Sentences with phrase «reason analysis like»

I often tell clients it is «per se per se», because it is not subject to rule of reason analysis like in the US.

Not exact matches

The reasons the judge ruled in the courts favor were strikingly similar to the department's actions (or lack of actions like their inadequate and prejudiced impact analysis).

The analysis is painful to look at because along with the obvious misspellings I didn't even attempt to correct for whatever reason, the analysis doesn't do anything but spout off random stats I pulled from it financials and places like Morningstar.

The same word or term in two places calls for like analysis unless some sufficient reason can be found to suggest a material distinction.

In the final analysis, however, it is clearly the materialist evolutionism of a thinker like Richard Dawkins rather than the implicit theism operative in Dembski's or Behe's writings that guides Ruse's reasoning.

if i am correct @ SD... your analysis shows you see the forest for the trees, most comments just give their opinion like they are playing Championship manager - as JT said coquelin has helped slightly fix the problem of the overexposure of our defence to counter attacks and the full backs don't both bomb forward as much, the reason monreal starts ahead of Gibbs - walcott always looks lost and confused now when he makes appearances, and never wants to create or get too involved in build up play just wants to run into the middle and get on the end of balls.

The one reason why the likes of Mourinho thrive is because of our journalists whose philosophy is to thrive on controversy, negativity, shallowness, sensationalism and lack of analysis.

So in summary I would say, statements like «Starting the season with 6 defenders» is one that requires a huge amount of analysis and reasoning before one can see if it is a valid report of an error.

I'd really like if if those who believe in the life - and - death struggle would provide some analysis to back this interpretation that is a little more rigorous than «It stands to reason» or «It's what I said last month / week / yesterday».

Ultimately, the reason listicles like the GdS published, and subsequent analysis such as these exist, rests with Luciano Spalletti, Walter Sabatini and Gerson's father.

3) Motyl says that realists» analysis of Russia and Ukraine is wrong because Putin himself emphasizes «domestic» reasons for his actions, like the historical ties of Russia to Ukraine.

Analysis of reasons for voting Lib Dem shows it has always been something of a dustbin party, the «I don't like politics but I do like to vote» party.

On the surface, this endless analysis sounds like a failure of reasoning, but Damasio suspected that there was a deeper cause.

Each group of pupils are given these worksheets which list the scores, explains the task and also contain pictures that they might like to stick on a poster next to their statistical analysis and interpretive reasoning.

Always be skeptical of analyses that reason like this: A will lead to B, B will lead to C, C will lead to D, D will lead to E, E will lead to F, which is a (horrible disaster / incredible success).

The reason why analysis is done geometrically is because the distribution of stock returns is assumed to be lognormal (even though it's really more like logLaplace).

Always be skeptical of analyses that reason like this: A will lead to B, B will lead to C, C will lead to D, D will lead to E, E will...

An analysis of the data on these dogs later in life — that does not account for the reasons for neutering and the order of events — could very well make it look like the early neutered dogs were at higher risk of joint problems.

Both authors even admitted that their reconstructions aren't statistically valid (and that was kind of their point...) and McIntyre, at least, has stated that he regards many studies since then the same way he does the original 1998 paper because they basically use the same datasets and analysis (And I should add that he seems less opposed to the more recent studies, especially those that don't use data he finds suspicious...) They've stated their a priori reasons why they don't like the data they don't like.

Tom, it is potentially useful in formal reasoning like evidence theory (see the original source I linked to in the Doubt analysis).

At first blush that can seem like a lot of coverage, but after some additional analysis the reason for this recommendation becomes quite clear.

A recent post on the Clearmatics website, titled «No, Bitcoin is not the future of securities settlement,» provides a point - by - point analysis of the original Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto from the point of view of the financial establishment, and a clear outline of the reasons why banks and mainstream financial institutions won't touch permissionless blockchain networks like Bitcoin.

Discussion includes topics like reasons to invest in forestry and timber land, mill / timber analysis and management, soil impacting ma... [Watch now]