Sentences with phrase «really see the view»

It was a very cloudy day when we took these pics so you won't be able to really see the view, but I'll try to get more view photos another day.

Not exact matches

«We learned that covering an entire race in virtual reality would be very difficult; however, there were some really compelling shots and experiences that were worthwhile that we thought we could rally around — the pits, the speed shots, and the kinds of views that a normal NASCAR fan would have seen before like this, and for the newly initiated NASCAR fans could show them just how exciting it is to be at a race in person,» Davies says.

«This would really empower them to get the view that they want by being able to fly this robot around with an HD camera and see what they need to see.»

Asked for recommendations, he digs in a briefcase slouched beside his desk, extracts a music player and starts naming recent purchases: Broken Bells, Arcade Fire («really enjoyed that,» he says), Stone Temple Pilots («Good to see them back — and sober») and MIA, a rapper with famously radical political views.

So I view 2016, 2017, and the first part of 2018 as opportunities to really get the pick of the litter per se, and get some of the best names in the portfolio at prices that, I don't think after this year, we're going to see again.

If you really go down the list looking at every word and the heart behind it in light of scripture and in the light of the law of the Spirit of life you'll find major discrepancies and see how carnal, worldly and unbiblical those points of views really are... I'm concerned about the heart behind such views because it isn't one of a disciple (one who emulates their rabbi and is possessed by the «Holy» Spirit of God).

Do you really not see the deep irony of you claiming that scientists base their conclusions on some «world view»?

its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?

It is necessary to adopt a new view of truth, the evolutionary, so that if belief or faith were really historical we would be enabled to see it.

The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.

And, by way of a challenge: Since there is diversity within the movement, I think we could all really benefit from seeing more of it in the form of complementarians calling out the most extreme expressions of that view.

I haven't really seen where Neal thinks the nation should run off his own views but there are some reading challenged commentors on here that don't seem to get that.

The large number of posts at the beginning all gathered together with David's post, provided some really intersting reading, and seeing how the different perspectives were viewing things.

One of these foundations is the view that when we see a table, hear a trumpet, taste sugar, etc., what we really see, hear, or taste are not ordinary objects, but instead our own ideas or images — the colored shape directly apparent to us, the loud blare, the sugary taste.

It seems that in your view, Jesus didn't actually mean what He told the disciples in the Upper Room, for if there is a dark side to God, it was certainly hidden in Jesus during His ministry, which means that when Jesus tells Philip, «If you have seen me, you have seen the Father» what He really meant was «You haven't fully seen the Father, only the loving side.»

There is a diversity of views within NPP but I've yet to see a critique which comes from someone who has really understood Wright's perspective.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

And I take it as established that Hausman has shown a means whereby we can understand Bergson's approach as both metaphorical and rational2 As I am certain the reader does, I have questions I would like answered in light of their important insights and these interpretations of Bergson, but the issue I will examine presently is how Gunter's thesis and Hausman's elaboration might affect our understanding of Bergson's influence on Whitehead.3 The view of Bergson Gunter seeks to supplant is very widely held, and indeed was held, (if not really defended) until recently even by Professor Hausman (see the «Dialogue» below).

I don't even really want to see your children in school next to mine, but since I have no control over that, keep your stone throwing, women hating views in the middle east where they belong.

The anthropomorphized white God has so obstructed Celie's view that she has never really seen the world's beauty and color.

I really think that looking at the entire Bible as a single Cohesive story and coming at it from the idea of seeing how God is revealing a little more of His plan over time is much more appropriate than most traditional views.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Hartshorne intrepidly draws numerous conclusions of this sort, stoutly maintaining that his theory makes for more comprehensive sense than the traditional view that holds that, when one sees an external object, he really sees the object and not just a certain shape in his own brain.

Yep you are right, I moved down here in the state of Mississippi, north of Crystal Springs from Chicago when I was ten years old but still I visit once in a while, now it's twenty years and sad to not much has change, like the parts you said about non-whites discrimatory or rasicts at other non-whites, when I went to school here they treated me as a alien from another galaxy, they pick at my voice cause I didn't had that southern dialog, unlike them I said my words correctly, but not just me, they even hated at others who had better intelect I am not picking at them, It is what I went through all these years, Mississippi and mainly this small town of Crystal Springs see America in a crazy awful view, They don't like difference that even within they own race, ther not that politcal, when some one say God they got there vote, I don't to say much to waste your time, I still remember when I was ten years old I had a constanct back ground check on me to see were I really come from evn though I had the paper saying Chicago Illinois barely no jobs but a church on every street for a town barely under five Thousand, till this very day, they look at me like I am a alien, did you ever had that experiance down here damn my keybroad mess up,

It is of less significance to know how many of such optimistic or resigned «wisdom» sayings were really spoken by Jesus, than to see that the view of man set forth in this proverbial wisdom is in general accepted by Jesus.

You who seek to normalize sin have put yourselves in positions of influence so that we only see a filtered view of what is really going on.

He is the kind who is really blind to anything outside of his own world view, and he sees everyone colored by his own perception.

I would agree with your assessment that the commentators really see things from their point of view only but I have been guilty of that as well.

Attempting to create more non-understanding monsters I see, hopefully «your boys» will grow away from your nonsensical views and adopt an understanding of how life «really works» outside of mom and pop little circus world.

I've only seen the Pacific Ocean once in my life so I was really excited to see the views.

I wasn't really a fan of the long car trips, and sometimes I didn't understand why we had to see «x» site or hike on a certain trail — afterall, didn't every trail have a path with trees and after a long exhausting climb one finally got to see a decent view?

They had really nice things to say about the quality they saw from Orchard View.

Giroud is quality yes but for instance say we bought ibra at 33 yrs now... tell me who would bench the other because i really need to see your point of view... make me understand that he is the forward we need and i will never miss a top quality attacker like aguero again

Seeing the very different views and opinions that have been expressed by many has really taken a bit of the sting out of last night's loss for me.

Well we have all seen the last ten years that AW will NEVER spend ALL of his transfer fund and neither will he buy the players we all know we need so again where the F@ck do you get your arsenal world view from??? The future looks EXACTLY like it has since Silent Stan got on board and your article really cant be taken as anything serious by anyone with eyes in their heads.

because from my own point of view i really don't see what Ospina is doing wrong.

I really don't see any kind of long view here.

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beating

Thanks Geoff Wood, but you see all those Useless people who in charge of the Team will never listen and really understand your point of view, the only way to show our Anger is for all the Fans to Seat at home on March days let the whole Stadium be Empty and no Fans should purchase Season Tickets for next season.

In any combat sport (Boxing being the best example) it is only the really well known fighters that have the ability to draw crowds into an arena and sell pay - per - views that get paid the big bucks which you are beginning to see happen in the UFC as well (Conor being the prime example).

This was another example of a play where you really needed the end zone view slowed down to see exactly how Donald beat Joekel.

i tend to agree with terrys comments yesterday and say that what we really saw was not great team work but a clear view of the pecking order at Arsenal... ball under the arm means its mine everyone else butt out!!

Canopy view panel more on top than towards the rear so you really can't see your child when pushing from behind.

She has become somewhat «mannered» in the past few years (the wags call her «La Scoopenda,» and after last year's Lucrezia Borgia, I could see their point), but really I think they object to anyone who they view as «pandering» to the unwashed masses.

Since she is not psychic, she can't forsee the future, but can really see your character traits,... View Post

So instead of worrying about DeVos, we really should be focusing on: (1) Congressional Republicans, who've already shown great enthusiasm for weakening the nutrition standards for school meals and limiting their accessibility to low - income kids (see my Civil Eats piece, «3 Things You Need to Know About the House School Food Bill «-RRB-; (2) the as - yet - unscheduled confirmation hearing for Agriculture Secretary nominee Sonny Perdue, during which we're likely to get more information on how he views the NSLP; and (3) whoever eventually is appointed Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, the USDA official directly in charge of child nutrition programs.

It's really a simple formula, but, from my point of view it's at the root of everything that we see in kids that we describe as negative behavior.

You just might need to view getting up when you hear him in the bathroom as part of the parenting job for a little while longer (see point # 4), at least until he really understands that no, it's still night time.

I haven't seen many events on campus that really include or shed light on conservative views, so it was nice hearing the other side for once,» Piehler said.

That's a problem, considering that most of us who click on an ad only stay the landing page for a few seconds unless it really grabs us (on that note, I'd be very interested to see the analytics on how many people hit the page, how many start the video, and how long the average «view» is).