I never
really saw the dangers, just the glamour of it all.
Not exact matches
It is infinitely comic that at the bottom of the practical wisdom which is so much extolled in the world, at the bottom of all the devilish lot of good counsel and wise
saws and «wait and
see» and «put up with one's fate» and «write in the book of forgetfulness» — that at the bottom of all this, ideally understood, lies complete stupidity as to where the
danger really is and what the
danger really is.
I am
really starting to
see the
danger in allowing your own mindset to «color» how you understand the words of the Biblical authors.
perfect analysis, I actually would like to
see a midfield base of coquelin and arteta when he's fit, I think that would provide us with better protection and allow our attackers more freedom as unlike ramsey, coquelin likes to sit in front of the defence and anticipates
danger quite well (
really impressed with some of his tackles yesterday).
thanks for the sensible comment fatboy yep i know i do get that they do nt
really mean it, but i just cant come to terms with that, i do nt
really expect civilised culture in a sport but generally from the people in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i mean look our world is rotten to the core, the human mindset is terrible when it faces
danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i
see that people even here let the words flow in any kind of way just because the are frustrated, i
really cant come to terms with it, i
really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were
really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i
really think that thats one of the big problems in the world..
There are many things he has done
really well in the last couple of games and throughout this season — that composure, calmness, level - headedness, strong aerially, concentration, winning the ball back and passing to team mates that exudes calm under heavy pressure, anticipating
danger and cutting them out in advance, not giving away possession cheaply that may have cost the team,
seeing good opportunities to quickly release team mates in forward positions from the back line, etc..
The
danger is when you
really rub it in with, «
see I told you if you poured it out it would be all gone.
Other than that, the other biggest
danger of this approach I
see is using it in an environment where the rest of the family isn't
really eating as healthy as they should be.
That's why there are lots of times people think a parent is putting their kid in
danger, when they're
really not: they
see something they don't agree with or that they wouldn't do themselves, and they assume that it must be dangerous, rather than considering that they don't have enough information to make an accurate judgment.
The most compelling dystopian novels aren't
really about a horrifying possible future; they're about the present, and the
dangers we don't
see because they're part of the cultural air we breathe.
Alexander Zoltai presents Games for Writers (or,
really, anyone posted at Notes from An Alien, saying, «With so much press about the
dangers of video games, it's important to
see their benefits — especially for writers...»
And the real
danger (for me at least) is that all my cover designs are pretty good, so if the client chooses one and his team likes it (but recommends some big changes like «make the text bigger and darker and bolder») everybody will be pretty happy — except me, because my
really brilliant work won't get
seen, and the author won't sell as many books (two things that are bad for my business).
In addition to the always present
danger of wildlife you might have never encountered before, there can be some
really fishy stuff going on behind the scenes, stuff that your eyes shouldn't ever
see.
But with efforts like climate engineering (whatever that
really means) I can
see the
danger of expending colossal resources on a solution to one symptom only to find we've wasted our efforts on the wrong problem.
Because we may
see really extreme precipitation events, with very powerful atmospheric rivers, that dump a ton of rain and put us in
danger of devastating floods, we need to continue investing in our flood management infrastructure.
So your so - called «Plan»
really contains nothing but a «target» — which is simply reiterating what others (
see Bill McKibben) have been saying for years, that GHG concentrations are already well into the
danger zone — with NO specific, quantifiable steps to get there.