Sentences with phrase «really understood the point»

I don't really understand the point of a National Prayer Day, but I also don't get why it is seen as such a negative thing by people who don't want to participate.

Thanks Geoff Wood, but you see all those Useless people who in charge of the Team will never listen and really understand your point of view, the only way to show our Anger is for all the Fans to Seat at home on March days let the whole Stadium be Empty and no Fans should purchase Season Tickets for next season.

I don't really understand the point of this comment.

You can talk about how students need to type in proper case and not use IM shorthand, but when their collaborative partner from Germany says they're struggling to understand what's being typed in your classroom, your students really understand this point.

Brill's three page rant about Diane Ravitch reveals that he didn't really understand the point of «The Death and Life of The Great American School System.»

... I don't really understand the point of replacing the coolant.

never really understood the point of these concept cars, a stupid waste of money on their behalf really...

I don't really understand the point of «friending», as I don't see myself playing onine or using the Miiverse, but what the heck: manukajoe

Not exact matches

I can understand why there might be questions about something new that's different, but we've really tried to do it from the point of view of the publishers, and we believe that we can create an environments that's actually really great for the publishers, really great for the readers, and also really great for the advertisers.

«The No. 1 job in America, the point of person, is someone who doesn't understand the people, and really don't give a f — about the people,» James said.

But his point is critical to understanding why Griffith's unconventional way of running a business isn't really that unconventional at all.

My understanding at this point is that there's almost an 18 % reduction in the county population, which is really good news.

Hearing people out, and really listening to what they are saying, is the best way to understand their point of view.

«You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view,» he says.

Channel this passion to really understand why the pain point exists and what it's preventing users from achieving.

But if you can find some common ground with your prospect and show that you really understand their pain points, people will respond.

It takes a lot of education and effort to make people understand how Bitcoin and Blockchain works so we are really glad to have been able to reach this point in only a couple of years.

I think we're still at the point right now where businesses might hear «employee advocacy» and not really understand what it means.

People do goofy things on all sorts of things so I don't really understand what your point is.

It really does reinforce my previous point, you can't get past the general understanding because of this ADD you guys have.

In fact, however you study human beings in biology, whilst you will find out true and important things, you will never really understand what it is to be human — you will miss the point.

Peter seems to bounce from one verbal extreme to the other — at one point saying more about Jesus than he really understands, later denying that he even knows him.

My point was, if you really understand Atheism, then NOTHING should offend you because it is NOTHING to you.

Nobody but God understands what it is like for me to write my dissertation, and that is really the point.

This brings me to a third related point, I'm not sure, apart from really understanding the importance of Aslan, as Lewis knew Him and loved him, that it is possible for a film company to get Lewis right.

I'm not sure what my point is really, I'm kind of rambling, but I suppose it's just that I'm wondering that if it's possible for a bunch of online strangers to work out their disagreements and come to a friendly understanding (and yes endure temporary offenses and misunderstandings), it must be possible in real life church IF (a big «if») we are willing to stop being too afraid to speak up.

This reply here is just what you wanted, not exactly as you wanted it, but really, it's all there... blast away... and understand that it's right... and God is there... and you reject no matter what is told to you... at any point in time, past, present or future... so it makes no difference who said it, or when you're told.

But because of violations of God's intentions among the oppressor, love must include the dimension of divine wrath.8 At this point, Cone really began to push the limits of understanding:

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

The point at which communication frequently breaks down is not in the speaking or the listening, per se, but in failing to check frequently to see if one really hears and understands what the other means, feels, and intends.

At this point, I'm inclined to think that the inconsistency is due to you not really understanding what it is that you believe (an inevitability, I suppose, when you try not to think about it too much).

I don't know what you expected from us, but I would have answered any question you asked and I really tried to understand your point of view (which was actually my main objective — understanding your view).

This only happens occasionally in the book but prevents the reader sharing in the deeper revelation and love of God that is occurring at that point in salvation history, especially in light of the New Testament, and raises the question that if the person in Scripture who is experiencing this unique relationship with God didn't really understand God, then how can we?

Can we really assert that the noble activity of marital intimacy which indeed manifests and promotes the unity of the couple (thereby «making love») is imperfect when a couple has recourse to it in a manner consistent with their understanding that God's will is that they are not being called to have (more) children at a given point?

When I really decided to get down to the nitty gritty and examine my beliefs, stuff that atheists had said on boards like this finally got through and I began to see the logic and understanding behind their points.

If you really don't understand that we have multiple theories of gravity and that they all have flaws, then you've pretty much just proven my point that you have no idea what you're talking about.

His first point is to argue that phyletic gradualism — understood in the sense that evolution proceeds at a single uniform rate of speed, called «constant speedism» by Dawkins — is a «caricature of Darwinism» [46] and «does not really exist.»

I wouldn't expect you to be able to understand judaism from an outsiders point of view, the same way I will never understand christianity for the same reason, just know Chad that trying to explain my own religion to me through the lens of yours doesn't really make sense and just seems foolish.

I really understand this woman's point of view and wholly agree with her.

Conway Morris points out that we don't actually know what life is at all; although we can study and describe it in detail, we don't really understand how it coheres.

You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view -LSB-...] until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.»

We have a much greater understanding of addiction today than we did back then but as you've pointed out in numerous postings, the church really doesn't know how to cope when addictive cycles in Christian contexts.

I gradually got to the point where I wasn't sure whether other people really «understood» the Christian life the way I understood it, and I was quick to criticize people who were «doing it wrong.»

@AnViL, Do you really not understand the legal distinction or are you trying to make some sort of point?

As to your second point, I understand the media has portrayed the situation to cast the Church in a bad light but it really only demonstrates that the EU along with the media have an anti Catholic bias.

While I certainly understand and respect your faith, I just want to point out that whether one looks at what «gets destroyed» or what «does not» get destroyed has really no relevance or bearing on the subject of whether or not there is a God.

Hi, I'm really like the recipes, but there is one point I don't understand, is it the point 5.

I decided it couldn't really go too terribly wrong (I may have tasted the batter at this point, in the interest of science you understand) and so tossed it in the oven.

I can understand how more sensitive souls could see it as one big, harsh, body - image - trashing slur, but if you can take it lightheartedly, it's really a great read, full of important points and good ideas.

I think it is a shame because I really believe my girls have gotten great things from their time in the Girl Scouts, at the same time I do understand their point of view.