Sentences with phrase «really valued those things»

Not because I really valued those things but because I knew people would think I was a superior mom if I did them.

She taught me to really value things and she can make a H&M shirt looks like a billion dollar look.

Not exact matches

People are not being loaned more than the value of a house and that's the thing that really made things drop in the States.

This means looking for as many ways as possible to make the process and administration side of things really smooth and then find as many ways as possible to add value to the customer to make them feel incredibly appreciated in every way.

Life is a lot more fun if you spend it working hard at things you really enjoy and value.

But do one thing that everyone forgets to do, because it's really convenient for them to forget to do this: You have to price in an operating system — we don't get free OS's — and you have to value in a warranty — whatever you value it to be.

«But one thing I've really valued from Northwood is annually put - ting my personal budget in the context of the whole estate, the whole package.»

The only thing that really matters is learning how to create and offer value.

«One of the things we all have to remember is the value of a token over the long term is really going to be driven by its utility,» Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said on CNBC's «Squawk Alley.»

«One of the things that is really important is having clarity around the purpose or values of your brand,» says Ersher, who founded the soup - centric chain after identifying a lack of high - quality soup on the market.

Once I started to really put value in my minutes, things changed.

«Those are things Canadians seem to really value in companies,» he says, noting that consumers may be placing a premium on these two factors since the financial crash of 2008.

I don't really care if a company decides to issue a dividend or not; presumably, if they don't issue a dividend, then they're doing other things to increase the value of the company, which will be reflected in the stock price of the company.

«The most important thing is to really know who your customers are, what they value, what matters to them, and what they're looking for in the future,» says David Iudica, Director of Strategic Insights and Research at Yahoo.

Plus you really have to let the things sit around for a while to justify the appreciation in value.

It's about time someone wrote a book about the way things REALLY work at the values, ethics, and service levels in the marketplace.

And I reckon, it's sort of interesting for me for private equity in terms of all we've seen, and what we have seen, where we have seen some misconduct and things like that,»cause I always think like, to my simple mind, that the people in private equity, they're the greatest, they're actually adding value to their clients, they're getting paid really really well, you know, if I was in that position, the one thing I would think to myself as I skipped to work was like just «Let's not mess it up.

«His actions and his government's actions may well have some westerners wondering if this country really values western Canada, the resources we have, and the things we do to contribute to the national economy,» Wall said in a statement.

«The really open published APIs forces us to add value, if we don't do a good job adding value that's on our shoulders and our base is free to use other things, build other things, and we've just found the more open we are the more successful we have been commercially.»

There really is no single way to determine what a business is worth but there are several things you can analyze and review to measure performance, profitability, and a good value for the enterprise.

Unless the company really needs all of the money to execute on the value increasing milestones, this is also generally a bad thing for the company's culture and DNA.

It allows you to do the things that really matter to you such as going to your kids» little league games, school plays, reading, having coffee with friends, vacations with your spouse, or whatever else it is that you value highly.

It is one thing to believe homosexual relationships are sinful (I'm sure though that it is really more the sexual component that has people uncomfortable) and another thing to try and project that value on another.

Well, he could have made happiness really easy to attain - and if he's God, he's all powerful so he could have changed the principles of «value» to doing make things that are easy just as worthy.

So we really value our tradition, and we are not trying to be all things to all people.

Much of the value of this dialogue for process philosophers lies in following along precisely the sorts of things that Hausman and I said, for these are the sorts of things nearly all process philosophers say about Bergson, even those such as Hausman and I, who are very sympathetic to Bergson and try to study him closely (although admittedly, Hausman is really more a Peircean and I am more a Whiteheadian, and Gunter is really Bergson's true apologist).

Now the statement may be true or not, but the emotions that came up as I named different things made me aware of what I really held value to.

«what is valued is one thing, embedded in the attitudes, speech and behavior of that organization is what is really valued.

However, there is no proof for any god, so those people who really value logic don't believe in things with zero proof.

Its teachings are very, very simple: There really are free and natural markets where the optimum value of things is assigned to them; everyone must compete with everyone; the worthy will prosper and the unworthy fail; those who succeed while others fail will be made deeply and justly happy by this experience, having had no other object in life; each of us is poorer for every cent that is used toward the wealth of all of us; governments are instituted among people chiefly to interfere with the working out of these splendid principles.

He tosses in the athiest thing because the christian conservatives believe there is some war going on for American values, as if anyone who isn't christian isn't really American.

It's not really that the food or service is Christian; the family just tries to run it according to their values, so they close on Sunday, try to hire smiling employees (a.k.a. «Christian» employees, as if only Christians are happy), choose to donate things to Christian organizations, etc..

This segment would argue that the basic thing is really «the value question.»

For Ahaz the really decisive thing is what is of value to maintain the independence of the people of Judah, to save it from destruction at the hands of the invaders from the north.

The only thing I really don't like about these weekends is the lack of access to descent food or any food with even a sliver of nutritional value.

That spirit of generosity and reaching out to a variety of stakeholders also was noted by Sanjay Ghoshal, senior director and global head, Packaging, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.: ``... the one thing that really has struck me is the effort to create value across the supply chain instead of staying with either the brand owner or the consumer or the distributor.»

Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.

We can debate on how great the history is, compare ourselves to Chelsea, talk about how healthy our balance sheet his, how great the fans are (under valued by the club), how Tottenham are «scums», etc etc... All those things do not really matter... Usually it will be to make ourselves feel better and mask the clear lake of options and solutions in our own club.

What frustrates me about giroud is his apparent lethargy and moody shrugs of the shoulders when things don't go well but this is a more an emotive point and doesn't really effect his market value.

He does nt really excel at any one thing talent wise so what exactly is his value?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

One of the things that you really begin to understand when you travel around the world is not just the breadth of the club and the scale of the club around the world, but the degree of personal connection that people have with the club and with the values.

I know if we thinking plan trip really like to make trip in our budget... and value for money... this blog post suggest us that important thing.

«The things that go into making a great coach area: 1st: being a really compassionate caring person that has a real interest in people growing... the art of coaching begins with [a real] understanding [of] the value of the person in front of you... that high regard that a person has for another is at the center of GREAT coaching... That space between... the outcome and what [we say] to them... defines young minds, how they think about themselves taking the credibility from an adult voice.

I love your phrase «inherent merit» re unmedicated labour — it is a really pervasive thing here — at least it is in my head - this site has made me question that value, and question why it is.

The planet is not a giant trash can, and we feel like the least we can do is think about the things we're responsible for leaving behind, and make sure they're really needed, valued and used to the fullest.

If this is your first baby and you're not sure what to buy, ask friends whose values are similar to your own about the things they really needed for their new little one.

By choosing to compliment your child for things that are specific and unique to them, you will let your child know that you really see them and value them for who they are.

My writing has really improved, I'm putting more thought into things, and more value on what I do.

Your three year old has to be will do a less desirable thing (take the time out of what he is doing to go potty) to access more desirable things (some thing he really values).