Sentences with phrase «really out of the question»

Since money's so tight, spa treatments are really out of the question.
And since the mean doesn't exist, by definition a variance is really out of the question.
There is absolutely no way I can start over, so thats really out of the question.

Not exact matches

For us because timing isn't really of the essence, it's not because they're nearby right now, the question is how can we help facilitate people getting conversations going and moving offline after you just match, so I think that means some sort of follow up where you can continue to communicate with your matches almost en masse to say, «Hey i'm free this week» or «Hey check out this Instagram photo.»
It really depends on who you are and what you're looking to learn and do in your career, and I think if you think about it that way, you'll figure out the best set of questions to ask.
In it, he asked a very pertinent question: If automation really does kill jobs, why haven't we run out of them already?
It's possible he really doesn't, but that's also a pretty political way out of the question.
Recently on the TED Ideas blog Anthony Tjan, author of Good People: The Only Leadership Decision That Really Matters and CEO of VC firm Cue Ball Group, talks to Julia Fawal and shares his favorite techniques for screening out jerks during job interviews, including these three questions:
The question is if people buy into the idea that (1) smartphones really do harm their ability to take in the world (or, at least, are more «harmful» than «entertaining»), and (2) that they don't have the willpower to keep their noses out of their notifications, and thus need a phone that is designed to preempt most apps altogether.
Yes, No and Maybe are all the answers you can get out of most questions and questions are really just another way of stating the challenges that your company will face.
Don't miss: 4 questions to ask yourself to figure out what you really want in life Warren Buffett describes a pivotal moment when he was 20 years old that changed the course of his career
«Instead of spending months or even years on a hunch that may turn out to be wrong, you're able to answer your questions really quickly — to stop debating in the abstract, and start making progress.»
Family members, authority figures, or executives who want to appear to care about the opinion of another person, but really want their instructions carried out without discussion, often favor tag questions.
To be fair — and this gets a bit into question # 2 (why are the models systematically wrong)-- no one really knows the timing of how this kind of dynamic plays out in the macroeconomy.
As the stock market works out its manic episode of the past few days, let's get into a question of great importance: if wage growth is really accelerating, what will that mean for price growth?
So while asking those run - of - the - mill interview questions can help you weed out the candidates who took the time to do their research (and those who didn't), what you really should be asking are those strange job interview questions that can offer a better glimpse into the person's personality.
My question... is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some more or something different altogether... there is simply so much time ahead of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065 is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front of him, he'll only be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers
The big question for not just Treasuries, but really the US financial markets broadly, is whether global capital will move increasingly to the US dollar out of fear.
She is pointing out a number of questions Zuckerberg has not answered well today — including that he couldn't really name a legitimate Facebook competitor.
If you bring up penetrating theological questions and are challenged about it, you can say that you only did it to try to draw out any wolves in sheep clothing within the congregation and that you really believe every word of the bible.
To even question it will get you into trouble in a lot of circles... Martyn Shenstone and others have written exceptional studies demonstrating the dishonesty of this model... add this to the fact that this all happens where the richest 5 % of the planet are (which you are as well) and it is really out of whack...
Hi, sorry just saw your comment but unfortunately I am either out of concentration or not really understood what your question is... But do agree that all three faiths worship the same God and are all from Abraham.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found out that Lost wasn't really concerned with answering the thousands of questions it had raised — that it was less a heady show about theology and science and more an emotional show about its characters and the human experience?
You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)
You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.
Victor's painstaking analysis shows that the signers of the protocol left the really difficult questions to be worked out later, according to an unrealistic timetable.
The editors could say «Palestine is out of the question,» then spend many issues debating whether it really was, and ways in which it was in the question.
I really feel for those who are struggling with adultery and it seems the reoccuring question is the same.Will God forgive me if i have committed adultery and the answer is yes we all are sinners and we all have sinned no sin is worse than the other to God.If you are feeling bad because for what you have done then it is the holy spirit drawing you to him repent and turn from your sin.God wants all of us to draw near to him to get our hearts right to stop making the same mistakes over and over again.If you feel weak he gives the strength to deal with it rather than trying sort it out on our own.He forgives us because he loves us but we may have to bear the consequence of our sin like David and his family suffered for his choices regarding his affair with bathsheba but God forgave him for his sin.
When we think of him that way, in our most honest moments, we think that while it would have been nice to be back there and hear some of His teaching, see some of His parables, and go ask him that theological question that's always been bothering us — if we're honest with ourselves, we're not sure he's really the kind of guy we would want to hang out with.
The whole «Jesus will make that call... not us»... implies there is some question still as to how that might all shake out for those poor people who it seems to me god has utterly forsaken and forgotten.It seems like we are afraid to say... yah... that really doesn't make sense and I think it's a load of crap.
Basically, Reihan's three favorite modes are outlandish futurism, guarded musing - out - loud, and noncommittal question - posing, none of which can really be called correct or incorrect.
a question of which, as I am now endeavoring to point out, it is really independent.
I always question what's really going in when you bring up a very thoughtful and well - reasoned question concerning status quo and people start running out of the room like they've just discovered a gas leak and the place is about to blow.
«My goal with this book,» he writes, «is to assure people of faith that they do not need to feel anxious, disloyal, unfaithful, dirty, scared, or outcast for engaging these questions of the Bible, interrogating it, not liking some of it, exploring what it really says, and discerning like adult readers what we can learn from it in our own journey of faith... We respect the Bible most when we let it be what it is and learn from it rather than combing out the tangles to make it presentable.»
The most notable recent contribution regarding the issue of Indian - Christian identity is found in the work of Sathianathan Clarke, who, in analysing a particular Dalit community, the Paraiyar, has pointed out just how complex this question really is, when he writes that
«Being someone who can not get Christianity out of my system — I no longer even really want to — it's an intimate thing to question God,» Tillman says.
Deeply do I feel, ever will I protest, for I can appeal to the ample testimony of history to bear me out, that, in questions of right and wrong, there is nothing really strong in the whole world, nothing decisive and operative, but the voice of him, to whom have been committed the keys of the kingdom and the oversight of Christ's flock.
I really wish you would go through and carefully answer my questions, instead of just picking out what you think is the «weak spot» and attacking it — because it's clear when you do this that you have no idea what is or what isn't a «weak spot.».
None of that is in question... however one has to wonder why we consider the current bible canon «the bible» when it was really a collection of letters sifted through and hand picked out of hundreds of accounts from the decades after Christs supposed death.
The officer ordered him to be taken into the barracks and questioned by scourging in order to get the truth out of him as to what he had really done to cause such an outbreak.
Every word that comes out of her mouth is a gem, and every answer to these questions is something I'd really want to hear!
What really makes this book stand out is the wonderful question and answer session provided in the back of the book.
So I make a keto flatbread (paratha) using the Headbanger's Kitchen recipe of coconut flour and psyllium husk powder with a bit of baking powder, the bread comes out really well and is a good enough meal for me with 4 net carbs per piece.My question is it bad to eat this everyday if it fits in my macros.
I still have those lingering questions, but we ran out of time and more importantly, this recipe is actually really, really delicious.
I make a lot of foods that are based off of these products (especially since I don't eat meat so making my own broth is out of the question) and I am really frustrated with all the ingredients in even the gluten free versions.
I was getting all flabbergasted and sweaty because gosh it's so embarrassing when you don't know what they're saying and it brought back horrific memories of when I was still in college and interviewing an international student and when she asked me a question I could not for the life of me understand, even after being repeated six times, to which I eventually just blurted out, «That's a really weird question,» just so we could move on.
However for a player who has no guarantee of fitting into Arsenal's style of play, a player who has only really come to form in one season and a player who will only have a few more years left in his professional career, it raises the question if Wenger should really spend # 20 million on Vardy or splash out # 10/15 million more on one of the world's biggest stars.
This is the kind of article that highlights exactly what is wrong with this club as a whole... so the question you're asking is what option would be less shitty... after the firestorm surrounding Wenger's contract last season, which somehow led to his highly questionable re-upping for 2 more years, things needed to dramatically change or the inevitable same old, same old was bound to occur... as of right now the bare minimum has occurred... we knew about Sead long before Wenger's renewal so that can't be considered a part of the «new world order»... so the only real changes are Lehman coming into the coaching staff, which could be positive but he's always been a Wenger lackey so the jury is still out, and the acquisition of Lacazette, who I really like as a player but I question the reasoning behind his signing
This is 3 defenders out of six and the only time we may have 5 in the field will be depend on the game... where we are defending a slim lead and need to shut out an opponent (mostly that happens about 30 closing minutes in the game... The issue about Man United's LvG trial should not scare anyone from looking at our own strengths and playing through them — We are faster, we are younger, we are more technically adept and maybe we can implement this best... Remember guys a wingback is also a defender when the need arises and the questions we should be asking is if Walcott, Ox, Podolski and Carzola can really learn to track back when played in the wing back roles...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z