Not exact matches
In place of one individual's
interpretation of Christ we have a tradition which shines like a shaft of light through the refracting, expanding prism of a rich and varied religious experience, and by its many - splendored radiance begins to prove how much was contained in the apparently
simple and single, but
really complex and manifold, manifestation of the divine mystery — the revelation of the mystery hid from past ages, the message of God through Jesus Christ, his Son, our Lord.
It is remarkable that this
simple fact of human life fits in so closely with the pattern of the Christian
interpretation of existence — so remarkable that we may be pardoned if we believe that it is not
really accidental at all, but providential.
Did they
really have to be so clumsy, so stupid, so
simple, that they could not present a coherent account or clear
interpretation, but left things so muddled and ambiguous?