Sentences with phrase «really see climate change»

You got ta look at least 5 - 10 years to really see climate change.

Not exact matches

I really don't see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic about the issue, but for the mere fact he can't make up his mind whether humans are a cause behind global climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.

When I moved to Arizona I really thought the climate was just one big desert; being in Flagstaff was like being in a different state, the air was cool, crisp and the fall colors were beautiful.Living in the city you rarely see leaves change colors, and living in the suburbs in the desert the leaves...

When I moved to Arizona I really thought the climate was just one big desert; being in Flagstaff was like being in a different state, the air was cool, crisp and the fall colors were beautiful.Living in the city you rarely see leaves change colors, and living in the suburbs in the desert the leaves just stay the same unless they fall off the trees.

I'd really like to see sources to people saying that there is no climate change.

«As the climate goes up, the amount of oxygen will go down, but it's really hard to look in the ocean to see that change,» he said.

«In many of the specifics of the way people view climate change — for instance, seeing it as a moral issue and understanding that climate change is going to hurt people in developing countries and the world's poor the most — we saw really large shifts.»

«Climate change in Alaska means we're going to see more fires and while that's good for moose, it's really bad for caribou,» said Hundertmark, «because it's going to burn lichen beds that can take at least 50 years to recover and reduce viable caribou habitat.»

A new record melt would allow scary satellite images of an even bluer Arctic to coincide with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's next assessment, due in September (though a draft has been leaked — see «What leaked IPCC report really says on climate change «Climate Change's next assessment, due in September (though a draft has been leaked — see «What leaked IPCC report really says on climate change «Change's next assessment, due in September (though a draft has been leaked — see «What leaked IPCC report really says on climate change «climate change «change «-RRB-.

Some people feel that any more than that and we'll really start to see the most threatening impacts of climate change.

With Arctic ice retreating more and more as local summers heat up, exposing ever more cold northern waters to warming sunshine — along with a host of other regional changes — it remains to be seen exactly how sensitive global climate really is.

I don't see how calling it climate change instead of global warming would make people more accepting of what is really happening.

«When I look at the scenarios for future temperature and precipitation, I really see how dramatically our nation's climate could change.»

I also think it has to do with seeing the reactions of the people who take my classes — much like with the folks who take NWEI courses, the class participants get energized when they realize that by making simple changes to their habits and behaviors, they really can do something to help the environment and curb climate change.

The main damage that I see is that it could take money from people who want to really do something about climate change and waste it on «offsets» that are unproven, at best.

Accordingly, let's look at the relative changes in SCC between low and high climate sensitivity to see what it would mean if we really live in a low - sensitivity world.

«And that's a relief, because climate change is really been neglected by his administration for almost six years, and so it's good to see him taking more time and paying more attention.»

See, what it's really about is various atheists and liberals high up in authority, or who have used climate change as a dramatic part of their bizarre religion of everything against traditional religion, except perhaps Buddhism, since it's atheistic, it's their future Noah's Flood prophecy, part of their evolving mythos.

«As the costs of climate change accumulate in the years ahead,» Vertessy said, «I can see that leaders of this climate change denial movement will really be seen as culpable.»

IKEA can see that our customers really care about climate change, but they want easy, affordable solutions.

PDO / AMO CIRCULATIONS If one really looks at the past climate, not just the past 150 years, one will see the climate has changed both up and down in temp.

We see the long - term effect of climate change on society, and it really frightens us.»

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

«Let's see some really meaningful action by the government to address environmental issues created by man - made climate change instead of repeatedly lying to us that they've got it all under control and could do even better if our pensioners, sick and unemployed would stop squeezing the public purse.»

I think 90 % of the public do realise that climate change is a real issue and not some kind of hoax and I also think that 90 % of the public correctly see that the kind of catastrophe implied is seriously removed from a complete wipe - out of humanity, and does not require really serious measures (tripling electricity rates, banning much car use etc.).

What we're seeing is changes in climate patterns that are on the more pessimistic end of what was possible — the ranges that had been discerned or anticipated by our scientists — which means we're really in a race against time.

«Most experts that really study CO2 amounts estimate that we haven't seen that amount of CO2 in our atmosphere in about 3 million years,» said J. Marshall Shepherd, climate change expert and professor at the University of Georgia.

«As an influential blogger on climate change, among other subjects, I'd really like Paul to meet you and chat to you about your views — how you see your role and that more generally the influence of the internet in changing the debate; your views on climate-gate and how that was handled by the media; the failings or otherwise of scientists in communicating the science.»

What Harriet saw as she spoke to other parents and families was how few really understood what climate change meant.

«But accepting that migration is in fact a form of adaptation to climate change, that mobility can be a coping strategy — that's what we really hope to see.»

(Really have to wonder whether Summers, secretly, sees himself in the role of writing copy for anti-science syndrome sufferers» attacks on efforts to act to mitigate catastrophic climate change.)

I really began to care about climate change, for one, when I started to see winters get shorter.

We were also near the end of the oppressive Bush regime, of dealing with a president that really didn't acknowledge climate change — so it was like you could see the light at the end of the tunnel; it was a building moment.

And that's what I saw my role as being, to really communicate why it is that there is such a widespread consensus about human - caused climate change.

I would really like to see crosstables on climate change denial and religious belief, church attendance, evolution denial, and other conspiracy theories.

I was really surprised to see his name on the list, considering he's the guy who runs all the surveys for the AMS to figure out where all its members stand on climate change issues.

DiCaprio was there mainly to promote his new National Geographic disaster - porn documentary Before the Flood in which he tours the world by private jet talking to celebrities who agree with him on climate change — President Obama, Pope Francis, Elon Musk — and also canvassing the opinions of picturesque natives in exotic locations all testifying in a range of languages and accents that, yes, man - made climate change really is the worst thing ever and they can see its effects all around them.

Canadian biologist Dr. Mitchell Taylor, one of the foremost authorities on polar bears, says: «We're seeing an increase in bears that's really unprecedented, and in places where we're seeing a decrease in the population it's from hunting, not from climate change.»

In an era of mounting health threats associated with climate change, Congress needs to see the budget for what it really is: a hatchet job on behalf of Trump's polluter allies.

To this day have we really seen the developent of a large community of environmental scientists with a well - orchestrated climate change impacts research agenda and taking the lead in pushing for it?

I really would not be bothered with climate change had I not seen a tree ring based temperature reconstruction claiming an accuracy of + / - 0.5 degree with a 95 % confidence interval for global past temperature.

Having read both books, seen Donna speak at a previous Westminster meeting and met her at the pub event following the recent Committee on Energy Climate Change session where she gave evidence alongside Richard Lindzen, I would say that our UK MPs really ought to read her books and listen very closely to what she has to say and take her seriously.

Beth Sawin: «Because [climate] issues touch on so many sectors, I see entry points almost everywhere... if your connection is asthma and children's health, then you can ask really hard questions about air pollution levels in your city, because a lot of the solutions to air pollution are also the solutions to climate change.»

See, the first thing to do is do determine what the temperature trend during the recent thermometer period (1850 — 2011) actually is, and what patterns or trends represent «data» in those trends (what the earth's temperature / climate really was during this period), and what represents random «noise» (day - to - day, year - to - random changes in the «weather» that do NOT represent «climate change»), and what represents experimental error in the plots (UHI increases in the temperatures, thermometer loss and loss of USSR data, «metadata» «M» (minus) records getting skipped that inflate winter temperatures, differences in sea records from different measuring techniques, sea records vice land records, extrapolated land records over hundreds of km, surface temperature errors from lousy stations and lousy maintenance of surface records and stations, false and malicious time - of - observation bias changes in the information.)

'' What we are seeing really is just another interglacial phase within our big icehouse climate [and]... the climate has been changing constantly... What we should do is be more aware of the fact that it is changing and that we should be ready to adapt to the change.»

Whereas * SENSIBLE * people can see that climate - change is * REALLY * a vast warmunist conspiracy, right mosomoso?

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

At the local level, we're seeing some really encouraging developments with local governments, such as the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact.

«Once we know how the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere were relating for the same event, then we can start to think about global climate change for these really big climate events that we see,» Ukstins Peate says.

If you want to know how climate change is going to affect us you really need to see what the weather is doing, a leading British climate scientist has told Climate News Nclimate change is going to affect us you really need to see what the weather is doing, a leading British climate scientist has told Climate News Nclimate scientist has told Climate News NClimate News Network.