm struggling the most with is making the investment in a pair of white heels I know I won't get much use from after the wedding.

Really frustrating, as it is free!!!!! Training also needs to be embraced by senior management: with schools routinely spending upwards of # 30,000 / $ 47,000 on printing and photocopying each year, training for staff is an invaluable (if inconvenient) investment.

Melissa Benn (pictured), founder of the Local Schools Network campaign group, said: «When will the government ditch this faulty policy and provide public education with what it really needs, including proper investment?»

What's the buy - in from the beginning point of the resources that are needed to building the investment among educators as to why transformative change is really critical?»

But Adamowski and his team never made the investment of resources that were needed to really help the Milner School.

Vijay: [email protected] It was a really good investment as I have a lot of products beyond my books and I needed some special set up.

Better to create a mix of low - cost stock and bond index funds that jibes with your tolerance for risk and allows you to fully participate in the financial markets» long - term gains than to opt for an investment that severely limits your upside in return for providing more protection from periodic setbacks than you really need.

If this money really is for a down payment you'll need in five years or so, most of it should go into a high interest savings account, a guaranteed investment certificate or perhaps a fixed income exchange traded fund.

The investments in MBS only help solvent borrowers on the low end of housing, who don't really need the help.

To make those long term investment returns really matter, you need to know the rules of the game.

In order to really evaluate an investment like this, you need to consider the level of risk implied by the yield, or a risk - adjusted yield.

They almost immediately counter with any number of «better» investment ideas: cryptocurrency, tech startups, angel investing, penny stocks, or a «friend's» really good business that just needs a little capital.

For many years personal investment brokers were touting the benefits of mutual funds because they were a managed investment vehicle in which you literally owned a small piece of a pie along with other members in the fund and you didn't really need to know anything about market movement.

That is one the last page of «Investment Zoo» That book is so underrated and I really think every DIY investor needs to read the book.

It really is a marriage of the best of both worlds in terms of low - cost access to trading with as much or as little investment assistance as you need.

So you really only need to put the money in safe investments that you'll have to tap for living expenses over the next couple of years or so, plus perhaps a bit more to cover unexpected expenses and emergencies.

For example, if you're going to use the Asset Allocation Software to run an investment asset allocation report, College Planning Calculator to show what's needed to send kids to college, Life Insurance Need Analysis to see how much life insurance they really need, and an overall financial plan showing what their financial future / retirement (using RP, or either version of RWR) will look like before and after your brilliant recommendations, you'd use these four modules, combined with the Cash Flow Projector (CNeed Analysis to see how much life insurance they really need, and an overall financial plan showing what their financial future / retirement (using RP, or either version of RWR) will look like before and after your brilliant recommendations, you'd use these four modules, combined with the Cash Flow Projector (Cneed, and an overall financial plan showing what their financial future / retirement (using RP, or either version of RWR) will look like before and after your brilliant recommendations, you'd use these four modules, combined with the Cash Flow Projector (CFP).

If you're the kind of guy or gal who doesn't really need access to someone you can sit down with across from a desk, but you want your investments to be automatically managed, you might think about signing up with a robo - advisor.

The money that you truly need access to at all times and that you really can't afford to put at any risk — say, a cash reserve for emergencies and unexpected expenses, cash to pay a year - to - two's worth of retirement expenses beyond what Social Security and any pensions would cover — would go into the most secure and most liquid investments, by which I mean an FDIC - insured savings account or money - market account and / or a highly secure investments like a money - market fund.

When investors consider Prosper as an investment they need to remember that there have really been two iterations of the company.

A good investment bubble needs three things: a really good plausible growth story with some basis in reality, some real excitement about that growth, and plenty of liquidity.

You really just need a copy of all your tax returns and any supporting documents (W2, 1099, investment documents, etc) that were in his possession.

«Complexity tends to be the default option that gets used to persuade investors to buy unnecessary investment products,» Carlson writes, «while the vast majority of people really just need to understand more conventional options to succeed.»

Of course, this won't necessarily save them from unscrupulous advisers (always happy to churn «em in / out of the highest fee products), so a happy medium is still needed — everybody really should educate themselves enough, or ask for assistance, so that they can assemble and maintain a well diversified portfolio of investment funds / ETFs through a cheap execution brokeOf course, this won't necessarily save them from unscrupulous advisers (always happy to churn «em in / out of the highest fee products), so a happy medium is still needed — everybody really should educate themselves enough, or ask for assistance, so that they can assemble and maintain a well diversified portfolio of investment funds / ETFs through a cheap execution brokeof the highest fee products), so a happy medium is still needed — everybody really should educate themselves enough, or ask for assistance, so that they can assemble and maintain a well diversified portfolio of investment funds / ETFs through a cheap execution brokeof investment funds / ETFs through a cheap execution broker.

So, I think it's important for those with influence to begin to consider departing from the «wisdom» of the past (buy and hold, dollar cost averaging, etc) and to start discussing what we all really need to accomplish our financial goals: investment methodologies which don't depend on emotion, shaky data, «experience» or any other type of non-quantifiable «faith» in the markets.

But if you don't need to access any of that $ 100 investment you made, should the ups and downs in the stock market really affect you?

But you don't see it used much because professionals would have to first figure it all out, then shop for investment database software (there's really only one program that gives good data with all of the asset classes over adequate time frames), then spend ~ $ 1,000 to buy it, then learn how to use it, then actually sit at the computer and do it, work out the bugs, and then update everything when needed.

Really, you don't need to stress every single detail of every single investment you make.

You would need to really think of them as separate things, such that rather than being disappointed that there's no «cross transactions» between files, you think of it as «In my personal account I invested in a new business like any other investment» with a transfer from your personal account to a Stock or other investment account in your company, and «This business received some additional capital» which one handles with a transfer (probably from Equity) to its checking account or the like.

My answer might be more than you really want / need, (it kind of turned into Real Estate Investing 101), but to be fair you're really asking 3 different questions here: your headline asks «how effective are Condo / Hotel developments as investments?»

Since they are really more focused on the investment side of things (that is how they make their money after all), their budgeting and spending features are not quite where I need them to be yet.

While we have a long - term investment horizon of more than five years, we do not often find ourselves needing to sit on large cash balances because this is a rolling process, and when «vintages» mature we are able to swiftly redeploy assets into new investment ideas; thus, we only really need to find four new ideas each year.

Another option is to purchase really good backpacking gear, which is a good investment if you do a lot of backpacking or camping where you need to fly to your destination.

Do we really need to say that our investment is worth the pain of having to endure these practices?

The MMORPG space is a costly investment and you'd need to really burn a lot of money to start competing against the mega-giant, but Mythic VP -LSB-...]