Sentences with phrase «rear overhang»

but maintained the same overall length, with a shortened rear overhang.

It is nearly identical to the EL but it features a shorter rear overhang, a shorter wheelbase and less cargo capacity.

In contrast to Sport quattro, the Audi designers also shortened the rear overhang by a total of 200 mm to maintain the harmony of the basic proportions.

Boot space is 37 litres more, despite the truncated rear overhang — 15 mm shorter.

To balance the overall design, the rear overhang is also slightly greater than on the regular IS models.

The XL - 7 is based on the Grand Vitara, although the wheelbase is stretched 12.6 inches and the rear overhang is lengthened 6.5 inches.

The Sportswagon's rear suspension has been subtly tuned to accommodate the longer rear overhang of the boot, and the potential for larger, heavier luggage loads than the five - door hatchback.

From the A-pillars rearward, the Coupe features unique exterior styling with a lower and more steeply raked roofline, nearly 1 inch lower than the Sedan, and more compact proportions, with the rear overhang and overall length shortened by 5.5 inches.

However, the rear overhang is extended by 115 mm (now 1,070 mm)-- making the new Sportswagon 95 mm longer (now 4,600 mm) than its predecessor to create significantly more cargo space.

The large 22 - inch wheels fill up the flared arches and the upswept rear overhang is complemented by the sloping roof and the raked D - pillar.

In addition, the iQ is equipped with a flat gas tank housed beneath the floor that reduces rear overhang.

Curiously the two body lengths sit on the same length wheelbase, so the long L2 model stands out with a longer rear overhang.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): 87/12.7 SAE Peak Horsepower: 180 @ 6,400 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 175 @ 3,900 rpm Transmission Type: 9 - speed automatic Model 948TE Ratios: First: 4.71:1; Second: 2.84:1; Third: 1.91:1; Fourth: 1.38:1; Fifth: 1.00:1; Sixth: 0.81:1; Seventh: 0.70:1; Eighth: 0.58:1; Ninth: 0.48:1; Reverse: 3.80:1 Transfer Case Type: N / A Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: 20:1 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: PTU Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: IRS Rear Diff: RDM Ratio: 2.54:1 Traction Aid: Brake - based electronic traction control (front and rear) Suspension Front: McPherson strut Rear: Chapman strut Steering Type: Electric power - assisted rack - and - pinion Lock - to - Lock: 2.75 Turning Circle (ft): 35.3 Wheels 17x6.5 aluminum Tires P215 / 65R17 Goodyear Wrangler SRA Brakes Front: Vented rotor with single - piston floating caliper Rear: Solid rotor with single - piston floating caliper 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 100 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph as tested (sec): 10.84 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 3,600 Advertised GVWR: 4,586 Trailer Tow Capacity: 2,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 21/29 As Tested: 20.57 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 101 Overall Length: 165 3/4 Overall Width: 80 1/4 Overall Height: 68 7/8 Front, Rear Track: 61, 60 1/2 Front, Rear Overhang: 20 1/8, 17 3/4 Min.

Its wheelbase (2942 mm) and rear overhang have both both reduced and several integrated stiffeners are included to supplement the frame for poised, flat and ultimately controllable cornering.

A 14 - degree increase in the rake of the rear screen and a muscular hip above the rear wheel arch combine to make the overall appearance more compact, despite a 20 mm increase in the rear overhang.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): Diesel / 26 SAE Peak Horsepower: 310 @ 3,200 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 555 @ 1,600 rpm Transmission Type: 6 - speed automatic Model: Aisin A466ND Ratios: First: 3.742:1; Second: 2.003:1; Third: 1.343:1; Fourth: 1.00:1; Fifth: 0.773:1; Sixth: 0.634:1; Reverse: 3.539:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed part time Model: Magna TX91A Low - Range Ratio: 2.717:1 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: AAM 235 mm (9 1/4) open Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: AAM 250 mm with GKN LDC3 - 2 manual locking differential (PRO-4X) Ratio: 3.916:1 Traction Aid: Vehicle Dynamic Control, Traction Control System, Hill Start Assist, Hill Descent Control (front and rear) Suspension Front: IFS double - wishbone; 36 mm stabilizer bar; Bilstein Monotube coilover shocks Rear: Solid axle with multileaf; 18 mm stabilizer bar Steering Type: Hydraulic - assist recirculating ball Lock - to - Lock: 3.75 Turning Circle (ft): 53.8 Wheels 18x7.5 aluminum alloy Tires 275 / 65R18 General Grabber APT Brakes Front: ABS; Electronic Brake - force Distribution; 14.17 - inch vented disc Rear: ABS; Electronic Brake - force Distribution; 14.37 - inch vented disc 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 109.5 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 11.77 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 7,240 Advertised GVWR: 8,990 Trailer Tow Capacity: 11,784 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate: N / A As Tested: 12.54 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 151 1/2 Overall Length: 245 1/2 Overall Width: 98 1/4 Overall Height: 78 Front, Rear Track: 69, 68 1/2 Front, Rear Overhang: 28, 32 1/4 Min.

The rear styling makeover begins at the touchdown point of the C - pillar, which is moved rearward to create an even more pronounced fastback appearance combined with a shorter rear overhang.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): Diesel or B20 / 21 SAE Peak Horsepower: 181 @ 3,400 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 369 @ 2,000 rpm Transmission Type: 6 - speed automatic Model: Hydra - Matic 6L50 Ratios: First: 4.06:1; Second: 2.37:1; Third: 1.55:1; Fourth: 1.16:1; Fifth:.85: 1; Sixth: 0.67:1; Reverse: 3.20:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed active on demand Model: Magna Low - Range Ratio: 2.72:1 Axles Front Type: IFS open diff with automatic disconnect Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: Automatic locking G - 80 Ratio: 3.42 Traction Aid: G - 80 automatic locking differential rear Suspension Front: Independent coilover shock; twin - tube shock absorber Rear: Solid axle multileaf springs; twin - tube shocks Steering Type: Electronic rack Lock - to - Lock: 3.25 Turning Circle (ft): 41.3 Wheels 17x8 aluminum Tires 255 / 65R17 Goodyear Duratrac Brakes Front: ABS; Duralife rotors; hill descent control Rear: ABS; Duralife rotors; hill descent control 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 107.3 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 12.35 Weight (lb) Curb Weight (As Tested): 4,920 Advertised GVWR: 6,200 Trailer Tow Capacity: 7,600 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 25/31 As Tested: 21.46 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 128 Overall Length: 212 Overall Width: 84 Overall Height: 70 1/2 Front, Rear Track: 62 1/4, 62 1/2 Front, Rear Overhang: 21 1/2, 31 1/4 Min.

Suspension Front: SLA with twin lower links with air springs / CVD with Passive ARB Rear: Integral link with air springs / CVD with Passive ARB Steering Type: Electric Power Assisted Steering rack - and - pinion Lock - to - Lock: 2.75 Turning Circle (ft): 41 Wheels 20 - inch aluminum alloy Tires 255 / 55R20 Goodyear Eagle F1 SUV 4x4 Brakes Front: Ventilated 13.78 - inch steel disc Rear: Ventilated 13.78 - inch steel disc 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 99.8 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 9.77 Weight (lb) Curb Weight as tested: 5,360 Advertised GVWR: 6,614 Trailer Tow Capacity: 7,716 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 22/29 As Tested: 23.94 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 114 1/2 Overall Length: 189 3/4 Overall Width: 88 Overall Height: 72 Front, Rear Track: 66 1/2, 66 Front, Rear Overhang: 17 3/4, 25 1/2 Min.

«You best appreciate the profile and proportions of E-PACE when viewed from a little distance; given the E-PACE's longer front overhang, we've balanced this with a shorter rear overhang to give the car a sense of movement, even when stationary, which is a Jaguar trademark.»

First off, the nose is clearly four to five inches longer while the rear overhang adds a few more inches to overall length.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): 91/25.4 SAE Peak Horsepower: 416 @ 5,250 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 450 @ 2,250 rpm Transmission Type: 7 - speed automatic transmission with steering wheel mounted shift paddles Model: 7G - Tronic Ratios: First: 4.38:1; Second: 2.86:1; Third: 1.92:1; Fourth: 1.37:1; Fifth: 1.00:1; Sixth: 0.82:1; Seventh: 0.73:1; Reverse 1: 3.42:1 Reverse 2:2.23:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed transfer case, fulltime with locking center differential Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: N / A Axles Front Type: Solid Front Diff: manual locking Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: Manual locking Ratio: 4.38 Traction Aid: locking differentials (front and rear) and 4 - Wheel Electronic Traction System (4ETS) Suspension Front: Rigid Axle with longitudinal and transverse links, coil springs, gas - pressurized shock absorbers, stabilizer bar Rear: Rigid Axle with longitudinal and transverse links, coil springs, gas - pressurized shock absorbers Steering Type: Hydraulic assist recirculating ball box Lock - to - Lock: 3.25 Turning Circle (ft): 44.6 Wheels 7.5 J x 19 aluminum alloy Tires P275 / 55R19 Pirelli Scorpion Zero Brakes Front: Internally vented rotor 12.4 - inch discs Rear: Internally vented 10.7 - inch discs 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 95 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 7.92 Weight (lb) Curb Weight (As Tested): 5,900 Advertised GVWR: 7,056 Trailer Tow Capacity: 7,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 13/14 As Tested: 12.24 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 112 Overall Length: 188 1/2 Overall Width: 81 1/2 Overall Height: 77 1/2 Front, Rear Track: 59 3/4, 59 3/8 Front, Rear Overhang: 17 1/4, 27 Min.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): Diesel / 24.5 SAE Peak Horsepower: 188 @ 3,800 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 325 @ 1,400 rpm Transmission Type: 5 - speed Automatic Model: NAG1 Ratios First: 3.595:1; Second: 2.186:1; Third: 1.405:1; Fourth: 1.00:1; Fifth: 0.83:1; Reverse: 3.167:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed with 65 % rear, 35 % front Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: 1.4 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: N / A Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: N / A Ratio 3.923:1 Traction Aid: Electronically controlled traction system (4ETS)(front and rear) Suspension Front: Transversally mounted monoleaf spring; reinforced shock absorbers; stabilizer bar Rear: longitudinally mounted leaf springs; reinforced shock absorbers Steering Type: Rack - and - pinion Lock - to - Lock: 3.375 Turning Circle (ft): 47.6 Wheels 6.5 Jx16 aluminum alloy Tires 265 / 75R16 BFGoodrich KO2 All Terrain Brakes Front: Disc Rear: Disc 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 134.7 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 14.43 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 6,040 Advertised GVWR: 8,550 Trailer Tow Capacity: 5,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 21/29 As Tested: 17.38 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 145 3/4 Overall Length: 239 Overall Width: 96 1/2 Overall Height: 100 1/4 Front, Rear Track: 67 7/8, 68 1/4 Front, Rear Overhang: 25, 38 Min.

When fully load, the rear overhang is 185 mm, enabling it to handle various road conditions.

It has got a significant amount of rear overhang to add to its profile.

The long rear overhang is set off by subtle spoilers on the roof and rear window line, while bridged LED tail lamps and huge tailpipe outlets round up the rear.

The rear body was extended to improve load space but at the expense of added rear overhang, which adversely impacted off - road ability.

Differentiating itself from the Civic Sedan, the new Civic Coupe features a lower and more radically sloping roofline, shorter rear overhang, and aggressive rear styling with distinctive full - width light bar and overall more compact and sporty styling.

Feb 22, 2016 — Differentiating itself from the Civic Sedan, the new Civic Coupe features a lower and more radically sloping roofline, shorter rear overhang, and aggressive rear styling with distinctive full - width light bar and overall more compact and sporty styling.

Back to the interior The Honda scores a clear victory in the boot thanks to its longer rear overhang.

While they share the same 104 - inch wheelbase, the coupe's longer rear overhang sees its length extend five inches over that of the hatchback.

Instead, the two glass panels almost meet up with the hatch having sides integrated into the rear overhang.

Classic sculpted coupe design cues such as curvaceous rear haunches, short front overhang, prominent front grille and longer rear overhang echo the look and feel of some of the great Bentleys of yesteryear.

Compared to the previous generation Ridgeline, the new Ridgeline has a 5 mm longer front overhang and a 10 mm shorter rear overhang.

The 124 is a total of 5 inches longer than its Japanese cousin; two of those inches manifest as a longer rear overhang and just a bit more trunk space.

The extremely short front overhang, the very long rear overhang and two long lines stretching along the side amplify the focus placed on driving dynamics.

The focal point of the design is it's stretched silhouette composed of a long hood contrasted by a short front overhang and a long rear overhang.

In the past we ran side windows on the C5 - R only at Le Mans, but to optimize the C6.R's aero balance with its shorter rear overhang, we now run side windows at every race.

It has a taut, muscular presence with standard 18 - inch wheels and tires that work together with large wheel arches, aggressively raked body sides, a steeply raked windscreen and a short rear overhang.

The roofline is an inch lower than the sedan and the rear overhang is 5.5 inches shorter.

The most noticeable difference is the longer rear overhang, which allows for a rear quarter window and a bigger trunk.

The Compass is 150 mm longer overall than the Renegade it shares a platform with, and the extra length has shared out between a longer wheelbase and extended rear overhang.

With its extended rear frame the R - Type chassis was well suited for this coachwork with its rather long rear overhang.

The rear overhang gives balanced proportions to this 2 door «convertible».

The principal difference is that the Outlander has a longer rear overhang, which means it has more load space than the ASX 4Work.

Moving to the sides, we find the front overhang was decreased by 0.8 inches, while the rear overhang was increased by 0.8 inches, essentially moving the body rearward on its wheelbase.

The rear overhang plays a key role in the harmonious proportions of the two - door car.

Both cars share an identical wheelbase, which explains why the larger rear overhang on the XLV makes it look a little awkward from some angles.

Although the two body styles share a nose, the Forte5 hatchback is the better - looking of the two with its short rear overhang and rear spoiler.

A lot of this can be attributed to the Sportwagon's extended rear overhang, something not considered kosher in any sort of SUV.