While spending per litigated case went up, so did the average stakes per litigated case — the average stakes were higher under loser pays because
the really weak cases had already been weeded out.
Not exact matches
The conventional economic
case for increasing short - term interest rates was
really quite
weak.
If that
really is the
case and I
really doubt it, that means the players are mentally
weak, but no, you will be told they are mentally strong by Wenger.
For example, if I'm looking at someone from the back and they're running and I'm seeing that the hip is excessively tilting from side to side meaning at mid-stance your hip just kinda collapses and drops toward one side when you're running and that's accompanied by something like a heel whip, that's a pretty good sign that it's an external rotator or that it's an abductor weakness issue vs. it being genetic because it actually shows that you have
weak hips whereas if I see that foot kinda rotating out a little bit but the hips are staying relatively level while you're running, then usually it's just the
case where you have that genetic kinda femoral anteversion and it's not
really an issue.
But the more this degree attainment is divorced from knowledge attainment (and test scores), the
weaker this effect might become over time (unless employers
really just care about conscientiousness, which may very well be the
case).
Regardless of the merits of this particular
case, if this is
really the best example of Amazon supposedly not looking out for their customers seems pretty
weak to me
Just a urinary tract infection will not make him «very
weak» and not eat unless the infection has spread up to his kidneys and into his entire body - he will need
really strong antibiotics if that is the
case.
Now in this
case the hardware IS
weak but we're not supposed to
really know that.
If that is
really the
case then our knowledge must be
really weak.