Sentences with phrase «really wrong answer»

This is a completely subjective question, and there's really no wrong answer.

Surrey: There's really no wrong answer here, but Okoye, head of the Dora Milaje, was an absolute badass with a heart of gold.

There's really no wrong answer here, but if you want my advice... here it is: Go with something that makes your heart beat fast.

Whether it's walking along the beach listening to the waves crash, sitting on a patio watching the sunset, or curled up in bed with a good book there's really no wrong answer.

Not exact matches

«I pray every day that God will put all the right things, all the right people and the right projects in my life and to take all the wrong things and the wrong people out, and I really pray and believe that he does so I have to swallow my pride and take those things as answers,» she added.

«Instead of spending months or even years on a hunch that may turn out to be wrong, you're able to answer your questions really quickly — to stop debating in the abstract, and start making progress.»

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

The tone of your post sounds like you really don't want the answers, but here you go: You're wrong on all counts.

The question,» is it wrong for wrong for Christians to call God «Allah» cna be answered by recognizing who «Allah» really is.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Is there anything wrong with that — short answer, no, If the ending is good then should I really worry about the journey?

No.the solution is not to get some1 to rotate with Giroud, the answer is to get some1 better than Giroud, period.It worries me that Giroud really thinks that Henry is wrong, this shows how much Wenger an the people at Arsenal are caught up in their own bubble unable to see an overview from outside.We've been saying that Girouds not good enough since he came 3 years ago, an im afraid nothing has changed, he still not world class, i can't think of a top team in Europe he would get into.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's almost impossible to break down where it all went wrong, but the simplest answer is that it never really went wrong — it went stale.

There are not really «right» or «wrong» answers to these questions, but here are some quick tips to help you navigate the tricky parenting area of feeding your kids sweets and treats:

Don't get me wrong, the answer is still useful, but basically you don't know why, maybe nobody really knows why.

You really came to the wrong blog to fat shame someone, and your comment is rude, but I'll answer your question.

There's studies to support both methods of taking creatine and there's not really a right or wrong answer.

However, there really isn't a wrong answer.

HI Jackie, I actually don't really do much with stained furniture only painted so I wouldn't be the best one to answer that, and I would hate to tell you the wrong thing.

You could ask ten people their favorite beach on Nantucket and get ten different answers, which I take as a good sign that you really can't go wrong!

But there really are no right or wrong answers.

There really isn't a «wrong answer here.

There really are no right or wrong answers for the discussion prompts.

For me, it's usually about the third time I think «I really need to drop some information here because they're so going down the wrong path,» that they arrive at the answer I was going to give them all on their own.

I would try to get in the habit of pausing it and then going to the whiteboard and looking at the ones she got wrong, and so I think the apps that provided the right answer right after or quickly — you could go back and look at the right answer, review it without the time pressure — really helped my student.

But effective teachers also help students see that «wrong» answers are really just clues to solving a puzzle.

«The first time you see an answer sheet where, on a test with 40 questions, there was an average of 18 answers changed from wrong to right in a single classroom, it's not really a «eureka» moment,» he says.

No, really — there's no wrong answer.

Indeed, there's no right or wrong answer here, and it's really a matter of preference.

This question is really a business decision, and there's not a wrong answer, depending on your goals.

The format of the site works really well for objective questions with distinct answers that can be right or wrong.

There really is no right or wrong answer, Cathy, to whether you rent or buy.

So there is no right or wrong answer really, it just depends on what your current fund offers.

Doug Hoyes: So, there's no right or wrong answer; you've got to really evaluate your own situation.

If you're really feeling nervous & can't shake it, focus on averaging into event - driven situations instead, «cos you're probably wrong & cash still ain't the answer.

Do you really want me to offer what I think is wrong with these answers?

The thing with subjects like this is that they're very, very subjective and there really isn't a right or wrong answer....

There are no right or wrong answers since the story moves along just fine no matter what you say — you're allowed to use random symbols and the English alphabet, proving that the game doesn't really care as long as you keep on with the main quest.

We feel like there's not really a right or wrong answer there, there's no such thing as you absolutely shouldn't do X, Y, or Z, we try to give you a tremendous amount of freedom as to how you and your team decides which heroes to play.»

There really is not right or wrong answer to the question, either.

While there really isn't a wrong answer, it does allow for some interesting and humorous dialogue.

«With contemporary art,» he observes, «it's very difficult to know what will stand the test of time; there are really no right or wrong answers.

My recent writings on GM food crops, including in The Land newspaper last Thursday, have resulted in some emails suggesting that I am wrong and that organics, rather than GM, really are the answer.

But, even though your question was non-specific, I will give the specific answer to the question I think you really meant to ask (and please correct me if I'm wrong).

For the latter we don't really know whether the method of little power gives the right or the wrong answer.

But it is late and I am tired, so if I am wrong and it is only that the text and the graphics seem to indicate they give the same answer but they really don't for some mysterious reason, so be it.

I once argued with a fried regarding some of the accepted orthodoxy regarding climate change alarm and at the time I really didn't have a good answer for «how is it that all these scientists and politicians got it so wrong if you're right?»

We might not really have the definitive answer on whether that is true for 20 years, but I would like nothing better than to be proven wrong about the linkage I'm making today.

Keep in mind that there are really no right or wrong answers to which type is best for you and your family.