Not exact matches
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt
really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what
really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and
old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding
debts we are owed of
old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
If its
really just all about getting to the Olympic Stadium
debt free, then fair enough at least we know the club's goal's, but how will they feel when we have an Olympic size stadium and a team playing
Old Div 1 style in front of smaller and smaller crowds?
So, okay fine I've got this $ 5,000 joint credit card that they helped me get 10 years ago and their name's still on it, so before I go bankrupt, I'm going to help my parents get that paid down or even paid off which of course means all my other
debts are going to be
really old.
Surprisingly, Americans 65 and
older carry an average of $ 6,351 in credit card
debt, and while that may not seem like a huge amount at first glance, it can
really cost you in the long run.
They often buy these
debts for very little money — often just a few pennies for every dollar, or maybe even less if the
debt is
really old.
The key to this is
really closing the door on the
old debt in some way and then getting back in the credit saddle again so you can start to develop a new and better credit history.
When you look at the reality of
debt negotiation, you'll see that it is
really nothing more than good
old - fashioned haggling.
I do have my current credit report from all 3 credit reporting bureaus, and now I am more confused than ever... I just want to get that
old debt out of the picture, but have no clue of validating how
old the
debt really is.
The Take - Away: The
old debt settlement rules (or lack thereof) meant that companies could charge big fees, and in most cases, not
really accomplish anything on behalf of the consumer.
«saddling 17 - 18 year
olds... with vast amounts of
debt» Student Loans
really, REALLY aren't debt in ANY meaningful
really,
REALLY aren't debt in ANY meaningful
REALLY aren't
debt in ANY meaningful sense.
Our
old friend compound interest
really helps give your
debt payoff plan a kick.