Sentences with phrase «really only fuel»

Of course, the graphics really only fuel the already incredible storyline in the form of brand new cutscenes.

Not exact matches

The only thing that did change was that Iran decided to negotiate more constructively, explain its position better and try to reach a deal by compromising on activities they don't really need (e.g. enriching to 20 % to produce fuel for their isotope reactor).

Indeed, biofuels aren't really a stretch — humans have been using microorganisms to ferment plants into ethanol ever since Stone Age people began making beer around 10,000 B.C. Today's work hinges on engineering a perfect microbe that will eat the entirety of a plant, retain only a little of this food for itself and spew out the rest as a high - energy fuel.

Now how I eat is second nature, and everything about the Body Fuel System makes it not only really healthy, but taste really good also.

The Body Fuel System is a meal plan and guide that not only sets you up with how to eat daily, but also puts essential information into your hands, like how to eat with joy, get - and keep - an amazing physique, know how to eat in any situation, and really UNDERSTAND what your body is saying.

Yes, it can be burned as fuel, but really only as a secondary source, and even then, it must be converted to glucose to be utilized.

Eating for the sake of fueling our bodies so we feel and function well is really the only way to get out of a bad cycle of dieting.

After working with Anne for several months, I feel so much more comfortable around food because she gave me the tools that I needed to determine what my body really wants: what foods feel good, fuel me, and nourish not only my body but also my soul.»

yes i agree... i only use 130 as a generalization... and yes the conditioned individual can mobilize triglycerides out of the muscle at a heart rate over 130, which in the conditioned individual will be used in the mitochondria for fuel... however in the unconditioned individual the triglycerides mobilize but then re-form back in the muscle as fat and so are not used as fuel... science is yet to really explain why this happens... but in my experience the conditioned individual is just more efficient at burning fat... and the unconditioned individual is simply in the process of becoming more efficient... so i recommend the unconditioned individual start with cardio that is less intense below 130... then when they get more conditioned through the resistance training... i will recommend more intense cardio over 130 beats...

Sadly, this really only adds fuel to the fire, as people can feel they can gain notoriety and infamy by being a turd to other players and showcasing their «exploits» to the world.

Although it seems like a big movie nowadays, Braveheart wasn't a particularly big hit at the box office at the time of its release, only really making its money back after the Academy Award for Best Picture fueled its interest in home video.

The thing is, it's more stupid than ever to own a fuel - swilling hauler when you really only have to go to the store.

I had a Mazda 6 as a courtesy car for a couple of weeks, and my only regret was that I didn't purchase that vehicle instead - it was one of the most fun cars I've driven in a while (really good blend of quiet performance and fuel economy between sport and eco modes).

Now if you are really into fuel economy, the Hybrid model uses the same engine, an electric motor and a 16 - kWh lithium - ion battery to improve that number even more — it offers up to 48 km of electric - only driving.

You'd really only buy this model for its 80.7 mpg fuel economy.

Other small annoyances include the bulky, overhand - grip parking brake that likes to run interference for the center armrest, as well as the digital fuel range arrow that can be mistaken for the gas flap indicator — admittedly only an issue for those who don't drive their car much or have really bad memory.

Being very similar iterations of the same base engine, there's not really much to separate them in terms of fuel economy (both versions return 19mpg in the city, irrespective of how many wheels are being driven, and the 400 - hp's 26mpg in all - wheel drive and 27mpg in rear - wheel drive formats are only one miles - per - gallon down on what the 300 - hp unit can muster), so there's very little holding you back if you can stomach the Red Sport's $ 7,000 premium over the lesser six - cylinder model.

The sound system is really nice, too loud for my wife who constantly lowers the volume when we ride together, also fuel efficiency is very good, it gives me around 28 miles per gallon, I've also been very lucky because I bought it with only 11,000 miles and so far it is only up to 43,000 because where I work is really close to my home.

A Spark is really a better more modern car for a lower price, and the 1.4 L turbo Cruze only costs a few k more but is larger and uses more fuel.

Having tens of thousands of drivers converting to diesel for simply commuting back and forth to work will only drive up the cost of the fuel and make life more difficult for the people who really need the stuff.

I'm very disappointed that this, just like the Accord Hybrid and the Highlander Hybrid is just another attempt by the diehard big iron fanatics to use the hybrid drivetrain to squeeze a little more fuel economy out of the only thing they believe should really propel a reasonably performing car — a big V engine.

The only thing that really marks the PHEV out from the non-hybrid V60s is «Plug - In Hybrid» in subtle letters on the trailing edge of the tailgate, small badges at the top back of the front wings and an extra fuel flap on the front wing to plug in to the mains.

** BUY NOW START PAYING AUGUST... NO DEPOSIT **, 8 Speed Sport Automatic Transmission, Demonstrator Plus One Private Owner, BMW Luxury Bodystyling, Chromeline Exterior Trim, 18» Alloy Wheels, M Sport Suspension, Black Dakota Leather Interior, Sports Seats, Electric Seats, Memory Seats, Heated Seats, M Sport Multi Function Leather Steering Wheel, M Sport Leather Gear Shift, BMW Satellite Navigation System, Full Black Panel Display, 6.5 Inch Colour Multimedia Display, Comfort Access System, BMW Reversing Assist Camera With Surround View, PDC Park Distance Control, DIS Drivers Information System, Computer, Cruise Control, Xenon Headlights, LED Daytime Running Lights, LED Rear Lights, High Beam Assist, Automatic Headlights, Automatically Dimming Mirrors, Rain Sensor, Dual Zone Climate Control, Air Conditioning, Sun Protection Glass, Privacy Glass, Stop Start Fuel Economy System, Drive Performance Control, BMW Dynamic Safety System, BMW Driving Assistant, BMW Lane Change Warning Syste ** BUY NOW START PAYING AUGUST... NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED ** This stunning BMW 420i Luxury Coupe is in an as new condition both inside and out and with only 14000 Miles, one owner since being a BMW Demonstrator, and a Full BMW Service History Service History the car really must be the best in it's class currently for sale in the UK.

Those style cues point out that the hybrid system in this car is really more about achieving power, with only a modicum of extra fuel economy.

The KPGC110 GT - R is also the rarest Skyline produced as Nissan only made 197 cars due to the 1970s fuel shortage that hit all types of sportscar really hard in terms of sales and popularity.

Jaguar is really big on making sure you know its chassis use a lot of aluminum to keep it relatively lightweight, which should pay dividends not only in power delivery and fuel consumption, but obviously handling as well.

It's only during intense stop - and - go city driving that hybrids really cut fuel consumption.

The base fare on a really cheap SFO - LHR flight might only be $ 200 once you subtract taxes and fuel surcharges.

You don't have to use them for domestic routes, but as someone who hates fuel surcharges on principle, it's really the only option I entertain when planning my own trips.

Among countries where fuel surcharges are allowed, Japan is probably the only one where fuel surcharges are regulated and really tied to the cost of fuel.

If only that much people (one out of ten) could manage to have a really decent life, yet, with (and historically only once was) «easy» fossil fuel energy source available, is it reasonable to expect that 10 times more people will manage to do so in future without that exceptional source of energy and much less «easy» renewable energy sources?

The results they turned up not only fail to support the «big oil / fossil fuel» funding of folks who disagree with various aspects of the CAGW meme, they show where the money is really going.

I have heard of people eating coal, but providing fossil fuels are only a small part of anyone's diet then there's not really a problem from CO2 exhaled from the human body.

But the Helmholtz team decided to look at the bigger picture: although climate scientists have repeatedly warned that the only safe answer is to reduce — and go on reducing — fossil fuel emissions, and although governments have acknowledged the urgency of the problem, very few really effective steps have been taken.

the 2007 Arctic sea - ice record low was a record low only for a 30 - year period, NOT unusual when looking at the longer record that shows the decline really started in the 1860's, BEFORE widespread fossil fuel use.

But, as he claimed in only a few instances, he discovered the letter - writers were not really concerned private citizens but instead were people working in the PR departments of the fossil fuel industry lobby.

Joule is doing it the only really practical way and that's genetically engineering a comparatively simple prokaryote to excrete fuel in usable form directly from conversion of sunlight, CO2, and water.

This may make sense for all sorts of reasons, and the fact that making the charcoal also provides you with fuel (see Johannes Lehmann's commentary in Nature a few years ago) is obviously a plus, but even a really aggressive campaign along these lines gives ou a negative forcing of only 0.40 W / m ² by 2100.

Currently, the only methods that are really considered ready or near - ready for deployment are forestation, and capture from fossil fuels combined with underground storage.

I agree with you that reducing demand for fossil fuels is the only thing that will really make a lasting difference.

Here's my concern over the specific accusation narrative that skeptics were on the payroll of the fossil fuel industry — as I implied in both my March 17, 2014 blog post and my post just three weeks ago, there really has only been one solitary bit of core evidence keeping this accusation alive the whole time.

Among the biggest advantages of the electric drive train is diversification of the power source, you can then use the electric grid, a very efficient ICE that only runs at a specific RPM and load to run a generator for additional range, a hydrogen or methanol fuel cell, or a Mr. Fusion, it really doesn't matter.

«Nuclear is the only short - to medium - term way to really get away from fossil fuels,» said Peter Raven, president emeritus of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

If we really want to save lives, we not only have to clean up our air, but we have to get people out of their cars, irrespective of their fuel.

Liquid hydrogen is not nearly as common as it is really only used in the space industry as a component of rocket fuel.

Here's the really important part, though: Not only did that time reduction equal more than four days per year for U.S. drivers, the resulting decrease in distances driven and increase in fuel efficiency would lead to a decrease of.79 metric tons — that's over 1700 pounds — in CO2 emissions per driver, or 21 percent less than a driver without a navigation system.

The long - term problem I see with all this is that the only really expandable place for carbon to go as we burn fossil fuels is the bottom of the ocean.

What is needed is for people to wake up and understand that our CO2 emissions through our addiction to fossil fuel burning is really turning up the thermostat of the planet causing a shift that the planet likely only have experienced in rather more cataclysmic events like the big siberian traps vulcanism or asteroide impact.

Its 5.5 - inch 1080p display, combined with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of internal storage make a really nice image, espeically if you consider that the phone is fueled by the Snapdragon 810 SoC, and that it currently costs only $ 299 (permanently discounted recently).