Sentences with phrase «really up to the government»

«If the courts are going to rule in the family's favour then it is really up to the government to find a solution,» says West.

Not exact matches

As an avowed supporter of open data — or the government freeing the information it gathers to the public — I really wondered how Kundra felt about the issue, especially given that he's now on an advisory panel set up by Tony Clement.

«The markets at the moment really want to see a rate hike by the central bank, as a sign that it is still a credible institution; that it's taking its inflation targeting somewhat seriously and that it is prepared to stand up to government pressure,» Capital Economics senior emerging markets economist William Jackson said.

Finally, there is the question whether the price increases that cable companies will end up paying will really amount to «hundreds of millions of dollars,» as the government alleges, and how much of that will be passed on to consumers.

«I think it's really time for provincial and federal governments to wake up and see that that kind of tension within the population is rising again.»

If the government really wants to help the American economy it would set up an insurance fund for states and municipalities, with regulatory power to insist on adequate financing rather than borrowing.

If the government in turn decides to reduce its spending or increase taxes to make up for the budget shortfall, then helicopter money isn't really helicopter money.

Detractors of paper money have always been fixated by the absence of gold to back it up, but they fail to recognize what really makes a currency accepted and secure — the government guarantee and the good sense of the sovereign not to abuse its franchise.

«The Canadian government really has no choice but to stand up for Canadian industries on this.»

I honestly think the Roth IRA isn't all it's cracked up to be and is really just something created by the debt laden government to get more taxable income.

This is why we have governments but its up to people which type of government they want, the world's governments or Gods Way, simple really.

A dollar of government spending supplants up to 50 cents in private donations, notes Arthur Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, in Who Really Cares.

I really hope that the GOP catches up on domestic issues and realizes that religion needs to stay out of politics, because I and many others believe that Small government where the majority of power is left to the states is the superior form of government, and there is nothing wrong with that.

There was no reason to just through out laws which seemed to provide for a stable, peaceful society so they only really changed the parts that didn't mesh with the republican form of government they set up (ie references to the crown, privliges for the nobility, etc).

What they wanted was somebody to show them what to do and to help them, and not having that help is costing the Government and the devolved Administrations through the outcomes for those babies, as they are more likely to cost the NHS more in later life; through the outcomes for the mothers; and through the outcomes for some mothers who really struggle with having to give up breastfeeding, and end up in the mental health system as a result.

All of us doing the same thing... getting a slice of all things, but really riding such a fine line, brought to such odds by a two - year election cycle on an endless media feedback loop, by a two - sided government that seems surprised our nation has ended up so.

Indeed, much of the UK government's time seems to have been taken up planning a referendum on an electoral system no one really wants.

Though modern conservatism sprung up in response to FDR's government interventionism, with plenty of Republicans in the 1930s labeling the New Deal socialist, it really got rolling in the anti-Communist hysteria of the 1940s and»50s, with Joe McCarthy and his ilk doing the dirty work and intellectuals like Bill Buckley and Irving Kristol providing the ideas.

«Are we really saying that in 2017 we have a party in government which doesn't want to have some metric way of reducing the number of kids who grow up in poverty?»

What they haven't done was to follow up with the more important questions in my view — which was to ask what data people really did need to understand the outcomes that government are creating.

«When there are really important matters before the House... they're unable to do so because of some ridiculous programme motion...» Lots of laughter from the government benches, until Khan shuts them up by saying he was quoting David Heath.

Secondly if we are processing this data in these algorithms and models, how do we open those up to scrutiny to ensure that people really do understand what government is saying.

Just as crucially as opening up a debate on the role of the private sector in education, the government must do a better job at getting a clear message across to the people who really matter.

Many Leave voters believe that her heart is not really in it --» [The Government] are trying to find a way not to leave» — while Remainers think that May and her Cabinet are «the blind leading the blind» and simply aren't up to the job.

All weighed together, there is a heavy burden of delivery deficit hanging around the neck of this government that it would be strange really should no one rise up to hit the polity even if that would cause some heat.

The tone was set by speakers such as Sue Cohen of the Single Parent Action Network who condemned the government for «riding on a climate of bigotry towards lone parents created by the last Tory government», and Marion Davis of One Plus, the major one parent organisation in Scotland, who pointed out that «the present government is looking towards the US» and asked «Do we really want to live in a society where lone mothers have to queue up at soup kitchens as they do in the US?»

A one - hour ethics course, is that going to really clean up ethics in government?

I wanted to focus my comments less on the process — it does not really need to be said any longer that the process of arriving at this treaty has been deeply dishonest and full of subterfuge, practised both by those proposing the new treaty and by the Government here in the lead - up to signing it — and principally on the contents.

«The state government — and I give the governor credit — has really been working to fill in gaps and trying to come up with new ways of using existing programs to help businesses reinvest, to help farms regain their footing, to look at how we address issues of homeowners and the challenges they face with their situations,» he said.

The two young men had listened to Mario's speech as it began to come together, «and when you work in government... you go through such highs and lows together that you really bond or you wind up very distant from the other person, because you really get to see a person's character,» Andrew Cuomo said.

I will tell you, I really do hope that there is a trial in this case so all New Yorkers can see, in gory detail, what their state government has been up to.»

If you really want to reduce the cost of government in Erie County you must include the taxing entities, school and special districts, that make up more than 60 % of all taxes levied in our county.

Then you deliberately appoint incompetents and crooks to high level jobs and hope that they really screw up government.

«I really do hope that there is a trial in this case, so that all New Yorkers can see, in gory detail, what their state government has been up to,» Bharara said in September 2016, when he unveiled the charges.

Asked about the Lib Dems he said, «The problem they have is very simple - they fought the 2010 election on a platform significantly to the left of Labour and then ended up in a Conservative Government with a platform significantly to the right of Labour... there's not really a cure for that.»

I do not think the government are really up to date with how dangerous the housing situation is becoming, and housing finance,» he said.

«Again, I really don't know from what angle the government is looking at when it says the economy is picking up, but from what we are seeing, I will say we still have a rough road to go.»

He argues: «The truth was, however fed up people were with the Tories, they were not going to switch to Labour in sufficient numbers unless they were absolutely sure of what we were going to do in government... We had to demonstrate that we really could manage people's money and steer an economic course that would deliver sustainable economic growth and jobs.»

He felt that this man was violating the ethics of his profession and so, he wrote a letter that eventually made its way to the foreign press and, you know, almost overnight, you know, really within a matter of weeks, the government backed down and ended the cover - up, fired the minister of health, fired the mayor of Beijing and it was really to me an inspiring example of how one person, you know, who had something to believe in can really change the course of events and the course of history really.

We worked with the Cambodian government to provide the technical background to allow them to set up the Seima Protection Forest which is in eastern Cambodia — really wonderful area for wildlife about the size of Yosemite — and set up strictly for the protection of carbon, when it was being deforested by people in search of economic well being.

But in the meanwhile, Canada's up - and - coming science and engineering researchers wait anxiously to see if the government is prepared to put its money where its mouth is, or if all of those hours spent laboring over equipment grants were really a waste of time.

«As governments prepare to set the rules and the first companies gear up to mine, now is the time to ask whether we just have to accept seabed mining, or should instead decide that the potential damage is just so great that we really need to find less destructive alternatives.»

But has the government really faced up to the fact that it will soon be dispersing critical expertise on the decontamination of soil built up over many years at the Department of Trade and Industry's Warren Spring laboratory?

But what we're really seeing, which we have not seen in fifty years, is the peeling away of the role of government — the move away from protecting the disenfranchised, the move away from speaking to those who don't have a voice, [and] the move away from lifting up people who have been pushed

So of course it's a joke that poor Susan Murphy (the voice of Reese Witherspoon: Four Christmases, Rendition) ends up in a government facility so secret that «it's a crime even to say its name» when she gets zapped by a radioactive meteorite on her wedding day and is mutated into... well, not Bridezilla, because Susan is a really nice, really sweet girl, one who's a bit too accommodating, actually, to her fiancé, TV weatherman Derek (the voice of Paul Rudd: I Love You, Man, Role Models).

We have five states that signed up to the National Education Reform agreement and just after the previous federal election the Abbot Government made a deal with the other states which really was a deal that meant that those states did not have the same level of accountability and transparency around the funding.

I do agree with this comment but the problem is that this government does not and will not listen to teachers nor parents.There have been many contentious issues over the past ten years and the government just ploughs on regardless.There needs to be a massive demonstration by society in order to protect the interests of students first.Politicians are notorious for telling us what we need and what is good for us and they have no clue what goes on in schools.I do not see a solution to this but the teacher unions must be much more vocal and really speak up for the teachers and parents in this country.

It's really a matter for the government to chase them up,» he said, though he admitted he was not surprised.

Together they decide to tell the truth about what really happened, exposing a shocking cover - up that has the potential to topple governments.

What is the dangerous secret that the terrorists carry, and why must their existence be denied and covered up at all costs to protect the future of mankind?And when you discover that the story is based upon a real research project that the United States government conducted, you will want to learn more, and may even ask «could this really happen?»