Sentences with phrase «really studied the data»

This is the type of comments (because it doesn't qualify as article where someone really studied the data) after a game where the team did not gave out all to win.

Not exact matches

I think the point is you have to look at a number of studies that compile the data in different ways to see what is really going on.

Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a number of unrelated data, nonetheless seriously really worth taking a search, whoa did one particular study about Mid East has got far more problerms too 手機保護殼 http://www.yoyoshiu.com

While there are sufficient studies and data on the immunity benefits of breastfeeding on babies, there aren't really any studies that show a direct link or benefit to a mother's immune system.

«The key,» argues Dr. Mall, «is to look critically at the data, as the study may not really be able to say what the authors are suggesting it does.

The data on effect of breastfeeding during gluten introduction were actually incomplete in this study, and the authors recognize that and don't really emphasize these findings.

We really need an objective study to determine this — we need data.

After sifting through the studies» data, researchers arrived at an answer that will please pro-juicers: Not really.

«Our collaboration with Virginia Tech really allowed us to see how data in the wild was performing and how the current microservices were working to achieve tasks of retrieving and posting data,» said Mohamed Mohamed, collaborator on the study and member of IBM's container storage research group, Ubiquity.

«The study gives us a really good handle on how to approximate how much ice Greenland is going to lose in the coming century,» says Ted Scambos of the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.

However, data from that region are really sparse for the studied period, he said.

«The data are really good to know,» says microbiologist Ralf Möller of the German Aerospace Center in Cologne, who ran one of the studies of SAFR - 032 exposed to space outside of the ISS.

For their study, published Nov. 8, 2016, in Environmental Research Letters, the researchers first analyzed vegetation cover data for the months leading up to the storm to see if the Syrian conflict had really changed the land cover that much.

Last year Ohio State University geophysicist Michael Bevis and his team were studying Global Positioning System (GPS) data from a reservoir lake in Chile when they spotted something «really strange»: an oscillation of the lake bed.

Inclusive fitness «really changed the kind of data that field biologists who are interested in social traits were collecting,» says his colleague Joan Strassmann, who studies how inclusive fitness governs the behavior of slime molds.

Scientists have known about the beneficial effects of bone marrow transplants since the late 1960s, but «there really hasn't been much data available to explain what is going on,» says immunologist James George of the University of Alabama, Birmingham, an author of the new study.

We want to connect them all because, really, we'll not be able to find the root cause of cancers and the best treatments for those cancers without studying, literally, data from millions of patients,» says Dishman.

«The Argo data is really critical,» said Paul Durack, a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher who led the new study, which was published in Climate Nature Change.

«I really worry about this study — I think it's flawed,» says Peter Snyder, a neurologist who studies ageing at Brown University's Alpert Medical School in Providence, R.I. Snyder agrees that data supporting the efficacy of brain training are sparse.

«People are getting all this information on their sleep patterns and not really knowing how to interpret it, or even if it's legitimate data,» says study lead investigator, Rebecca Robbins, PhD, a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Population Health at NYU Langone Health.

Dr Anna Scaife, Head of the Interferometry Centre of Excellence at The University of Manchester and one of the study's authors, said: «From sitting in a converted train carriage in the frozen north of Finnish Lapland repurposing the KAIRA telescope to crunching data through IONONEST, we have used the technology in new and innovative ways that can really push this science forward.

While Ritz calls the new study «interesting» and «really necessary,» he also emphasizes that the new data correlate vision with magnetic - field sensing rather than absolutely defining the neural pathway.

«I would argue that [more than] 10,000 data points really tell a better story,» says hydrogeologist Donald Siegel of Syracuse University in New York, whose team published the new study online this month in Environmental Science & Technology.

«When each of the clinicians or clinical teams that have been using ZMapp release their data, we'll get a better sense of maybe the efficacy, but even then, it's hard because it's not really a designed study,» Kobinger said.

You know, those studies have really not been our focus of funding, and so we're paying a little bit, you know, the price now of not having some of the just very basic, what seemed to be simple data that we'd like to have.

«Maybe this [study] will reignite some of the interest in the corridor region, and help people who have other types of expertise or are collecting other types of data to really start focusing on this area again.»

Most studies on gun violence «are really done on a shoe string and with easily available data,» and «we don't have a reporting system that is as standardized or reliable as it should be,» said Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research in Baltimore, Maryland.

«These are early data, but they tell us we are on to something really important,» said Antoni Ribas, M.D., Ph.D., of UCLA (left), who is principal investigator for the study and also a member of CRI's clinical trials network.

«Samples collected in the field are precious, and the data that they generate is really valuable to the researchers who are leading their own scientific study.

There are a number of flaws in the study, and we are limited in what we can really interpret from it, but overall it paints the same basic picture as the rest of the data discussed above.

All you can really do with data from an observational study is form a hypothesis, which must then be tested in randomized, controlled trials, to ferret out the truth about whether or not x actually causes y.

In my China Study critique last year, I pulled a bunch of data directly from «Diet, Life - style, and Mortality in China» — the same book Campbell and Chen are huddled around in that last picture — showing just how inconsistent the «plant - based diet is healthier» message really is.

Several recent review studies that combined data from multiple other studies, found that there really is no link between saturated fat consumption and heart disease.

What they are really saying is this: «While we have no human data, animal studies suggest that for adult reproductive functions a daily ingestion of about 2 teaspoons of borax is safe.

A whole - school approach Valuable and interesting as such studies are the reality is that we don't really need data to tell us these key points.

I don't have enough data points to study it, but I have a feeling the concept is really similar to what you are talking about with stocks.

Rob Bennett believes that by studying the historical return data we can advance our understanding of how stock investing really works.

Something to note though, that studies also shift based on new historical data that is generated over time (it's all a moving target, really).

But some interesting data from Dr. Emily Weiss at the ASPCA highlights that pit bulls are really very highly adoptable dogs (they are actually the third most adopted breed from the shelters she studied) but that other issues, including breed - specific housing issues, are leading to many of their challenges.

The first - of - its - kind study mixed brain - imaging data from canines with a series of behavioral experiments, and came to the conclusion that dogs really do value the relationships they have with their owners.

b) Chris Mooney's book mentions the Data Quality Act and what it was really for (i.e., hold up inconvenient research results, and ideally keep demanding further study and wasting time so that the inconvenient research slows to a halt.)

Numerous case studies have revealed that no - till farming greatly reduces erosion.To determine if there really was a link between no - till farming and the prevention of soil loss on a large scale, Montgomery gathered a wealth of erosion data from all over the world and compared no - till erosion losses to those from plow - based farms.

This is really bad news because it seems to suggest that our data of the 19th century has not got enough precision to be used in climate studies.

Craig, I really have no desire to respond to you, but everyone who studies this subject knows the data is wrong (anyone can look at the instrumental record and see this trivially).

A paper reporting a «rigorous double blind» study — the VIGOR trial — was submitted to NEJM in 1998, got through peer review at one of the most up - tight journals in the world of medicine, and — by way of cherry - picking the data submitted (selecting out some study subjects whose adverse events histories which, if considered, would've significantly affected the safety profile for rofecoxib and revealed something that Merck really didn't want us prescribers to learn about their «blockbuster» product — was published to be touted by Merck's marketing weevils as solid proofs of Vioxx's tolerability, efficacy, and safety.

There is «fair dealing» in database rights to the extent that anyone has a right to extract & reuse an insubstantial portion of the database (not really defined in law but it's very small) for any purpose, or where the portion is substantial, extract and use data for non-commercial research or private study.

«When it comes to really demonstrating the impact of organic operations,» says Batcha, the hotspot study provides a rare form of quantifiable data in an arena where anecdotes have long been common.

Is this where we should really be putting most of our resources and focus, given the many layers of uncertainty, complexity, convolution, feedback dynamics and relative youth of climate studies as a discipline (not even 50 years worth of satellite data)?

The new study [Samanta, and by implication Saleska since the observations agree] contributes to our understanding of interpretations of data retrieved from satellites, but it does not prove or disprove anything about what is really happening on the ground.

«This study makes the important point that we need to look really carefully at data quality and issues of instrument change,» said Piers Forster, professor of climate change at the University of Leeds, UK.»