Sentences with phrase «rear male nudity»

This romance with a sci - fi twist contains many views of rear male nudity (in a non-sexual context) and one scene of rear female nudity.

Later, some skinny - dipping males provide a view of rear male nudity for two women hiding in the trees and another scene implies an unmarried couple is sleeping together.

The tripped out boys toss furniture out the hotel window and wander around the room naked (rear male nudity is seen).

Once «high,» they toss furniture out of the hotel window and one wanders around naked (rear male nudity is seen).

Not exact matches

Rear buttock nudity of children and adult males is seen in non-sexual contexts.

Unfortunately, the writers chose to include dozens of uses of the F - word (and other foul language), lots of male nudity (the locker room variety, photographed from the rear), and a particularly disgusting sex scene.

«Grown Ups,» a Columbia Pictures release, is rated PG - 13 for crude material including suggestive references, language and some male rear nudity.

Sexual Content: C - Male rear nudity shown when characters skinny dip, male and female characters dress in scanty primitive clothing, woman presented to man as present, ape characters touch their mouths together in an affectionate kiss and hold hands on several occasions, man shown sleeping beside a woman (no sexual inference is made), man comments on a world with «lots of lovemaking but no love,» man is disrobed causing humiliation and male rear nudity is shown, talk of emasculating a Male rear nudity shown when characters skinny dip, male and female characters dress in scanty primitive clothing, woman presented to man as present, ape characters touch their mouths together in an affectionate kiss and hold hands on several occasions, man shown sleeping beside a woman (no sexual inference is made), man comments on a world with «lots of lovemaking but no love,» man is disrobed causing humiliation and male rear nudity is shown, talk of emasculating a male and female characters dress in scanty primitive clothing, woman presented to man as present, ape characters touch their mouths together in an affectionate kiss and hold hands on several occasions, man shown sleeping beside a woman (no sexual inference is made), man comments on a world with «lots of lovemaking but no love,» man is disrobed causing humiliation and male rear nudity is shown, talk of emasculating a male rear nudity is shown, talk of emasculating a man.

MPAA Rating: (for crude material including suggestive references, language and some male rear nudity)

It's not a very logical turn of events, but the glimpses of male rear nudity and exaggerated belly flop sounds present one of the film's biggest set pieces.

So are the infrequent inclusions of strong profanities, rear male and female nudity, and a joke about a milkman that includes a crude sexual reference.

Eat Pray Love is rated PG - 13 by the MPAA for brief strong language, some sexual references and male rear nudity.

To a degree, this content is warranted so that we can understand the complexities of his character, but the unnecessary rear male and female nudity adds to the reasons this movie is in the R - camp.

The film includes a young prostitute, a lesbian wedding, a drugged - out hick party, and what the MPAA would have labeled «male rear nudity» had this been rated PG - 13 instead of R. It's all in good fun, though, and mostly good taste, granting you enjoyment similar to Mike Judge's Office Space.

Grade: C (Rated PG - 13 on appeal for brief strong language, some sexual references, and male rear nudity.)

Poor (0 stars) Rated PG - 13 for profanity, male rear nudity, crude humor and suggestive material.

Well, Lenny's wife Roxanne (Salma Hayek), who even Lenny admits in the movie's single and genuinely clever joke is too beautiful for him, is over-emotional (the movie's opinion of her) because she wants to have another kid, so it does aim one sexist stereotype at one of its few major female characters (Speaking of sexism, can we talk about the MPAA ratings board's glaring double standard in pointing out that a movie's nudity is of the «male rear» variety, directly implying that there's something different — worse, more offensive — about the same of the female kind?).

Parents should be aware that violent depictions are more frequent and intense than in its predecessor, although this edition is softer with its criticisms of religion and animal abuse, and contains only female cleavage instead of male rear nudity.