Really the only changes I made to our master bedroom was to take out the knitted throws, and fur pillows.
I think I'd next time I'll dial back both the sugar and the butter just a teensy bit, but that's
really the only change.
I really only changed a couple things on that recipe and now I like these even more!
They will you feel like you've changed your outfit when you have
really only changed the color of the scarf!
Not exact matches
People will validate your ideas and dreams all day, but the
only way they are
really going to happen is if you go out and make a
change.
«Using business as a force for good is not
only a passion of mine but,
really, it's the
only way that we're going to
change the world.»
«We started making
changes two years ago, and it's
really only kicked in in the past six months.»
If there are still open questions, if there are
changes or mid-course corrections that must be made, if there are pricing concerns or additional critical features to be added, there's
really only one person who can make those calls, meaning that the inputs to the decision - maker must be direct and, ideally, face - to - face from the market and the customers.
«To get the full
change to happen, we probably need not
only greater representation of women, but we need to see also a cultural shift in organizations that
really places greater value on gender equity in the workplace, and makes it more legitimate and acceptable for women to lend a helping hand to other women in the work place.»
«These
changes will
only really affect high net worth Canadians who can afford more sophisticated techniques for tax sheltering.»
The
only thing that is
really going to
change in a meaningful enough way to be noticeable is the way Google's new algorithm interprets the way we search.
«In a world that's
changing really quickly, the
only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks.»
For most folks, the
only way you are going to
really change your life, she argues, is if you just quit.
It's not easy to implement in the face of the fierce resistance to
change, which may be the
only thing that many schools are still
really good at.
There are climate -
change deniers, and there climate
change debaters, but there is
really only one CEO who has made doing something decisive about what many scientist argue is an existential threat the collective mission of his companies.
Follow nutrition guidelines for a few years and you'll learn
only one thing is
really certain — recommendations will
change.
JoyRun investor Josh Goldman, a general partner at Norwest Venture Partners, said in a statement, «Food delivery has seen
only minor incremental
changes to the challenging operational issues, and no previous startup had
really changed the unit economics in a sustainable way.
«But
really, the
only way I can
change someone's life would be to live with them for several years.
«Radio is
only just beginning to
change, now that Bluetooth integration is
really working in cars and so on,» Henn said.
«The
only candidate who's talking about confronting this situation head - on,
really changing it, is Marine Le Pen.»
Only if there is a serious attempt, with all countries of the world taking part to fight climate
change, will there be a big enough drop in oil consumption to
really affect price.
If you're the kind of person whose
only financial education has come from the limited curriculum of our public education system, this book can
really change the way you think about finances.
Only thing that
changed is time and the realization that non-Muslim Americans
really need to get to know their conterpart Muslim - Americans.
@God2: let me rephrase that... obviously we have no chance of
changing the others way of thinking, whether he is
really happy with that
only he can know and as much as I wish he would look away from it, I know there is very little chance... fighting with him is futile, so I do what I do best when a person like him becomes obvious... I kill them with kindness and hopefully prove in some small way that all Atheists are not bad.
Only where some question arises about the
change in significance from what might have been expected must the historian
really account for such items.
The problem here may be that we professors are all too accustomed to talking, but talk freely
only because we are confident that no significant
change is
really demanded of us.
Legal
changes would
really only affect the poor who would be unable to secure safe, affordable medical care.
Today, however, her faithful members are asked whether they truly love the Church, accepting the
change even though it appears strange at first, or whether by their secret or public protest they show that they have not
really loved the Church herself, but
only their idea of her.
While external legislation and laws are important, are we not a people who
really believe it is
only the inward
change brought about by the power of the gospel that
really transforms lives and culture for eternity?
Normally in such cases he can
only change with the Church's whole consciousness of its belief, if such a
change really takes place in respect of a more precise discernment of the fundamental moral guiding principles or of certain applications of these to new situations.
So the Supreme Court, when it practices judicial activism, undercuts democratic participation not
only by substituting its own assertoric judgment for democratic deliberation, or by ignoring the plain letter of the constitution in favor of its own political inclinations, but also by understanding itself as a council of philosopher kings (versus
really good lawyers) prudentially adjusting the fundamental nature of American democracy to fit the ever
changing historical horizon that provides the context for its expression.
Seeing some of the «backlash»
really upsets me and
only galvanizes my belief that some people will NEVER
change and are definitely moved by FEAR.
It's
only a matter of time before things will
change because the bible doesn't
really condemn the saved loving gay relationship as people know and understand it today.
But if we can compare a community to a relationship like marriage,
only more complicated, perhaps we can see how expecting our spouse to
change is not
really appropriate to love.
So when people say oh, it's a miracle», it
really means every electron's quantum state in the entire universe is
changed, and it would be gazillions of miracles, UNLESS there
really is
only one electron.
The dominance of the social principle over the political can not be achieved through any rearrangement of existing relations but
only through
really changed relations within and between communities.
Along with this rigorous distinction of primary from secondary qualities there has often gone a belief that
only the primary qualities could be called
really real (their persistence throughout accidental
changes being the criterion of their reality), and that secondary qualities are not part of the real world.
If
change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though
only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the
only significance of which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a
change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can
only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.
Not
only does it appear free from the theoretical incoherence of the older theism, but it also removes what we saw to be the major stumbling - block to modern man's ever
really hearing any witness to the reality of God — namely, the implication that this world of time and
change is ultimately unreal and lacking in significance.
Change really is the
only constant.
If pressed, the persons who use phrases such as those just suggested will insist that the person in question is
really the same person,
only changed.
The priests have once more gained the upper hand; it is
only what the priests do in the sanctuary that
really matters; nothing in the world outside has
changed; people go on getting sick and dying and fighting with drugs and alcohol possession and being shunned for various forms of uncleanness.
It is important to recognize too, that he does not love «some future version of us» as if he «kind of» loves us now, but if we would
only fix A, B, C and
change D, E, and F in our lives, THEN he would
REALLY love us.
We have to look at the root of the problem: ourselves, our selfishness, our pride and our lack of love for ourselves, for each other and for God When it comes to these issues
only God could
really change us.
Do you
really think that the ending of forced prayer is the
only thing that's
changed in schools in the last 40 years??
Amazing Steve... Nice analogy, the
only thing I would
change in your story is that Ted and Jesus didn't
really see the house, but rather they hypothesized the house..
(But again, perhaps 12:33 was
really only addressed to those who heard Him whose hearts were open to a
change of mind, and not to the wicked Pharisees.)
There will always be extremists of religion, people are basically the same as they have ever been, and nothing has
really changed since the don of man,
only our tools.
There was no reason to just through out laws which seemed to provide for a stable, peaceful society so they
only really changed the parts that didn't mesh with the republican form of government they set up (ie references to the crown, privliges for the nobility, etc).
Of course this blog is
really only about underperformance... if they steal your wallet and set your church van on fire on the way out because you fired them for connecting their bank account to your online giving portal, then all of this
changes.