Sentences with phrase «reason against using»

The second big reason against using toothpaste topically is that most of toothpaste's many chemicals are not substances you want inside your body.

Question: Isn't another reason against the use of impact sensors that, if they don't trigger an alarm or alert, sideline personnel may be lulled into thinking that the athlete has not suffered a concussion, and thus can safely continue playing?

The article's entire second section is tagged on like a careless afterthought, as though Susan's argument doesn't completely demolish the reasoning against using a resume template in the first half of the article.

Not exact matches

Internally, the Company's management uses these measures to evaluate performance against historical results, to establish financial targets on a consolidated basis and for other reasons, which are discussed below.

Bt as a rule using a work computer for personal reasons or doing work on a personal computer (or tablet or smartphone) can significantly change the threat level that an employer has to protect itself against.

«Part of the reasons active measures have worked in the US election is because the commander - in - chief has used Russian active measures at times against his opponents,» Watts said, pointing to Manafort and Trump's citations of fake - news stories pushed out by Russian - linked entities last year.

The reason you find n ******* r or nigger non offensive is because it was never used as a slur against your ancestry to denigrate you as a person.

It is well - reasoned and provides excellent arguments to use against all the standard polemics of those who want to drive religion down your throat.

And unfortunately, those same people will use the things we were honest about as weapons against us, because they have to have a reason for leaving and it must be our fault.

«That this House expresses profound concern that, despite voting 279 in favour and none against the motion calling on the Government to refer genocidal atrocities of Daesh to the United Nations Security Council on 14 April 2016, still, no such referral has been made; recalls the words of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs in an article in the Telegraph on 27 March 2016, Daesh are engaged in what can only be called genocide of the poor Yazidis, though for some baffling reason the Foreign Office still hesitates to use the term genocide; and calls on the Government to ensure that the unanimous will of Parliament is implemented with urgency.»

Just out of curiosity, back when you were «one of the champions in the church proudly speaking out against the threat of the homosexual offenders» what were the reasons you used to argue for that position?

Maybe the reason lots of people aren't interested in «Bible studies» is because the Bible has been used as a weapon or club against them in the past.

For this reason, some Lutheran theologians prefer to speak of «orders of preservation,» taking into account what God is doing to sustain the world under the conditions of sin, even using means sin - laden themselves, such as war and capital punishment, to fight against still more serious attacks on the goodness of God's creation.

People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.»

Against this, however, there are the strong reasons noted earlier for accounting this saying as authentic, and the consideration that no similar use of Ex.

tf: Did you once consider that maybe the reason it appears we speak out more against your god than other gods is because it is your gods believers that seem to be at the center of so much in this world??? I don't see Pagan's standing on street corners or attempting to use their holy books to deny equal rights.

And he did say that the use of violence to impose religion is to act against reason, and to act against reason is to act against the nature of God, for God has revealed himself as logos — the word and the reason by which all came to be and in which all coheres.

A law against blasphemy is the absolute best indicator that you can not substantiate your beliefs with good reasoning and instead must rely on a cowardly and primitive use of force.

None of these arguements use reason, logic or make sense when placed against reality.

Logic, science, and reason, the thing they use to try to defend themselves, have turned against them.

As he put it, «The law gives to capital an immense advantage in permitting its consolidation in great centralized corporations; and neither law nor justice can forbid laborers to combine, in order to protect themselves against the encroachments of capital, so long as they abstain from, that use of violence and rely upon reason and moral influence.»

Against secularism, the same theologians point to the many ideological distortions of science and technology in which scientific reason is used to dominate and victimize the same groups of persons and nature.

When used against a child, it is abuse in the extreme since the child has no way to apply reason to certain situations.

Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»

«Dare to be adult and let go of the church's apron strings; trust your own reason and measure revelation against it; be prepared to use your own reason critically in any context, as Alistair Mason summarizes the Enlightenment's challenge to Christianity.10 In Kant's words, the Enlightenment was «the emergence of human beings from a tutelage to which they had voluntarily acceded.11

it seems that shame is something you try to use as a weapon against those who have different belief systems than you do, which is one reason why a lot of people have left organized religion.

The story of Sodom in Genesis 18 was about violence and domination, the same type of event that takes place in prisons and occupied countries, but it was NOT the reason for God's decision to destroy the city, and to use this story as a basis for prejudice against ho mose xuality in general is like comparing ra pe to marriage.

And for whatever reason we use that as a club against the other.

Contrary to the protests against Justice Scalia's speech, a responsible use of judicial reasoning, as well as intellectual objectivity, would seem to require such humility.»

«The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is because vampires are allergic to bullspit.»

There may be other reasons to warn against the use of a condom in such a case, or to advise total continence, but these will not be because of the Church's teaching on contraception but for pastoral or simply prudential reasons — the risk, for example, of the condom not working.»

On this basis, technological reason can argue against continuing the rapid growth of population, pollution, industrial production, and use of natural resources.

Alcohol is well known to be addictive and has caused untold destruction, yet taboos against its use arguably do more damage, with less resulting moderation, than do appeals to reason and an understanding of the risks.

The third act, which Witham unfortunately describes as the «revolt against reason,» is dominated by Karl Barth, who used his Gifford Lectures to exposit the Scots Confession and remind his audience that it is God who measures us.

Catholic citizens have every reason — including the truth of the matter — to argue that our Constitution is much more democratic that our Court now says it is, just as they have every reason to argue that our Framers never meant «liberty» to be used as a wrecking ball deployed against our indispensable relational «intermediary» institutions — beginning with the family and the church.

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.

I can understand the support for Wenger as most sheep people have become used to have him around that they cant bring them self to realisation that he must be gone for the sake of the future of the club, but for f sake what reason is there that fans young and old not being eable to unite against Stan this time?

Arsenal dose not like to spend crazy money and I don't think that is the reason why they haven't won the premier league, it is more because of Arsene Wenger's rigid style (until recently) that other teams are used to and can easily defend against.

The only reason the player wouldn't permit his name to be used is because Rush has forbidden any rap against the former regime.

The experiment to use Alexis Sanchez through the middle against Liverpool last weekend did not go well so it will surely be our flying England forward Theo Walcott leading the line and that could make sense for a number of reasons.

Wenger is main reason that Sanchez and Ozil came to arsenal... so no point using your bais against him as the reason!

Against Chelsea with most of their defenders out like 5, they almost won they game.Against City with most of their defenders out with injuries and with ten men they almost equalized.And Against Arsenal, they were playing with 2 wingers, two 19 year old at the defense.which gives them the perfect reason for being dominated and with the tactics their manager use they beat Arsenal.After that with Hull, they completely dominated the game and with Stock City.

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

But according to our other big German star, Shkodran Mustafi, there is no reason why we should be overawed at facing the Bundesliga giants — as we are used to playing against massive sides in the Premier League on a regular basis.

Their counter complaint against the Yankees alleges cheating for this same reason, since it proposes that their rival team used video footage to communicate signs to players as well.

It used to be the same whenever we played United, such mentality is the reason Southampton and Stoke haven't lost to us on their ground in over two years, it's the same mentality that allows teams to thrash us every season, 6 - 0 against Chelsea, 6 - 3 against City, 6 - 1 against Liverpool, this season Southampton 4 - 0, doesn't ring a bell??

It also came at a time, where it was clear, we yet again were not anywhere near challenging for the PL title, and the reasons for not challenging seemed to be exactly the same as in the years before; losing most games against the other top clubs, and generally using tactics, where many opponents relatively score easily, especially if they are a bit physical and determined.

I was a Wenger fan and used to feel sorry for him when he was forced to sell players to help pay for the Emirates Stadium but those days are past now and there should be no reason why we can not compete against the best teams on the planet with at least 6 or 7 world class players in the team every week.

Unless you use the political leanings of a geographic area as the reasoning behind your rooting interests, which is more than a little childish, there's almost no way to root against the Rangers.

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now