Since money's so tight, spa treatments are
really out of the question.
And since the mean doesn't exist, by definition a variance is
really out of the question.
There is absolutely no way I can start over, so thats
really out of the question.
Not exact matches
For us because timing isn't
really of the essence, it's not because they're nearby right now, the
question is how can we help facilitate people getting conversations going and moving offline after you just match, so I think that means some sort
of follow up where you can continue to communicate with your matches almost en masse to say, «Hey i'm free this week» or «Hey check
out this Instagram photo.»
It
really depends on who you are and what you're looking to learn and do in your career, and I think if you think about it that way, you'll figure
out the best set
of questions to ask.
In it, he asked a very pertinent
question: If automation
really does kill jobs, why haven't we run
out of them already?
It's possible he
really doesn't, but that's also a pretty political way
out of the
question.
Recently on the TED Ideas blog Anthony Tjan, author
of Good People: The Only Leadership Decision That
Really Matters and CEO
of VC firm Cue Ball Group, talks to Julia Fawal and shares his favorite techniques for screening
out jerks during job interviews, including these three
questions:
The
question is if people buy into the idea that (1) smartphones
really do harm their ability to take in the world (or, at least, are more «harmful» than «entertaining»), and (2) that they don't have the willpower to keep their noses
out of their notifications, and thus need a phone that is designed to preempt most apps altogether.
Yes, No and Maybe are all the answers you can get
out of most
questions and
questions are
really just another way
of stating the challenges that your company will face.
Don't miss: 4
questions to ask yourself to figure
out what you
really want in life Warren Buffett describes a pivotal moment when he was 20 years old that changed the course
of his career
«Instead
of spending months or even years on a hunch that may turn
out to be wrong, you're able to answer your
questions really quickly — to stop debating in the abstract, and start making progress.»
Family members, authority figures, or executives who want to appear to care about the opinion
of another person, but
really want their instructions carried
out without discussion, often favor tag
questions.
To be fair — and this gets a bit into
question # 2 (why are the models systematically wrong)-- no one
really knows the timing
of how this kind
of dynamic plays
out in the macroeconomy.
As the stock market works
out its manic episode
of the past few days, let's get into a
question of great importance: if wage growth is
really accelerating, what will that mean for price growth?
So while asking those run -
of - the - mill interview
questions can help you weed
out the candidates who took the time to do their research (and those who didn't), what you
really should be asking are those strange job interview
questions that can offer a better glimpse into the person's personality.
My
question... is getting peoples insights into whether to diversify some more or something different altogether... there is simply so much time ahead
of him, its hard to pin down a strategy, even the Vanguard Retirement 2065 is not far enough away to accommodate the time in front
of him, he'll only be 56 by then, but I want to help him and set the strategy
out before I shuffle off the mortal coil so he doesn't
really need to think about pensions etc. as he grows up, comments / suggestions welcome... Cheers
The big
question for not just Treasuries, but
really the US financial markets broadly, is whether global capital will move increasingly to the US dollar
out of fear.
She is pointing
out a number
of questions Zuckerberg has not answered well today — including that he couldn't
really name a legitimate Facebook competitor.
If you bring up penetrating theological
questions and are challenged about it, you can say that you only did it to try to draw
out any wolves in sheep clothing within the congregation and that you
really believe every word
of the bible.
To even
question it will get you into trouble in a lot
of circles... Martyn Shenstone and others have written exceptional studies demonstrating the dishonesty
of this model... add this to the fact that this all happens where the richest 5 %
of the planet are (which you are as well) and it is
really out of whack...
Hi, sorry just saw your comment but unfortunately I am either
out of concentration or not
really understood what your
question is... But do agree that all three faiths worship the same God and are all from Abraham.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found
out that Lost wasn't
really concerned with answering the thousands
of questions it had raised — that it was less a heady show about theology and science and more an emotional show about its characters and the human experience?
You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop
out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you
really believe it and are not trying to duck around a
question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort
of halts discussion from there)
You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop
out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you
really believe it and are not trying to duck around a
question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort
of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.
In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power
of his declaration
of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you
REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing
of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full
of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all
of life's
questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY
out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not
of this world.
Victor's painstaking analysis shows that the signers
of the protocol left the
really difficult
questions to be worked
out later, according to an unrealistic timetable.
The editors could say «Palestine is
out of the
question,» then spend many issues debating whether it
really was, and ways in which it was in the
question.
I
really feel for those who are struggling with adultery and it seems the reoccuring
question is the same.Will God forgive me if i have committed adultery and the answer is yes we all are sinners and we all have sinned no sin is worse than the other to God.If you are feeling bad because for what you have done then it is the holy spirit drawing you to him repent and turn from your sin.God wants all
of us to draw near to him to get our hearts right to stop making the same mistakes over and over again.If you feel weak he gives the strength to deal with it rather than trying sort it
out on our own.He forgives us because he loves us but we may have to bear the consequence
of our sin like David and his family suffered for his choices regarding his affair with bathsheba but God forgave him for his sin.
When we think
of him that way, in our most honest moments, we think that while it would have been nice to be back there and hear some
of His teaching, see some
of His parables, and go ask him that theological
question that's always been bothering us — if we're honest with ourselves, we're not sure he's
really the kind
of guy we would want to hang
out with.
The whole «Jesus will make that call... not us»... implies there is some
question still as to how that might all shake
out for those poor people who it seems to me god has utterly forsaken and forgotten.It seems like we are afraid to say... yah... that
really doesn't make sense and I think it's a load
of crap.
Basically, Reihan's three favorite modes are outlandish futurism, guarded musing -
out - loud, and noncommittal
question - posing, none
of which can
really be called correct or incorrect.
a
question of which, as I am now endeavoring to point
out, it is
really independent.
I always
question what's
really going in when you bring up a very thoughtful and well - reasoned
question concerning status quo and people start running
out of the room like they've just discovered a gas leak and the place is about to blow.
«My goal with this book,» he writes, «is to assure people
of faith that they do not need to feel anxious, disloyal, unfaithful, dirty, scared, or outcast for engaging these
questions of the Bible, interrogating it, not liking some
of it, exploring what it
really says, and discerning like adult readers what we can learn from it in our own journey
of faith... We respect the Bible most when we let it be what it is and learn from it rather than combing
out the tangles to make it presentable.»
The most notable recent contribution regarding the issue
of Indian - Christian identity is found in the work
of Sathianathan Clarke, who, in analysing a particular Dalit community, the Paraiyar, has pointed
out just how complex this
question really is, when he writes that
«Being someone who can not get Christianity
out of my system — I no longer even
really want to — it's an intimate thing to
question God,» Tillman says.
Deeply do I feel, ever will I protest, for I can appeal to the ample testimony
of history to bear me
out, that, in
questions of right and wrong, there is nothing
really strong in the whole world, nothing decisive and operative, but the voice
of him, to whom have been committed the keys
of the kingdom and the oversight
of Christ's flock.
I
really wish you would go through and carefully answer my
questions, instead
of just picking
out what you think is the «weak spot» and attacking it — because it's clear when you do this that you have no idea what is or what isn't a «weak spot.».
None
of that is in
question... however one has to wonder why we consider the current bible canon «the bible» when it was
really a collection
of letters sifted through and hand picked
out of hundreds
of accounts from the decades after Christs supposed death.
The officer ordered him to be taken into the barracks and
questioned by scourging in order to get the truth
out of him as to what he had
really done to cause such an outbreak.
Every word that comes
out of her mouth is a gem, and every answer to these
questions is something I'd
really want to hear!
What
really makes this book stand
out is the wonderful
question and answer session provided in the back
of the book.
So I make a keto flatbread (paratha) using the Headbanger's Kitchen recipe
of coconut flour and psyllium husk powder with a bit
of baking powder, the bread comes
out really well and is a good enough meal for me with 4 net carbs per piece.My
question is it bad to eat this everyday if it fits in my macros.
I still have those lingering
questions, but we ran
out of time and more importantly, this recipe is actually
really,
really delicious.
I make a lot
of foods that are based off
of these products (especially since I don't eat meat so making my own broth is
out of the
question) and I am
really frustrated with all the ingredients in even the gluten free versions.
I was getting all flabbergasted and sweaty because gosh it's so embarrassing when you don't know what they're saying and it brought back horrific memories
of when I was still in college and interviewing an international student and when she asked me a
question I could not for the life
of me understand, even after being repeated six times, to which I eventually just blurted
out, «That's a
really weird
question,» just so we could move on.
However for a player who has no guarantee
of fitting into Arsenal's style
of play, a player who has only
really come to form in one season and a player who will only have a few more years left in his professional career, it raises the
question if Wenger should
really spend # 20 million on Vardy or splash
out # 10/15 million more on one
of the world's biggest stars.
This is the kind
of article that highlights exactly what is wrong with this club as a whole... so the
question you're asking is what option would be less shitty... after the firestorm surrounding Wenger's contract last season, which somehow led to his highly questionable re-upping for 2 more years, things needed to dramatically change or the inevitable same old, same old was bound to occur... as
of right now the bare minimum has occurred... we knew about Sead long before Wenger's renewal so that can't be considered a part
of the «new world order»... so the only real changes are Lehman coming into the coaching staff, which could be positive but he's always been a Wenger lackey so the jury is still
out, and the acquisition
of Lacazette, who I
really like as a player but I
question the reasoning behind his signing
This is 3 defenders
out of six and the only time we may have 5 in the field will be depend on the game... where we are defending a slim lead and need to shut
out an opponent (mostly that happens about 30 closing minutes in the game... The issue about Man United's LvG trial should not scare anyone from looking at our own strengths and playing through them — We are faster, we are younger, we are more technically adept and maybe we can implement this best... Remember guys a wingback is also a defender when the need arises and the
questions we should be asking is if Walcott, Ox, Podolski and Carzola can
really learn to track back when played in the wing back roles...