Sentences with phrase «really was the party to»

«It really was the party to end all parties,» Haynes said of the Velvet Goldmine festival soiree, which was so fittingly lavish for the film that it is forever catalogued «in Cannes lore» by those who attended.

Not exact matches

«There is no doubt that with help from Hammer this is going to be a really hot party,» Aronson said.

«That great mass in the middle of the country really ought to be most responsive to the message of the Democratic Party,» he said.

«I think what we need to do is really to start negotiations and to see how we do this withdrawal; if a transition is needed, making a transition that is not causing economic damage (for either side),» Verhofstadt said, adding that it was only then that both parties should consider their future relationship.

«If you're relying on a third party to look for fraud, then chances are really good that, eventually, there's going to be something you're not going to catch.»

The best way I can describe the people we want is like this: There are some people who throw great dinner parties because they really want to take care of their guests, and there are other people who are lousy at it because everything is a chore, everything is a problem.

The idea is to try and find what the other party really wants out of the deal while also identifying what you might not care as much about yourself, which are great places for compromise.

British opposition politicians said Trump was not welcome in the U.K. Former opposition Labour party leader leader Ed Miliband tweeted to Trump that the reason he cancelled was really «because nobody wanted you to come.

«Submitting to third - party certification and the transparency that comes with it is really putting yourself out there.

I think the really interesting thing that could happen leading up to the presidential election is that there will be rumblings of third parties.

But with holiday parties bringing everyone in the company together for a once - a-year event, Fischer says «talking to people you always talk to is a really missed opportunity.»

A growing number of current cars are already coming equipped with LTE connections, but does Google really want to entrust such an important function of its autonomous vehicles to third - party wireless carriers?

«There is no doubt these are real costs — often more substantial than the expense ratios that are more easy to discover — but fund companies certainly don't make it easy to discover, and one really has to subscribe to third party research to find these costs.»

Breaking open your business and thinking about each different component of value and whether it can be interfaced with and offered to other parties is a really interesting model for agility moving forward.

But opting out of superficial chat isn't really an option if you're ever planning on going to a conference, or a cocktail party, or really any place where there are other human beings you don't know that well.

Making these plans, big or small, can be really fun and also shows that both parties are making efforts to keep things moving forward and maintain one another as a priority.

He seeks to really understand the party he's sitting with and dedicate himself completely to that understanding in the moment.

But it is not «symbiotic,» because it can be ended at any time without really threatening either party's solvency and survival» could you please explain why you don't think that if, say, the US and China had to sever their economic ties (Walmart & Co.) that would not severely hurt both economies?

As far as the Tea Party excuse, are you really going to let CNBC personality Rick Santelli dictate policy here?

Broker - dealers that have «proprietary products, affiliated mutual funds and insurance products,» Reish says, «almost have to go under the best interest contract exemption because they can't really do level fee;... the fees have to be level, not only for the individual advisor but for the BD and all related parties — including the insurance company and mutual fund manager.»

Group chats, for the uninitiated, can include up to 250 users — this is really useful for those who are, say, planning a surprise birthday party, or a big vacation.

MH: Because they need altogether about $ 5 trillion to create... If they're going to create 500 billionaires to run the country for the next century and to create really a new feudal class they need $ 5 trillion and they don't want the people to know what's occurring because if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alternative.

If the countries are now haggling about details involving third parties, Dawson says that's encouraging: «If that's really what they're down to, that looks like a very negotiable piece of business.

I mean, at the end of the day, we are really just talking about a shared record system, but it solves a real problem especially within financial services where you have multiple parties trying to track the same transaction.

In this week's episode, we ask former PC President, Katherine O'Neill, about what really happened inside the PC party after it was nearly wiped off Alberta's political map in 2015, and why she decided to step down from the party executive, just three weeks after the election of party leader Jason Kenney.

«Group decisions - My perhaps jaundiced view is that it is close to impossible for outstanding investment management to come from a group of any size with all parties really participating in decisions» Warren Buffett 1965

Corecco added that in today's globalized, multicultural, and secularized world, where the faith is something that can not simply be taken for granted, it becomes necessary to require a more explicit faith of the contracting parties, if we really want to save Christian marriage.

We still need another candidate, and I don't mean Gingrich or Santorum — neither of whom are really Tea - Party kind of guys (to begin a long list of problems).

If he was in some way really an embarrassment to that high party or had some dirt and wasn't considered stable with such info, one might see that the threatening letters could have been sent to the police by someone other than Doug.

«There's really no daylight between those the two groups,» says Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion group the Susan B. Anthony List, referring to Tea Party and religious conservatives.

I don't really trust anyone from the Republican party who is overly religious to keep their religious views out of their political decision making process.

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.

But humility, mercy, poking at the question of whether a blog forum can really serve as a place for such intimate pain and extraordinary accusations of abuse... especially when, again, parties are apparently asking for direct, private conversation... just doesn't seem all that outrageous to offer as thoughts to the conversation.

When candidates for high office are faking it in order to persuade a party's base that, appearances and past record to the contrary notwithstanding, they really, really are «with the program,» they step into dangerous territory.

The truth is, you can't really belong to either party.

Even if all parties were to agree that American republicanism is not classically liberal, or that classical liberalism really is ontologically indifferent, or that the laws of nature and of nature's God are the foundation of constitutional order and that these are the same thing as natural law — even if, in other words, all parties were to agree to some version of a pristine American founding harmonious in principle with the truth of God and the human being — returning to the first principles of the eighteenth century isn't much more realistic than a return to the first principles of the thirteenth.

You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your vote matters is by voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?

(BTW: I have to say, that your image of Jesus «partyin» with sinners (or anyone else) is really stretching things more than a little beyond the texts as we are told only of one «party» He attended during His incarnation — the marriage in Cana — and His words to His mom before turning the water into ripple give the impression that His attitude was far from that of someone wanting to hoist a few and sing off - key Foghat songs until the sun came up) 10.

These are real questions, and when she utters the postmodern cliché, «Conflict is only generated by the familiar commitment to One; Creativity is generated by the Many,» I suspect that she doesn't really believe it: her own work tells her that univocal obsessives are much more likely to be creative than cocktail party flibbertigibbets who constantly espouse multiple positions.

It's pretty obvious that men sold and keep on selling religion to other weak - minded fools to «try to make them feel better» (but really, it's always been about making a buck; they are sneaky this way, just like the current Republican party).

This is unfortunate, because it means that it is bad for someone to really have their say and vote for a third party that is closer to what they believe, and because it entrenches the established parties, whom I would argue are both in desperate need of major evolution.

When a woman tries to call her family to meals and they are so bent on their own pursuits that they do not come, or tries to correct a child who pays no attention, or talks into the telephone to discover suddenly that she has been cut off or that the other party has hung up the receiver, she is not really speaking to anyone.

Really incredible take on the STORY Jesus tells in Luke 19 about a king rejected by his servants — interesting because Sam applies it to unbelievers when it was meant to be applied to the religious crowd who were rejecting Jesus — not the pagans like Zacheus's crowd that Jesus had just had a party with.

The only party in this who has a high moral ground to stand on are the team and their non-Jewish coach, who knew what is really important in living a moral life.

The TEA party is really Libertarians in disguise and they're trying to hijack the Grand Old Pparty is really Libertarians in disguise and they're trying to hijack the Grand Old PartyParty.

Bondservant, If you really think that the republican party is serious about reversing Roe v Wade, then I have a bridge to sell you.

perhaps not surprisingly, i don't really trust most polliticians — of any party, for the very reasons we're discussing... i think most have had to «do what they've had to do» to get to where they are... perhaps this is why jesus had little to say or do with politics?

Greg, to your response, Franklin Graham is not really speaking the truth but he is displaying political favoritism and his comments make him no different than those Tea party loonies who refused to accept the facts that Obama's citizenship is legitimate.

At one point, David Blaine (who, evidently gets invited to some really cool parties, because, honestly, who wouldn't want to hang out with David Blaine) was with a group of people that included Dave Chappelle, Steph Curry, Drake and Jimmy Butler.

People follow religion passively ignorant of its true history and nature, they follow political parties blindly unaware of who is really paying them off, and they will just be led to the slaughter giving away their hard - earned money due to fear for their soul and fear for their own self - interests... We all suffer, as they reap what they sow... Sophian