Sentences with phrase «really think of any other»

That may be why people are so rarely honest about what they really think of others.

Hockey is their job, and I can't really think of any other job (besides other sports) that not only rewards it's workers for doing poorly, but gives out the best «bonus» to the worst performer.

Not exact matches

And never follow your apology with a disclaimer like «But I was really mad, because...» or «But I did think you were...» or any statement that in any way places even the smallest amount of blame back on the other person.

Because as Scaramucci advises in the Big Think video: «I think you can really see people's intentions by the way they talk to other people and their level of civility.&rThink video: «I think you can really see people's intentions by the way they talk to other people and their level of civility.&rthink you can really see people's intentions by the way they talk to other people and their level of civility.»

«There have been times when I've had a really busy week and a lot has been going on and I'll sit down on the cushion and then I'll just start crying and I'll realize that I'm so sad about this one thing, but I had no space to grieve, no space to think about it; I was zipping from one thing to the other all week,» says Pennell, who has studied at Insight Meditation Society, one of the top meditation centers in the country.

She really didn't think in gendered terms, she says; she was «more concerned about being the daughter of the founder and therefore needing to perform better than others so as not to give the impression of nepotism.»

«You know I think the way we deal with the tax bill is by being honest about it, saying across time the very significant tax reductions for groups and parts of our economy that really weren't needed will hurt the fiscal condition of the country and put us in a bad position as it relates to other priorities we have,» Delaney said.

In other words, if you really want to ensure a collaborative environment, you need to think about putting incentives in place that reward team outcomes — instead of just individual performance.

We really need to be colorblind and without borders and think of others and how we can make a difference for them.»

Breaking open your business and thinking about each different component of value and whether it can be interfaced with and offered to other parties is a really interesting model for agility moving forward.

You didn't have drum machines, you didn't have anything — the only other person I can think of that was really capable of doing that was Stevie Wonder.»

Problem No. 2: On the other hand, CSR is unfairly burdensome, if really taken to heart — that is, if you really think that the pursuit of social contribution ought to take over a manager's entire way of thinking.

The other main takeaway might just be that what we think of as the problem is really the solution.

Never follow an apology with a disclaimer like «But I was really mad, because...» or «But I did think you were...» or any statement that in any way places even the smallest amount of blame back on the other person.

I think it is incumbent upon alphabet and the other platforms to really engage with their users and explain to them how their business model works and provide a level of transparency to the users so that they understand how the data is being used.

In other words, those happen because those are natural firsts, those happen naturally because of evolution but can you create those kind of important moments in your life and it really comes down to creating doing new things, always creating — you have to be a little more creative when you get older to create those new things but those are the things you think about which I think are quite important.

There are lots of people who think that if they set up their cryptocurrency addresses as anonymous, and while it may be more anonymous with some cryptocurrencies than with others, is there really any such thing as true anonymity online these days?

But when you get to call them stocks and you get stock quotes daily on these pieces of paper that bounce around put people put numbers on it and volatility and all these other things where really it's not that meaningful, you know from one sense if you're investing in businesses and you did a lot of research and invested in eight different businesses with the proceeds of your sale, people would think you're a pretty prudent guy.

It was a really forward thinking decision at the time - one that other governments didn't follow - as the number of Canadians receiving retirement benefits from the government will more than double between 2003 and 2030.

But what did we really think would happen when the worst aspects of Silicon Valley, a cynical Etonian establishment, reactionary Anglo - American nationalism and hedge - fund capital found each other?

Ezra Klein: There is a quality of being able to say no and being able to shop around and being able to do things on your timetable that really matters here, but the other thing that I think is interesting there, because here's where I think possibly liberals can take this argument too far.

High deductible plans, and then the other one I really liked, which I don't think will ever see the light of day, is the Cadillac tax.

I was thinking this the other day, when a lot of the Facebook executives get on Twitter and feel victim - y, they're doing their victim - y dance right now a lot of the time, and at one point, Boz, Bosworth, when he said, «Maybe people will die,» that memo, and instead of being like, «Oh god, we really have to be more mature about this,» their thing was, «We can't talk now.»

Palmer noted that the smart - contracting capabilities of Ethereum aren't really being used for anything other than ICOs right now, and he «thinks that's really telling».

I thought I'd start up the MBA Monday series again (NPV, Accounting, Investing and all sorts of other goodies) to bring you a really cool calculation you can do in excel that you may not have heard of.

Mr. Anglin has a habit of saying what he thinks — which, despite the claims of the Wildrose Party and other right - wing Western Canadian political groups that's how elected officials should act, doesn't really go over that well in the real world of politics.

I think that all of the Bitcoin users and developers need to sit down, think this through and get a decision done about this matter as fast as possible before the community really starts moving their trust to the other alternate coins that have already solved this issue.

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!

With the bogus creator and other people behind the software, it is really hard to think of this software as anything else than a scam.

Is the market currently being driven by the «90 % employed» segment of the population who thinks the other 10 % doesn't really matter to the economy's bottom line?

It is true that people often believe things for bad reasons — self - deception, wishful thinking, and a wide variety of other cognitive biases really do cloud our thinking — but bad reasons only tend to work when they are unrecognized.

But in the real world, I think atheists and people of varying faiths probably work together on various things for the good of mankind — often not really knowing fully about each others» beliefs, yet still accomplishing good things together.

Yes our quality of life is still quite good relative to SOME other countries... that not really what people are thinking though when they use the term «3rd world country» — they are talking about the trending that they see — and the media reflects a perception out there that things are trending in a negative direction... look, if you read my original posts, you will see that they have much less to do with our economy as they have to do with WHY we are involved in the middle east and the SOCIAL impact of that.

Ideally I would think it would be really nice for you, me and many of the other commenters of all views could just sit in a coffee shop and casually talk about our ideas on the subject.

You really love the idea of other people burning for eternity because they don't think like you.

Authorship of John — many if not most NT scholars believe that John nor one of 12 wrote John; James — most agree not authored by James, and sometime in 2nd century AD; Peter — a mystery — some think that it could have been an early template for the other gospels; Luke — a mystery; Mark — finally it seems like we really might have another original author here — or were he and later Paul just using a very early Peter story?

Of course the theologian knows he was a Jew but do you really think with all that is going on in this world Jesus gives a hoot what Chritiains eat as long as we find a way to feed each other.

I think he, and others like him, are really not convinced in what they believe, and come here for either conversion to Jesus or vindication of their birthing beliefs.

I think it is really wonderful that the conservatives of this country keep liberalizing their opinions on what other ethnic groups are acceptable.

It's not quite right to think of we Americans as questing after fugitive moments of happiness; really, we're questing after fleeting respites from happiness, too, just as we're oscillating constantly in our strivings for individuality on the one hand and a relief from individuality on the other.

Fear mongering is a large part of religion unfortunately and until society learns to think for themselves and tell others that the only opinion that really matters is their own, we will continue to see the effects of that fear.

I agree with the others who think it's an excellent marketing strategy, regardless of what she really believes.

Live that way if you really think it's going to help «save» yourself, but do not confuse your foolishness with the fact that others do NOT need your idea of salvation... and just might actually lead a richer life than the one yours.

Yes, hawaii, and I think quite often they do not realize how ridiculous they sound when one (versus the other) will disenfranchise an entire group of people, yet both will say that particular issue is not really a disagreement because it's not a «central» tenet of Christianity.

@God2: let me rephrase that... obviously we have no chance of changing the others way of thinking, whether he is really happy with that only he can know and as much as I wish he would look away from it, I know there is very little chance... fighting with him is futile, so I do what I do best when a person like him becomes obvious... I kill them with kindness and hopefully prove in some small way that all Atheists are not bad.

We would be working hard on the music and things would be going really well, and we originally thought that meant we were obviously taking care of each other because we were working together all the time.»

I'm sick of defending my faith after the fact to nonbelievers that means I'm not pro-active in my faith.It really irritates me how Christians get so offended at these groups and decide, through their pious thinking, that the best thing to do is create an alternative to these days and other ideas.

If you really think that you're honoring your god with that sort of tactic, then you two deserve each other.

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.